Another option would be to check with the pod manufacturer and see if they have experience with the CAD / Technical drawings from outboard manufacturers. Would be nice to minimize the setback from a fishing perspective, however totally understand the desire to get the motors up out of the water when trimmed up for moorage.That commander is a beauty but the pod is not what I’m looking for….
Let’s keep that boat out of this thread unless the owner has some input.
Double check your bracket height. I take it you are using 25" shafts You want your cavitation plates 1' above the hull for every foot of set back of bracket. 36 " bracket min 3" above hull line. my 36" setback have engine 5" above hull and could go 1" higherWish I had the motors here… or some type of 250 to double check.
The one built is 42” to the motor mounting. Unless the motors tilt up into the space under the hump ( also add 1” for the guard rail ) , there is no way a standard or smaller pod will work. I’m sure a few inches can be knocked of if the motors tuck in under the hump a bit or kiss the hump, or tilt is adjusted. And yes I did add a couple inches to be s
Since Adrenalin and lordship agreed to make a pod for me, I haven’t thought too much about it.I’d be tempted to call a few shops that regularly build pods and tell them your leg length and ask what the common distance has been from transom to 250s. I would then add the depth of that step to whatever they say. I’m happy to snap pictures or put a tape to mine again for you if you need as long as you can convince Ron to drop the deck on mine too. Oh and ill need a shop too. Port boathouse may be able to tell you exactly what you need also.
If you have to mount your outboard 5" higher than normal, because your leg length is 5" too long, i.e. at 30" leg when a 25" is called for in a twin application... then the tilting power head, mounted 5" higher... will sweep a higher/longer arc increasing risk of hitting the transom / not clearing...Leg length does not dictate the setback, the power head is the same and that’s what’s tilting forwards. They will have the technical drawings will all the dimensions they need. leg length just sets your mounting height.
It doesn’t work that way, the fulcrum point does not change move it up/down still a set measurement. You would be tilting towards a higher location on the transom so if there’s something in the way clearance wise that would be your only concern. A jackplate would add setback and help the situation.If you have to mount your outboard 5" higher than normal, because your leg length is 5" too long, i.e. at 30" leg when a 25" is called for in a twin application... then the tilting power head, mounted 5" higher... will sweep a higher/longer arc increasing risk of hitting the transom / not clearing...
So while the leg length doesn't matter for performance if you can mount higher (or jackplate), it will affect the clearance between top of powerhead and back of transom wall.
As you suggest though, if the pod manufacture has the technical drawings they will be able to figure this out...
Good catch - now that I think about it you're right!It doesn’t work that way, the fulcrum point does not change move it up/down still a set measurement. You would be tilting towards a higher location on the transom so if there’s something in the way clearance wise that would be your only concern. A jackplate would add setback and help the situation.
Since Adrenalin and lordship agreed to make a pod for me, I haven’t thought too much about it.
I have heard only good things about them…
Will be putting the deck on soon !
A modest brow.With the right bow rail and roof rail design, this would look pretty good, sans flying bridge. Needs something though.
View attachment 82102