No matter what kind of ban introduced, the only people who will have the banned item are criminals. Law abiding citizens will not have any.
If guns kill people,,,.Then
pencils miss spel words.
Cars make people drive drunk.
Spoons made Rosie O'donnal fat
McCrystal said it all the other day: '...the military style weapons fire the .223 round at 3,000 FPS. it was designed to kill people and it is devastating in its effectness. no one in the public needs access to one of these weapons...'
so even this macho man is speaking out at this point. we may be crossing the rubicon with the NRA at long last. now also consider that something like 70% of the actual membership supports background checks for all purchases along with a waiting period. only the NRA lobby is opposed, guess why.....
guns don't kill people, people with guns do!
Every gun used in these mass shootings has been legally owned. So yes a ban on certain types of guns/magazines would have kept them out of the hands of the shooters.
Simpleton logic at its finest. Pencils are not designed to miss spell words - Assualt weapons ARE design to kill human beings. So when a shooter uses one to kill people he is using it EXACTLY how the manufacture has intended. When you misspell your name with a pencil that's just you being dumb, the manufacture of the pencil did not design it for misspellings.
And yes you can kill a person with anything, your bare hands even. The point is not to ban everything that can kill people but to ban weapons that are designed to kill people - do you see the difference?
Holy cow....This is just asking for trouble.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2013/01/10/bc-washington-gun-sales.html
I would hate to see how you interpret the bible.
only if you're a "believer" - that books' nuttier then gun nuts.
Not really meant it that way Poppa, I was just insinuating that no matter what you ban the wrong people will have it anyways.
Besides no body can match the USA for their adoration of weapons.
ah I see what you mean, i understand the thought but I don't agree with it. I think humans are creatures of opportunity. But again the mass shootings aren't related to street crime or career criminals and the guns aren't illegal weapons, the last kids mom legally bought them. So if she didn't buy the guns and he was too young to buy them himself, where was he going to get them? Its not a stretch to think he might not have gone on the rampage if there weren't guns within arms reach.
Its not a stretch to think he might not have gone on the rampage if there weren't guns within arms reach.