Maintain Priority Access to Chinook and Coho for the Canadian Public in a New Salmon Allocation Policy. Send Your Letter to DFO!

I stopped into Pages resort and Silva bay marina this morning to see if they were aware of the proposed SAP changes. Neither place had heard about it.

If you have a marina/other business you frequent that may not be aware of this, maybe stop in and have a chat with them.
Thanks, excellent way to organically spread the word and help folks who are either directly dependent on the recreational fishery for their business wellness and/or who participate in the fishery. Imagine what would happen if everyone paid a visit to all the businesses that they purchase goods or services from for going fishing or boating - and encouraged those folks to send a letter to the Fisheries Minister.

Government decision-makers need to be shown via letters from potentially impacted businesses what is actually at stake - jobs, business survival, GDP for Canada and local coastal communities.

While the DFO public consultation process ends Jan 23 - don't lose sight that all those letters will be summarized by DFO staff and eventually a watered down version will be part of a decision request package sent to the Fisheries Minister. Here's where everyone should be prepared for a pivot. Write your MP and the Fisheries Minister - or better yet pay them a visit.
 
Kind of sad that this thread isn't getting more notice, especially given that this is a fishing site. Perhaps, us recreational fishermen in BC don't really understand the issue or are thinking that nothing can be done?

Everyone needs to:
1) Educate themselves on this issue.
2) Tell everyone they know about it whether they are fishermen or not.
3) Write to the PM, DFO, your MP, your MLA, your Mayor and apprise them of the issue - yes, it's Federal jurisdiction but the economic impacts are immense and are local.

There won't be much point in having a Sportfishing BC site if saltwater fishing opportunities are so limited that it becomes pointless.

FYI, a representative of the Sidney Anglers Association will be live on CFAX 1070 radio in Victoria at 7:50 am on Monday to discuss the issue and hopefully get the word out to the general public.
 
I have sent a couple emails to Jill Bennett of CKNW in Van as she has covered closures before but have not heard back unfortunately.
 
tQpuMuQ.jpeg


8XauraL.jpeg


Take Action Now Before Your Rights are Extinguished Forever

Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is considering eliminating the principle that salmon are a public resource to be managed for the benefit of all Canadians in its new Salmon Allocation Policy.

First Nations are asking DFO to eliminate this principle from the policy that will guide allocation of salmon among First Nations Food, Ceremonial and Social fisheries, First Nations treaty-based fisheries, non-Indigenous recreational fishers, and commercial fisheries.

The changes proposed are a radical shift in the principles that govern conservation and access to public resources, removing existing recreational fishing opportunities, and curtailing public access to salmon.

Concerned Canadians can email their objections and suggestions to DFO at DFO.SAPreviewBC-PASRevueBC.MPO@dfo-mpo.gc.ca

The deadline to respond is January 23, 2026.

Learn more here: fishingrights.ca

Read the DFO discussion paper here: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Discussion Paper
https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...iew+Discussion+Paper_05-Dec-25+end+Jan+23.pdf
https://bcwf.bc.ca/salmon/

There is a great deal of background and related information in the above cited link.

This is deadly serious folks!

Time is closing in to get your thoughts and comments in...
 
I stopped into Pages resort and Silva bay marina this morning to see if they were aware of the proposed SAP changes. Neither place had heard about it.

If you have a marina/other business you frequent that may not be aware of this, maybe stop in and have a chat with them.
Thanks, excellent way to organically spread the word and help folks who are either directly dependent on the recreational fishery for their business wellness and/or who participate in the fishery. Imagine what would happen if everyone paid a visit to all the businesses that they purchase goods or services from for going fishing or boating - and encouraged those folks to send a letter to the Fisheries Minister.

Government decision-makers need to be shown via letters from potentially impacted businesses what is actually at stake - jobs, business survival, GDP for Canada and local coastal communities.

Both of these are great ideas that I hadn’t thought of, little different here in Kamloops but I will still be swinging by Casting Loops and Canadian Tire (quite a active/good sporting goods manager) to drop off some print outs, vested parties are a great way to get to the folks not on social media/members of organizations.
I’ll also poke our local fish and game club membership to add some letter writing encouragement to the BCWF messaging they have already received.
 
Quick query, I’ve been a long time BCWF / local Fish and Game member (from the interior) but what are the other associations/organizations where membership is important and they have some stroke in advocacy? Is it primarily the public fisheries alliance? I see south Vancouver island coalition as well but haven’t taken the time to understand linkages between various groups
 
Longtime reader and lurker on this site. Honestly, the ad format is too infuriating. Nonetheless I have fired off a letter to DFO regarding SAP. I don’t think DFO has our best interests at heart - have they ever? Any RCA closure insights to share? I’ve only lived on the Island for 3 years, so I’m relying on what I read, chats with neighbours, and people I fish with. The biggest concern for me is the continued erosion of our rec fishing opportunities, with no end in sight. Cheers.
 
The deadline to write your SAP letter is coming up soon on January 23, 2026.

Learn more here: fishingrights.ca and use this link to have your form letter (can be edited/personalized if you wish) sent automatically to the top 3 important email addresses; DFO Salmon Allocation Policy Review Team, The Honorable Joanne Thompson (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans) and Clifford Small (Shadow Minister for Fisheries).

Thank-you to all those who have taken the time to do this !
 
Thanks to all the work that our many advocates do! I've drafted my letter, which is a little more personal... adding it here in hopes that it inspires a few more folks to write (also open to feedback, particularly references). I did debate including a few pictures, no idea if that would make it any more meaningful.

