Maintain Priority Access to Chinook and Coho for the Canadian Public in a New Salmon Allocation Policy. Send Your Letter to DFO!

we should shoot back and ask for more sockeye, chum and pink limits. ask for dip netting and small gillnetting previsions for public harvest.

**** em

i mean they say its shared right

one good sockeye year for them generates 10+ years of revenue of what ever they would get from an increase in chinook and Coho.

your talking millions of pounds vs thousands
I wanna throw out a milk jug on every backeddy on the Fraser toooo!
 
we should shoot back and ask for more sockeye, chum and pink limits. ask for dip netting and small gillnetting previsions for public harvest.

**** em

i mean they say its shared right

one good sockeye year for them generates 10+ years of revenue of what ever they would get from an increase in chinook and Coho.

your talking millions of pounds vs thousands
Don't forget the halibut allocation which favors commercial 85%
 
And what is incorrect about this statement? When I started trolling on the west coast there were zero rec fisherman offshore. Now there is a full fleet complete with electronics, radar, riggers etc, heck they are even out in numbers on the tuna grounds. This has all happened in the last 30 years. Exceeds levels originally anticipated, (hard to argue this point).

Not buying what the Nuu-chah-nulth are selling though. Lots of bs in there position paper imo.
Regarding both the tuna and salmon offshore let's compare catch numbers. I can tell you after sitting in many meeting with the commercial fishers they seem to think they own a common property resource just because they have licence and from time time have to remind them about that very fact.
 
Last edited:
I agree with your point but just for arguments sake, they each paid $100K-$300k for their license back in the day to be able to fish from April 15-Oct. They also paid another 100K -500K for their boats. It was not an inexpensive fishery to buy in to and when they started there was not a sport/rec fisherman on the west coast of the island or the charlottes. So from their point of view, they paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for access to a resource that they no longer have much access too. Of course they are going to try their damnedest to hang on to the little bit they still have left.

That being said, the FN/commercial portion is partially ex commercial allocation gifted to them from the buyout and allocation gifted to them out of thin air. They want the rest of the commercial allocation, some more thin air stuff, and as much rec allocation as they can swindle. Once they get that, they and DFO will just continue to push for more. This will be a non stop battle moving forward.
 
Last edited:
I believe the rec harvest has went down when I looked at the numbers, or have remained pretty flat.

also pay attention to wording "in some regions"
Whose betting haida gwaii is one of their main targets? Maybe Tofino too as alhoustat (spelling?) has their commercial rights based fishery there.
 
The province has spoken now on this issue. Wow I think we are all doing a good job. It is very rare where the province gets involved in anything fisheries.

View attachment 124237

View attachment 124238
Please note the last sentence of this letter. If you haven't taken the time to write to the Provincial Government on this, between now and that meeting on Feb 9th would be a good time.
 
This is very huge. I will never vote bc NDP but happy to see this letter. It means something

Tbh I don’t think we get that letter from the province 6 months ago but I think some are finally waking up because of the Richmond land claim, words have consequences, putting undrip into law has consequences, removing common property from law has consequences.

Standing on a podium and saying saying your in First Nation land, is not just a feel good gesture that you then get to ignore and continue your day to day life.
 
Back
Top