I'm confused was I supposed to supply one? I was only asked for one video. I showed it.Where's your video of the industry risk-managing interactions with wild juvie salmon by identifying critical marine nearshore habitat, and staying away from these areas using agent-based modelling used in siting criteria, bones?
we know your confused.... the whale topic is another thread or if it concerns you so much start a new one. do yo have any input on fish farms? or will you keep coming here to change the topic?
how many warnings does adim have to give you? really what does a captain of a vessel have to do with fish farms killing off wild salmon??? wow
come to the table with a few facts in your pocket please, many questions have been asked and this is all you have? no answers?
Job opportunity for one of the Fish Farm supporters on this forum,
https://www.fishfarmingexpert.com/jobs/freelance-journalist-canada/
https://www.fishfarmingexpert.com/article/first-us-land-farmed-salmon-go-on-sale/
B.C. fish processing plants discharging effluent ‘lethal to fish,’ audit finds
https://thenarwhal.ca/b-c-fish-processing-plants-discharging-effluent-lethal-to-fish-audit-finds/
In consideration of the literature reviewed, we conclude that the risk of wild salmon contracting HSMI as a result of exposure to viral PRV particles from processing plant effluent is low. We base this assessment on the following observations: 1. Salmon in BC can have high levels of PRV and remain asymptomatic without compromise of physiological fitness, 2. Surveys of Pacific salmon positive for PRV have not disclosed impacts on fish health; the presence of PRV in salmon is not definitive of disease, 3. PRV predates the introduction of Atlantic salmon to BC and decades of fish health surveys have not reported HSMI in wild salmon, and 4. The threat posed to salmon by Norwegian strains strongly indicates that the BC strain is different and does not induce HSMI like the Norwegian strain. This assessment is based on review of the current literature and information available. There are research gaps and needs that are identified that will further refine the risk assessment when complete. ------ Used outdated PRV literature in their review then put in that disclaimer at the end to protect their reputation.
This is not correct. The current testing method can not distinguish between viruses which are alive or dead. This is why a positive prv test can come from effluent samples that have been disinfected.The audit pointed out that the only test method currently available for PRV involves detecting genetic material present in effluent, and that B.C. lacks adequate lab capacity to monitor and report on viruses.
”
WOW! That looks like something the PR firms pumped-out. Maybe they actually did.In consideration of the literature reviewed, we conclude that the risk of wild salmon contracting HSMI as a result of exposure to viral PRV particles from processing plant effluent is low. We base this assessment on the following observations: 1. Salmon in BC can have high levels of PRV and remain asymptomatic without compromise of physiological fitness, 2. Surveys of Pacific salmon positive for PRV have not disclosed impacts on fish health; the presence of PRV in salmon is not definitive of disease, 3. PRV predates the introduction of Atlantic salmon to BC and decades of fish health surveys have not reported HSMI in wild salmon, and 4. The threat posed to salmon by Norwegian strains strongly indicates that the BC strain is different and does not induce HSMI like the Norwegian strain. This assessment is based on review of the current literature and information available. There are research gaps and needs that are identified that will further refine the risk assessment when complete. ------ Used outdated PRV literature in their review then put in that disclaimer at the end to protect their reputation.
They also neglect to acknowledge the real physiological effects that can and do happen (lesions, jaundice) that happen AFTER the virus disappears from the hosts body.
They neglect to mention that ther BC strain is very closely related to the Norwegian strain and could only plausibly get here through the FF industry. Instead they state: "The threat posed to salmon by Norwegian strains strongly indicates that the BC strain is different and does not induce HSMI like the Norwegian strain".
How would BC wild salmon fish get a Norwegian strain of PRV found in Atlantic farmed salmon?Where did you get this part about a virus disappearing. Its the first I hear of this.
How do you know that the norwegian strain isn't from BC?
The virus disappears?They also neglect to acknowledge the real physiological effects that can and do happen (lesions, jaundice) that happen AFTER the virus disappears from the hosts body.