Attention Salmon Allocation Policy Team,

I am writing to express sincere concern about proposed negative impacts to my family, friends, hundreds of thousands of Canadian residents, and even visitors to our county; people who would lose the ability to experience the magnificent public resources that we have in Pacific Ocean. I fear for society as a whole, honestly, who are becoming increasingly distanced from the real world. Connection with the outdoors, our natural environment, the circle of life, understanding of where food comes from, weather, effort, challenge and reward is something so important to more people and for more reasons than can be effectively articulated in this short letter.

Reduction in public opportunity to access salmon has already, and will continue to have real and dire impacts. This fishery and opportunity means so much more than simply filling ones freezer. My ability to share the outdoors with my 3 kids, spouse, cousins, grandparents and friends has made an invaluable impact on our lives; provided enjoyment, good healthy food, a sense of challenge, win, loss, adrenaline and taught important life lessons. The outdoor experience is not limited to salmon, there are bottom fish, crabs, shrimp, even clams, sunshine, waves, whales, seals, birds, the list goes on and on, but there is a keystone species that builds the foundation of our spectacular west coast; the pacific salmon. The ocean is truly a phenomenal place, to remove or further restrict public access and opportunity in effort to serve a very small handful of business people (already subsidized commercial fishing) or trade it away as a reconciliation card to an small minority of the Canadian population is not consistent with your duty. Less opportunity will mean fewer people on the water and yield much collateral damage.

There will certainly be deep social and economic impacts from removing access and opportunity to the backbone of our west coast. The benefits of the recreational fishery are well published and articulated by the Sport Fishing Advisory Board, the Public Fishery Alliance, the BC Wildlife Federation, with referenceable research and science regarding the sustainable public use of the resource and positive impact to GDP, which benefits everyone living in Canada. I am in full support of their messages, as referenced below. I am also here as a 3rd generation Canadian and father of 3, to articulate that the passion, enjoyment and intangible benefits of public access run extremely deep. Many Canadians are not unlike the Indigenous population, feeling a deep and primal connection to this place we call home; we want and need the opportunity as real people to access salmon. I remind the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and Federal Government, of their fundamental obligation; to make decisions that serve the public interest, resources and broad societal concerns, which does include reduction of salmon allocation to the public.

Specific feedback on the draft Policy includes:

No - to re-allocation of Recreational Salmon to Commercial of First Nations

No - to gifting Recreational salmon allocations to subsidize commercial fisheries to help make them economically viable.

No - to giving control over who determines salmon allocations to local sub-area salmon allocation boards that are controlled by stakeholder groups who have vested interests as competing harvesters - this proposed concept will not ensure independent fairness in allocation decision-making. We must maintain coast-wide fishery planning through the DFO led IFMP process.

Yes - to maintaining conservation and Common Property management as key objectives of the SAP.

Yes - to maintaining 1999 Recreational priority for Chinook & Coho.

Yes - to a fair one-time retirement buy-out for all remaining commercial salmon fishers (and commercial allocations) with that salmon allocation being distributed to both Recreational and FN’s FSC.

Reference:

SPORT FISHING ADVISORY BOARD (“SFAB”) SALMON ALLOCATION POLICY REVIEW ALLOCATION STRATEGY SUMMARY AND SUPPORTING APPENDICES, April 2025

https://bcwf.bc.ca/salmon/

fishing rights.ca

Sport Fishing Institute of British Columbia, https://www.sportfishing.bc.ca/
 
Thanks for sharing your letter- I appreciate the description of how a change to the SAP as it relates to recreational priority over commercial for Chinook and Coho potentially impacts your connection to salmon and our marine environment.
 
This is where ChatGPT comes in very handy to help take core points from others and personalize it for your own feedback:

Dear Minister Thompson,

I am writing as a coastal British Columbian to express concern about the proposed changes to the 1999 Salmon Allocation Policy. As proposed, these changes risk reducing public access to Chinook and Coho salmon in favour of reallocation to other sectors.

For many of us, fishing is not a hobby but a core part of coastal life and community. The 1999 policy rightly recognizes salmon as a common property resource managed on behalf of all Canadians, and access should only be reduced when conservation truly requires it.

You only need spend some time on a boat in BC’s coastal waters or even read some of the BC specific internet fishing forums to see that recreational anglers have consistently supported conservation through licence funding, volunteer hatchery and habitat work, and widespread catch and release practices. We are partners in recovery, not an obstacle to it. Reallocation does not address the real threats to salmon, including habitat loss, climate impacts, pinniped predation, and mixed stock bycatch.

I respectfully urge you to uphold the core principles of the 1999 policy, maintain recreational priority for Chinook and Coho, and ensure decisions remain science based and conservation driven.

Thank you for your time and consideration.
 
Letter sent and info sent to all of my fishing buddies.
We are screwed if this goes thru!

Admin why was this never pinned in What's New or New Posts?

@Admin i agree and was contemplating starting a thread in the general discussion forum.
In general, I monitor activity on the forum through the ‘what’s new’ lightning bolt at the top (I’m not sorting through individual forum groups), which none of the conservation and management posts show up in. Perhaps there was prior agreement that most folks don’t want a bunch of politics in their feed, but I think this and similar posts are critical and need to be in peoples face - perhaps that would get a little more action/active discussion. I know my time is much better spent thinking about our future than ‘what I had for supper last night’ (no offence to that thread, it is great).
 
Just passing this on. I saw this posted online via Facebook groups page. It's public knowledge, and this letter has been sent to DFO. IMAWG is a participant of the SAP roundtable process for First Nations.

View attachment 123978


View attachment 123979

Two observations regarding this letter:
1) The actual intents and desires of FNs in the SAP review are not clarified
2) As a result this looks like simply playing the race card to shut down dissenting positions
 
Back
Top