“Seachoice” lost me in the second paragraph. Such an Act must also advance Indigenous sovereignty and reconciliation.
What exactly does that mean and what does it have to do with aquaculture?
Great questions, Terrin.
Federal Aquaculture Act
dfo-mpo.gc.ca
The "proposed" Aquaculture Act is something that the industry has been working on promoting to upper DFO staff for many years now - right after they lost the Morton Case in 2009. They knew the writing was on the wall and they didn't want to be regulated under the Fisheries Act, so they lobbied for their own friendlier act. One they make up for DFO. Because - isn't that how business is done?
Just like they are currently working behind the scenes now with the industry in developing the General Aquaculture Regulations (GARs) to implement this Act - and nobody else is invited to these extremely private and select sessions, as well. Because the regulations are where the rubber hits the road, as Acts are largely motherhood statements. If one can have exclusive access to how regulations are written - lobbyists can get what they want, and minimize embarrassing and troublesome regulations that might hinder what they want to do - like maybe public disease reporting.
That's exactly what happened with the Aquaculture Activities Regulations (AARs), as well - sea lice and diseases were supposed to be part of those regulations, but instead after working in secret with industry - the AARs released the industry from s. 36 of the Fisheries Act - release of a deleterious substance - which is what they wanted because they knew the well boats and baths were coming because the sea lice were becoming resistant to slice and they needed to switch treatments that left them with a hold of nasty chemicals and no easy way to dispose of those chemicals.
In 2010, the Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance (“CAIA”) wrote a letter to the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans (“DFO”) pushing for a separate federal aquaculture statute and clearer property rights for aquaculturists:
(
http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/206/30...OCALHOS/EXHIBITFILES/EXH_1626___CAN384486.ZIP).
This initiative was supported and driven up the ladder in DFO by upper-level DFO managers (e.g. Trevor Swerdfager & James Smith). I would bet they are tight with Timothy Sargent, the Deputy Minister:
Dear Senior DFO staff, I have read 12 years of your internal conversations about how you and your predecessors have suppressed the growing evidence that salmon farming is causing serious harm to wild salmon. Your emails are available through the Access to Information Act. I have come to the...
alexandramorton.typepad.com
From 2011 – 2015 DFO convened the National Aquaculture Strategic Action Plan Initiative (NASAPI):
https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/aquaculture/lib-bib/nasapi-inpasa/Report-eng.htm#a5
focused on “Harmonization” of legislation for aquaculture development through the rather exclusive and reclusive old boys club called the "Canadian Council of Fisheries and Aquaculture Ministers (CCFAM)."
By 2013 – Pamela Parker (executive director of the Atlantic Canada Fish Farmers Association) who also later testified at the Senate Committee hearings on aquaculture that proposed a new Aquaculture Act) was lobbying for a “New Aquaculture Strategy” by 2013.
And “co-incidentally” and totally "unrelatedly" (sarcasm):
From 2011 – 2015 The Senate convened the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans in order to examine and report on the regulation of aquaculture, current challenges and future prospects for the industry in Canada that tabled their report in 2016. One of those senator sons is a contractor for the same industry - Fabian Manning Jr leases two large boats as supply vessels to Northern Harvest Sea Farms aka Mowi for likely $10,000+/day. No conflicts of interest to declare here, folks! Another senator was "residential schools were actually good" Lynn Beyak (
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/lynn-beyak-suspended-second-time-1.5478536), along with "Canada will pay nearly half a million dollars in compensation to my nine employees" Don Meredith (
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/don-meredith-compensation-1.5761652). These were the "well-informed" brains behind the report, supposedly.
So substantial work on developing and promoting a proposed Aquaculture Act that would take the aquaculture industry away from complying with the existing Fisheries Act was carried-out for many years.
But this is instead how DFO Communications Branch framed the "consultations" on the Act:
How we got here
June 2016: Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans (SCOFO) tabled a report “An Ocean of Opportunities: Aquaculture in Canada”
and we'll just ignore all that back room politicking that's been going on for years - because the serfs might get unruly if we acknowledge that - and besides - that's just business, anyways. They don't need to know what really goes on in the castle.
Absolutely disgusting how they have to lie constantly to support this industry. There should be accountability for those actions. It's criminal, as far as I am concerned.