halibut report

juandesooka

Active Member
Opening day tomorrow....who will be the first to post a halibut catch this year? I read about a 30 pounder caught on salmon gear earlier this week in Sooke, and released....so they are there.

Weather looks decent tomorrow in Sooke-Victoria, then some big weather coming for the rest of the week. Though oddly enough, a little bubble of low winds predicted off Sooke.

Anyways, looking forward to the first report.
 
-28*,+20kph winds!
I will be awaiting reports, with bated breath. ;-(

GOOD LUCK and FISH SAFE everyone!
 
Drove from Langford to Brentwood this morning, passed 8 boats going the other way with big ol scotchmans in the boat....... Im so jealous. Thats my report.
 
Brave souls, it's blowing southeast 20knots right now.

One of the sales points that the slipper skippers used when they twisted the arms of DFO to gift them the 88% halibut quota was that the uncertainty and short opening style of commercial fishery resulted in a gold rush mentality leading to increased risk and put commercial halibut fishermen lives at risk. That could have been resolved be giving them individual allocation rather than transferrable ownership, but of course that would not have resulted in the creation of instant lottery winner millionaires who could then quit fishing and watch the money roll in forever.

By grossly under allocating the recreational share of the halibut fishery it would appear that they have simply transferred that risk and more to the recreational sector. There is no more dangerous activity in recreational tidal water fishing than deep water off shore anchoring for halibut. Push the envelope, go when the current and the weather is not as good as it should be, or stay a little to long when the current picks up and you can end up in serious trouble or even dead. That is why most keep a knife handy to try and cut themselves free from the anchor line when their boat starts to go under. Ironically recreational anglers use much smaller boats than the commercials and anchor which makes the risk all the greater. That is also why Recreational anglers are so opposed to the recent reduction to one halibut a day from two. It just makes no sense to accept all the costs and risk even under the best circumstances to catch only one halibut.

You can see it happening right before our eyes in the previous posts. When seasons are reduced and anglers have the sense that their fishing opportunities are being reduced it is unfortunately human nature to push the envelope perhaps a little more than one should. Why is it that our Federal politicians and DFO are so willing to endanger recreational anglers by their ill-conceived policies when they were not willing to do so for professional commercial crews in large boats? If just one angler is injured or dies because of our federal politicians pig headed stubbornness in refusing to address the unfair halibut allocation issue, then Harper and Shea will have blood on their hands. Save some money for lawyers to represent us at the Coroner’s Inquest and be prepared to fry the politicians.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Too much for us. Breaking waves everywhere and then they upgrade from storm to hurricane warning.

I turned around and came home.

It was ****** hard to do, but didn't feel safe.
 
One of the sales points that the slipper skippers used when they twisted the arms of DFO to gift them the 88% halibut quota was that the uncertainty and short opening style of commercial fishery resulted in a gold rush mentality leading to increased risk and put commercial halibut fishermen lives at risk. That could have been resolved be giving them individual allocation rather than transferrable ownership, but of course that would not have resulted in the creation of instant lottery winner millionaires who could then quit fishing and watch the money roll in forever.

By grossly under allocating the recreational share of the halibut fishery it would appear that they have simply transferred that risk and more to the recreational sector. There is no more dangerous activity in recreational tidal water fishing than deep water off shore anchoring for halibut. Push the envelope, go when the current and the weather is not as good as it should be, or stay a little to long when the current picks up and you can end up in serious trouble or even dead. That is why most keep a knife handy to try and cut themselves free from the anchor line when their boat starts to go under. Ironically recreational anglers use much smaller boats than the commercials and anchor which makes the risk all the greater. That is also why Recreational anglers are so opposed to the recent reduction to one halibut a day from two. It just makes no sense to accept all the costs and risk even under the best circumstances to catch only one halibut.

You can see it happening right before our eyes in the previous posts. When seasons are reduced and anglers have the sense that their fishing opportunities are being reduced it is unfortunately human nature to push the envelope perhaps a little more than one should. Why is it that our Federal politicians and DFO are so willing to endanger recreational anglers by their ill-conceived policies when they were not willing to do so for professional commercial crews in large boats? If just one angler is injured or dies because of our federal politicians pig headed stubbornness in refusing to address the unfair halibut allocation issue, then Harper and Shea will have blood on their hands. Save some money for lawyers to represent us at the Coroner’s Inquest and be prepared to fry the politicians.

My thoughts too- Just like the old days -Commercial opening Derby style-
To bad that DFO has put us in this position ;(
 
Back safe and sound, actually it was flat calm where we were, but felt a little uneasy about being out there when they upgraded to hurricane warnings for the south island.

Now for a fish report we got a 40 a 25 and let one go around 25lbs and lotsssssss of dogfish.So many dogs that we got all our fish on grubs. I'll try and get some pics up in a bit.
 
YEAH I heard that to Tev we bailed as well, fishing was good for us as well and yeah whats with the DOGS damn going to need more hooks and biat if that keeps up got to get the fish ready having a feast tonight.......

Wolf
 
One of the sales points that the slipper skippers used when they twisted the arms of DFO to gift them the 88% halibut quota was that the uncertainty and short opening style of commercial fishery resulted in a gold rush mentality leading to increased risk and put commercial halibut fishermen lives at risk. That could have been resolved be giving them individual allocation rather than transferrable ownership, but of course that would not have resulted in the creation of instant lottery winner millionaires who could then quit fishing and watch the money roll in forever.

