A couple of boats ago, I put a 4 blade PowerTech on my single DF300 Suzuki which was hung on a 24 Skagit Orca. It seemed to have a better hole shot, never broke loose in rough water etc etc. Generally a good re-prop experience. But one day I hit a rock in Central Coast and put the older 3 blade back on....it blew my mind when I saw a 9% INCREASE in fuel efficiency with the 3 blade
Mind you that 4 blade was a huge prop: 16” x 17P stainless....heavy!
I’ve been thinking of going to 4 blades on the twin DF300’s on my latest boat for better stern lift but that experience with a drop in fuel efficiency spooks me. I’m already dealing with big fuel burn on that boat
Not trying to derail the thread but I get the feeling that the design and weight of the boat is an important factor as to the relative outcome you achieve when making the switch from a 3 blade to a 4 blade
Case in point: yesterday I discussed 3 blades and 4 blades with the head dude at Seasport....this guy has years of experience building these boats, hanging power on the transoms, propping the outboards, then test driving them.
His comment: he has seen almost zero tangible benefits of going from a 3 blade to a 4 blade ... lots of different boats—-Orcas, Seasports, C-sports etc ——that blew my mind as it flies in the face of everything I read on this site and Hull Truth etc etc
So the upshot seems to be: your results will vary depending on what you’re driving
I’d be interested to hear your comments, Ship Hap.....