Aquaholic
Crew Member
Nah, redneck radar reflector.The motors are nice. The aluminum backing plate on the transom is a bonus! Or a warning sign?!
Nah, redneck radar reflector.The motors are nice. The aluminum backing plate on the transom is a bonus! Or a warning sign?!
I thought that's what the Lucky cans were for?!Nah, redneck radar reflector.
https://nanaimo.craigslist.org/boa/d/ladysmith-hewes-craft/7139371903.html - @Stizzla sorry buddy had to tag you in this nice little gem
https://nanaimo.craigslist.org/boa/d/ladysmith-hewes-craft/7139371903.html - @Stizzla sorry buddy had to tag you in this nice little gem
Cope 25' Quatsino Sound design with some mods I believe. Similar to "the beverle".
Seems like an honest reply. How do you value a rig like that?! There's a lot of function there, with a lot of equipment, but there's also so much risk of looming repairs. I guess that's the case for every boat to varying degrees....
Nice one! Thankshttps://nanaimo.craigslist.org/boa/d/ladysmith-hewes-craft/7139371903.html - @Stizzla sorry buddy had to tag you in this nice little gem
While I agree that it may be underpowered I don't think that twin 150's equal a single 300. Twins from my understanding result in something like 25% less power applied in the water. I went through this when I built my Northwest 27 but decided on twin 175's rather than a single 300 from the advice I received from those more in the know than myself.Ok then I’ll call it underpowered. The commander 26 needs more. Pretty heavy 26er. A lot more boat than most 26’ boats. Twin 150 is better than one 300 to get the ***** movin
I was talking about getting the boat moving. Two props under power will make it move faster. Once you’re moving it’s easy to keep the boat moving. There’s a weight trade-off with having two motors but I think having more prop turning is better than less prop to get the boat moving and planing.While I agree that it may be underpowered I don't think that twin 150's equal a single 300. Twins from my understanding result in something like 25% less power applied in the water. I went through this when I built my Northwest 27 but decided on twin 175's rather than a single 300 from the advice I received from those more in the know than myself.
Nice deal on the boat too.
Considering I sold my 92’ 215 with same vintage zuki 175 for $6500, one could imagine what I thought about it. And I rebuild the stringers/transom/floor/ rub rail rivets for bolts, yada yada yadaThe motors are nice. The aluminum backing plate on the transom is a bonus! Or a warning sign?!
Considering I sold my 92’ 215 with same vintage zuki 175 for $6500, one could imagine what I thought about it. And I rebuild the stringers/transom/floor/ rub rail rivets for bolts, yada yada yada
I’ve got the same boat with twin 200s. I think you are right. I think the added drag of two engines may eat some of the horsepower. My boat is identical to the other Commander but a little newer. My cruise is 5mph faster than his at the same rpm as well as top speed is about 5-7 more than his. Either way that’s a good deal in my opinion and the fact he went two stroke helps. Thats a torquey 300.While I agree that it may be underpowered I don't think that twin 150's equal a single 300. Twins from my understanding result in something like 25% less power applied in the water. I went through this when I built my Northwest 27 but decided on twin 175's rather than a single 300 from the advice I received from those more in the know than myself.
Nice deal on the boat too.
Sometimes I think I need a translation service for your posts...
What I think you're saying is that this era of Campion is prone to deterioration of the transom & stringers?
You're saying that you had a 1992 215 model with four-stroke Suzuki 175hp and you sold the whole rig for $6500?
So you're thinking that this 1994 185 model for $13,500 is overpriced?