By grossly under allocating the recreational share of the halibut fishery it would appear that they have simply transferred that risk and more to the recreational sector. There is no more dangerous activity in recreational tidal water fishing than deep water off shore anchoring for halibut. Push the envelope, go when the current and the weather is not as good as it should be, or stay a little to long when the current picks up and you can end up in serious trouble or even dead. That is why most keep a knife handy to try and cut themselves free from the anchor line when their boat starts to go under. Ironically recreational anglers use much smaller boats than the commercials and anchor which makes the risk all the greater. That is also why Recreational anglers are so opposed to the recent reduction to one halibut a day from two. It just makes no sense to accept all the costs and risk even under the best circumstances to catch only one halibut.

You can see it happening right before our eyes in the previous posts. When seasons are reduced and anglers have the sense that their fishing opportunities are being reduced it is unfortunately human nature to push the envelope perhaps a little more than one should. Why is it that our Federal politicians and DFO are so willing to endanger recreational anglers by their ill-conceived policies when they were not willing to do so for professional commercial crews in large boats? If just one angler is injured or dies because of our federal politicians pig headed stubbornness in refusing to address the unfair halibut allocation issue, then Harper and Shea will have blood on their hands. Save some money for lawyers to represent us at the Coroner’s Inquest and be prepared to fry the politicians.

you have 135km winds on the north end of the island and a hurricane warning out for the south island and you want to blame politicians for someones poor decision to head out "sports" fishing. Give your head a shake man there is no grounds to stand on under the heading of complete stupidity. The commies were given an 8 day season to make their living, far cry from recreational fishing,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
you have 135km winds on the north end of the island and a hurricane warning out for the south island and you want to blame politicians for someones poor decision to head out "sports" fishing. Give your head a shake man there is no grounds to stand on under the heading of complete stupidity. The commies were given an 8 day season to make their living, far cry from recreational fishing,

Race Rocks ENE 10 ain't exactly a hurricane.

I think you miss Rockfish's point ... compressing the rec season will give exactly the same kind of motivation as the compression of the commercial season used to. On those marginal call days, where the forecast isn't great but it isn't that bad, the "fish it while it's open" attitude will encourage people to go when they might not otherwise. Speaking for myself, when a swiftsure is planned and all the prep work done, it is really tough to call it off because of weather. Knowing the season might be closed next week, so it's the last shot at halibut for the year, could be a factor in making a foolish decision. If disaster were to follow, the policy would certainly be a contributor. [though I doubt actionable legally]
 
Back safe and sound, actually it was flat calm where we were, but felt a little uneasy about being out there when they upgraded to hurricane warnings for the south island.

Now for a fish report we got a 40 a 25 and let one go around 25lbs and lotsssssss of dogfish.So many dogs that we got all our fish on grubs. I'll try and get some pics up in a bit.

Heard lots of Dogs up here also, must be some bait around. Nice work,
 
you have 135km winds on the north end of the island and a hurricane warning out for the south island and you want to blame politicians for someones poor decision to head out "sports" fishing. Give your head a shake man there is no grounds to stand on under the heading of complete stupidity. The commies were given an 8 day season to make their living, far cry from recreational fishing,

I am not surprised by your excessive reaction. It is a perfectly valid argument and one made by more than myself including at some of the community forums. Of course you are afraid of this argument; it puts pressure on the politicians and increases the probability that they will resolve the allocation issue fairly. That is something you desperately do not want since the slipper skippers stand to lose a small amount of your unfair allocation; unless you can make a huge profit on it by being paid and greed just won’t allow that, hence the snorting, blowing and bluster to deflect away from the argument. The issue is of course not just this once a year coming hurricane. I don’t think you will find very many out fishing in it. The issue is that compression and reduction of sport fishing opportunities can reasonably be expected (unfortunately) to be a factor when decisions are made about when to fish and how long to stay. It should not happen but given human nature, it will.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
By grossly under allocating the recreational share of the halibut fishery it would appear that they have simply transferred that risk and more to the recreational sector.

-Ironically recreational anglers use much smaller boats than the commercials and anchor which makes the risk all the greater. That is also why Recreational anglers are so opposed to the recent reduction to one halibut a day from two. It just makes no sense to accept all the costs and risk even under the best circumstances to catch only one halibut.

-When seasons are reduced and anglers have the sense that their fishing opportunities are being reduced it is unfortunately human nature to push the envelope perhaps a little more than one should. Why is it that our Federal politicians and DFO are so willing to endanger recreational anglers by their ill-conceived policies when they were not willing to do so for professional commercial crews in large boats? If just one angler is injured or dies because of our federal politicians pig headed stubbornness in refusing to address the unfair halibut allocation issue, then Harper and Shea will have blood on their hands. Save some money for lawyers to represent us at the Coroner’s Inquest and be prepared to fry the politicians.

To the south the derby mentalitiy is a perfect example of your concern. In washington's northern coastal areas the season is based off of quota that is only expected to last 5-10 days, and it causes some to "push that envelope", as for example the 2008 La Push Halibut opener in 2008.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/362998_rescue14.html
 
Back
Top