Aces
Well-Known Member
No they didn’t. He was a free agent that got a better contract than the Canucks could affordAnd the Canucks traded him away.
No they didn’t. He was a free agent that got a better contract than the Canucks could affordAnd the Canucks traded him away.
True, sutter is definitely making them focus on playing better defensively. But when your starter has 5 SO in 15 games, can’t help but build confidence for whole team.I believe the Calgary backup keeper has 2 shutouts so they are doing something right.
I’ll trade you a former Norris winner, 3 time cup champ, great leadership ability. Bonus..he lives in BC.I know everyone raves about Demko and how good he's been but the fact of the matter is that his save % is only .906 which ranks him less than 50th in the league. He isn't even close to Markstrom. Yes he makes some good saves but also lets in goals that he shouldn't. I also hear people talking about our star players and how this team is good on paper, I think our players just aren't very good. Guys like Boesser, Petterson, Horvat, Pearson, Myers and the new guys they signed this past summer are very over-rated as the proof is what you're seeing on the ice this year and last year. Could you imagine trying to Trade Petterson right now, what other team in their right mind would give us anyone worthwhile.
I give up, who is that?I’ll trade you a former Norris winner, 3 time cup champ, great leadership ability. Bonus..he lives in BC.
Duncan Keith. HaI give up, who is that?
I was just coming back with that name. We hate Duncan Keith lol.Duncan Keith. Ha
Yes, he’s not too popular here. LOL!I was just coming back with that name. We hate Duncan Keith lol.
When you’re supposedly best offensive players aren’t producing you are screwedAnd the wheels just fell off!! What the hell happened???-are they really all that bad??
Agree with the Juolevi pick for sure as Benning wanted a defenceman badly and missed on Fox, Bean, McAvoy. At the end of the day if had just kept Tanev, didn't trade for E-Larrson, didn't give away Schmidt for a song even though he wanted out the Canucks defence would be solid IMHO. Virtanen over Ehlers and Nylander (enigma) was I think a middling owners decision. Benning got fooled on Gubranson as he had an outstanding playoff with Florida. Doing well in Calgary though as Sutter has simplified his game. Yup all kinds of JB decisions have been questionable especially the albatross contracts as mentioned. He has had his time to right the ship and hasn't got it done. He's finished in my opinion but at the same time he at least tried to correct his blunders. Too late I am afraid.Canucks could use a gritty leader type of guy who can score, some one like say Matthew Tkachuk,, but Benning took Oli Juolevi instead. How's that working out for the Canucks? Benning should be fired for that one move alone , ignoring the all the other draft picks wasted (Virtanen) or traded away for nobodies, wasting millions on Beagle, Roussell,Errickson so they couldn't sign guys like Tanev or Taffoli. . Now the legacy we will get from Benning even after he is finally fired, is another monster albatross contract for Ekmann -Larrson the Canucks will have to carry for years. There are also guys Benning traded for nothing like Gustav Forsling who plays top 4 defence minutes for Florida, Jared McCann has become a pretty good center, (his 12 points in 16 games would put him 4th in Canucks scoring, 2nd in goals) but Benning traded him for the human pylon Eric Gubrandson.
Agree with the Juolevi pick for sure as Benning wanted a defenceman badly and missed on Fox, Bean, McAvoy. At the end of the day if had just kept Tanev, didn't trade for E-Larrson, didn't give away Schmidt for a song even though he wanted out the Canucks defence would be solid IMHO. Virtanen over Ehlers and Nylander (enigma) was I think a middling owners decision. Benning got fooled on Gubranson as he had an outstanding playoff with Florida. Doing well in Calgary though as Sutter has simplified his game. Yup all kinds of JB decisions have been questionable especially the albatross contracts as mentioned. He has had his time to right the ship and hasn't got it done. He's finished in my opinion but at the same time he at least tried to correct his blunders. Too late I am afraid.
Canucks first and foremost need a seasoned President of Operations to oversee this mess.
Thanks Bill 310 as this hilarious article pretty much nails 51 years of what we see today. Even with Bure,Linden and Mogilny in the line up the curse continued. I was there on opening night and seen it all and really we the fans deserve better. The Stanley Cup riot is the only real moment I was truly embarrassed to be a fan and what we see today tells me more than ever a total overall is in order with the right, quality highly respected leader. In the past only Quinn and Burke were the only 2 that brought respectability to the organization. Not sure if there is anyone available out there that fits the bill?The Georgia Strait had an "interesting" commentary on the Canucks this week
I found it hilarious , others may not
Note this article is profanity laced and may be deemed offensive by some.
Note to readers: Growing up back east and seeing years of the Stanley Cup Barbershop Maple Leaf Calendars, and then for the last 52 years hearing the premature annual celebration of Toronto's September This Is The Year We Win The Stanley Cup Victory Parade I realize the Canucks still have three years to go to beat the Leafs as losers. Let's rejoice in how close they are to taking that win. Small Victories, but then the Leafs likely have a commanding Four Season Lead in not winning the Cup.
As another season goes swiftly down the drain, the time has finally come to say "Fuck. Off. Vancouver Canucks"
Enough is enough for one of longest-suffering fan bases in the NHLtinyurl.com
LOL-Old jokes are Best!Myers drinking game? every time Myers turns the puck over take a shot. You’ll have alcohol poisoning end of the first period