Driving an EV pickup

Haven't posted monthly stats for a bit. Cooler weather and a good chunk of highway driving in October played their part in energy use.

The most recent trip was Nelson and back, earlier this week. Temps mostly 5-10 C.

Distance driven: 660 km
Energy used: 190 kWh
Economy: 28.8 kWh
Public charging: $24
Home charging: $7
Per km cost: $0.047
Km claim (@$0.62/km) $409

The hotel had level 2 chargers for guests, 63 kWh of free juice. These deals can't last forever, folks!
 

Attachments

Got my first look at the Silverado EV in the wild this past week. Sleek looking package, a little more visually distinct from its ICE teammates than Lightning is from regular F-150s. It caught my eye as I drove past, was still there 15 minutes later on the return trip so I stopped in for a look.

Like all current model half ton trucks, it's huge. Bed rails are at my shoulder level, like a one ton from a decade ago. The endless weapons race that all auto makers seem to engage in. But there's another reason, the battery in this thing is a monster: 244 kWh. That's more than double what my Lightning has. Claimed range is 700 km, slightly more than what my Silverado 5.3L crew was good for. Doubtful you'll achieve that number on the highway of course, higher speeds knock it down pretty quickly. But still, that is a huge step up on Lightning, even the ER battery (130 kWh/480 km).

There's a payback of course, there always is. That battery is heavy, really heavy. The truck weighs 8,600 lb, and that cuts into payload - only 635 kg/1400 lb including driver and passengers. (Lightning has 2250 lb). The extra weight costs on efficiency as well, city/highway combined EPA number of 33 kWh/100 km vs 28 for Lightning, ie, almost 20% worse.

I'm not a fan of the charge port location. When towing, you'll be hoping for pull through charging locations. Otherwise it's unhitch to charge. I guess one mark in its favour is that left rear position matches Tesla. Lightning is a slightly awkward fit at those because of the front left setup. You need to park in the next stall over from the correct one for the charge cable to reach.

Still, it's a lot of truck for the money. This one, the 4WT, starts at $87K, the smaller battery 3WT gives away 100 km of range but costs ten grand less.

20241031_131142.jpg20241031_131219.jpg20241031_131300.jpg20241031_131156.jpg
 
Last edited:
The Silverado looks like a unibody, but I read that its not...nor is it body on frame. I suppose the unibody look is somehow related to the way the chassis is built.
 
GM products hitting the market now are built on their Ultium platform, a from-the-ground-up true EV. Commonly referred to as a "skateboard platform", with the deck being a big flat slab of batteries. It took time to develop this, plus their battery supply lines, hence why the Silverado/Sierra trucks arrived more than 2 years later than the Lightning release. Ford is working on their own fully integrated EV platform, known as the T3 system, expected to be released in the 2027 model year. That's when we can expect to see a wider range of options like single cab, double cab, crew cab, longer box sizes, midsize truck, SUVs. Lightning was a quickie project, essentially an engine swap, intended mainly to demonstrate proof of concept, sort out engineering details and produce in service data from the real world.

These newer EV designs are developing into something that doesn't fall into either unibody or body on frame category. That big platform of battery modules is also a structural component, a relatively light aluminum case can deliver sufficient stiffness while weighing less than a classic ladder chassis.
 
I think the Avalanche / Unibody look was deliberate so it was different. Time will tell on how this design works out as a Truck
 
Was Avalanche actually a unibody though? It certainly had the midgate and the plastic styling elements where cab met box that could make it look like a uni. GM sold a lot of those in the early years then they petered out.
 
Was Avalanche actually a unibody though? It certainly had the midgate and the plastic styling elements where cab met box that could make it look like a uni. GM sold a lot of those in the early years then they petered out.
I think it was a combination also...frame was there but box integrated with cab.
 
According to our friend Google: "The Avalanche was a hybrid between the Chevrolet Suburban SUV and the Chevrolet Silverado pickup truck, sharing the chassis with the Suburban. Unlike a typical pickup truck where the bed is mounted separately from the cab on the frame, the bed of the Avalanche was integrated with the cab body."

Just saying...
 
Good deal, 10K below MSRP. The 24s have a heat pump too, more efficient in winter.
 
So the long awaited Tesla adapter arrived today. Ford opened for online orders back in February for this free adapter. I got an order # in the 7000s, but Ford served its US owners first. Makes sense, we all know how long it takes to get the French messaging translated, approved and printed.

Aftermarket adapters have been available for a while, but I didn't see the point in spending almost $300 for something I'll use maybe 3 or 4 times a year, and will have little to no resale value now that the free adapters are hitting the streets.

Anyhoo, I guess it's off to the local Supercharger soon to give it a test run.

20241127_163835.jpg
 
Nice, the supercharger infrastructure on the island is getting better. I saw two Cybertrucks rolling around Victoria, the last two days, so more competition for charging on the superchargers I guess. I was surprised at how low the top of the roof is on them. Couple of un-housed boys slamming beers outside of the liquor store were chatting one of the owners up. As much as I was tempted to check it out, I kept on walking to the bank.
 
Nice, the supercharger infrastructure on the island is getting better. I saw two Cybertrucks rolling around Victoria, the last two days, so more competition for charging on the superchargers I guess. I was surprised at how low the top of the roof is on them. Couple of un-housed boys slamming beers outside of the liquor store were chatting one of the owners up. As much as I was tempted to check it out, I kept on walking to the bank.
Icbc gave them truck license plates so it must be a truck! Or a Fancy smithrite dumpster
 
It'll be nice to have Tesla as another option. When I go to Whistler, I travel via Cache Ck and Pavillion because of no fast charging in Spences Bridge or Lytton. Cache Ck is located right on mid trip, but the BC Hydro chargers there are pretty slow. Tesla has 8 chargers just metres away, faster option and more of them.

Maybe BC Hydro will sort out its issues with the village of Spences Bridge and reopen fast chargers there. That route is slightly shorter in km and, more importantly, has less elevation gain and therefore less energy use.
 
It'll be nice to have Tesla as another option. When I go to Whistler, I travel via Cache Ck and Pavillion because of no fast charging in Spences Bridge or Lytton. Cache Ck is located right on mid trip, but the BC Hydro chargers there are pretty slow. Tesla has 8 chargers just metres away, faster option and more of them.

Maybe BC Hydro will sort out its issues with the village of Spences Bridge and reopen fast chargers there. That route is slightly shorter in km and, more importantly, has less elevation gain and therefore less energy use.
Co-op is installing lots over the island and interior right now. They're meant to fill the small town gaps I'm told.
 
Co-op is installing lots over the island and interior right now. They're meant to fill the small town gaps I'm told.
Logical choice to put them in existing gas stations. Drivers and passengers of EVs have the same needs as ICErs: coffee, drinks, snacks, air, windshield stuff, toilets. And refueling of course, just a different type of fuel. Gas station owners have lots of capital invested in their facilities, and the margins on non-fuel items are better than on gas and diesel anyway. Adapt by offering the new fuel choice as well as FF, and keep the non fuel profit coming in.

Standalone network like Electrify Canada and Tesla are positioned in strategic locations, and they have fast chargers, but mostly they have nothing else. Truly nothing else, not even a garbage can. Might be a toilet in an adjacent facility like a tourist info centre, but often these have limited hours. What's the point of a super fast charge when you still have to find somewhere else for a coffee and a pee stop?

Co-op and others like them can pick up some new business by offering modest speed charging on routes the big boys aren't yet servicing. BC Hydro and Flo are doing this already, but again the problem is no other facilities with them. All else being equal, I'd choose the gas station chargers.
 
The Tesla adapter works OK, but jeez the cables are short for a Lightning. They were designed of course for Tesla vehicles, which all have the charge point on the left rear corner. Back up to the charger and plug in. But with a Lightning, the charge port is a good metre back from the front corner of the truck. Good thing it has cameras and sensors up there, I had my bumper within an inch of the charger shroud before the cable would reach.

Nice feature is Ford has set up a plug and charge system like Tesla has. No need to download or configure yet another charging network app, it's already built into Fordpass. Plug in, wait a few seconds, charging begins. No need to open the app or press any buttons, you can watch progress on the dash of the truck if you wish. My spies tell me, though, that you can save a few cents per kWh by setting up a Tesla account and activating charging through their app.
 
Back
Top