fish farm siting criteria & politics

Well im very very good friends with the guy and he flat told me he is contracted by the fish farm just to run a boat and thats it he has no vested intrest what so ever hes hauling plan and simple.
You dont need to lecure me on ethics my friend I worked in prison for 11 years and trust me you have to very very quiet about alot of things.

but I wont be quiet about this thanks and have a good day


wolf
 
The Vancouver Sun, 5th February 2009

First nations sue over salmon
Class action cites damage caused by aquaculture to wild fish stocks


Larry Pynn

Aboriginal people in the broughton archipelago off northeastern vancouver island launched a class-action lawsuit wednesday against the b.C. Government for damages caused by salmon farming to wild stocks.

"We are focusing on the health of the wild salmon," Chief Bob Chamberlain of the Kwicksutaineuk Ah-Kwa-Mish First Nation said in an interview. "We have an obligation to look after our resources."

Chamberlain said the B.C. Supreme Court class-action suit involves a total of eight first nations in the area concerned about the detrimental impact of open-net salmon farming on wild stocks.

He said the class action is a last resort based on years of frustration over the province not addressing aboriginal concerns about salmon farms, 29 of which are authorized in the area.

"The province's approach can be characterized by three words -- delay, deny, distract," he said.

The salmon-farming industry has been the subject of long-standing concerns related to issues such as transmission of sea lice and disease to wild stocks, as well as pollution, and the escape of non-native Atlantic salmon into the wild.

The class action is seeking:

- A declaration that the way the province has authorized and regulated salmon farms has contributed to a significant decline in the wild salmon stocks and infringed on natives' constitutional fishing rights.

- An injunction prohibiting the issuing of salmon aquaculture permits in the Broughton Archipelago pending adequate consultation and accommodation with natives.

- A declaration that the province must remediate the impact of salmon farms on wild salmon.

B.C. Wilderness Tourism Association president Brian Gunn applauded the class-action suit, saying senior governments "refuse to accept that salmon farms, as they currently operate, are causing irreparable damage to our wild salmon stocks."

Gunn said association members have observed grizzly bears seeking to bulk up for hibernation unable to find enough salmon to eat. "The B.C. tourism industry relies on healthy wild salmon populations to sustain their businesses, whether they are fishing lodges or wildlife viewing operations."

The class-action lawsuit precedes the release today of a report by the Pacific Salmon Forum, a body appointed by the provincial government, on the fate of wild salmon stocks, including the impact of aquaculture and sea lice.

Release of the forum's report had been delayed out of respect for the Jan. 20 death of Stan Hagen, the minister of agriculture and lands, who had responsibility for aquaculture.

Hagen's replacement, Ron Cantelon, MLA for Nanaimo-Parksville, said he found the timing of the class action curious -- one day before the forum report -- and said he would prefer negotiation over lawsuits.

Mary Ellen Walling, executive director of the B.C. Salmon Farmers Association, could not be reached for comment.

http://www.canada.com/First+Nation+sues+province+over+impact+Broughton+fish+farms/1256249/story.html
 
News Release

For Immediate Release
February 5, 2009

Salmon Forum finds management of BC waters must be shifted to an ecosystem basis to sustain both wild and farmed salmon

Vancouver, BC – Following four years of research and dialogue, the BC Pacific Salmon Forum today released its Final Report and Recommendations on what needs to be done to improve understanding of the economic, social and environmental sustainability of BC wild salmon stocks and salmon aquaculture on the coast. The Forum found wild salmon face unprecedented threats to both oceans and freshwater habitats due to climate change and watershed impacts as a result of human activity.

The Forum’s report acknowledges concerns expressed about the impacts of salmon farming on wild salmon. The Forum believes that salmon farming and wild salmon can coexist only if farms are rigorously managed in accordance with its recommended ecosystem thresholds.

The 95-page report includes 16 recommendations for the provincial government over the next four years to help achieve the Premier’s goal of having ‘the best managed fisheries bar none’.

Forum Chair, John Fraser said, “Although we recognize that the current economic downturn may require some flexibility in this timeframe, we are looking to the Government of British Columbia to enact the appropriate legislative and regulatory measures to ensure implementation of our recommendations.”

Fraser noted that some initial steps have already been announced by the Province, such as Living Water Smart BC, the government’s plan that identifies actions to help to keep the watersheds healthy.

The Forum’s report says the current system of watershed governance is inadequate to address the complexity of today’s resource decisions and changes in climate over the coming decades. It recommends that watersheds and marine environments be managed holistically as ecosystems supported by indicators to gauge their health and ensure that water and land decisions are made within ecosystem capacities.

The BC Pacific Salmon Forum is an initiative of the Government of BC announced by Premier Campbell in December 2004, with the mandate of providing the direction required to enable the Province to realize the vision to sustain viable wild and farmed salmon sectors.

Under the leadership of the Chair, Honourable John Fraser, the Forum members include six appointed members from a variety of backgrounds who are well informed about fisheries issues. The Forum was assisted by the guidance of an independent multi-disciplinary Science Advisory Committee.

For more information on the Final Report and Recommendations click on the link above to read the backgrounder that accompanied this media release.

MEDIA CONTACT:

John A. Fraser, Chair
BC Pacific Salmon Forum
250.755.3036

Pamela Parker, Managing Director
BC Pacific Salmon Forum
250.755.3036

SUMMARY OF BC PACIFIC SALMON FORUM FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS

An ecosystem-based approach will require a change in governance including:

* A restructuring of Provincial management of coastal waters and watersheds beginning with creation of a single Water and Land Agency to oversee all development and resource industry decisions in BC watersheds to safeguard ecological health
* Creation of a new Regulatory Oversight Authority to audit the province’s regulatory processes to provide public confidence that decisions that affect watersheds are being made in accordance with ecosystem-based indicators and reports its finding to the public
* Creation of a Science Secretariat to manage future research required to support salmon sustainability
* Increased collaboration between all levels of government – federal, provincial, First Nations and local – in the governance of watersheds

Key recommendations in managing salmon farming:

* Establishment of sea lice levels on wild fish based on natural background conditions to ensure wild salmon populations are not impacted by fish farms
* An annual limit of 18,500 tonnes of total farmed salmon production in the Broughton Archipelago as a precautionary approach with similar limits on annual production in all other salmon farming areas while the Province works with industry to implement an ecosystem based approach to management of aquaculture. These precautionary limits could be adjusted if it is demonstrated that ecosystem-based environmental thresholds are being met.
* Encouragement of technical innovation in salmon farming to reduce its ecological impact, including polyculture (growing of finfish, shellfish and marine plants together) and a commercial-scale pilot project to test closed containment salmon farming
* The Forum and its Science Advisory Committee are also supporting a proposal, endorsed by the companies operating fish farms in the Broughton, to implement and evaluate a coordinated area management plan (CAMP) to test the effectiveness of annually providing a migratory route free of farm-generated lice for out-migrating wild salmon smolts.

http://www.pacificsalmonforum.ca/final/BCPSFFinRptqSm.pdf
 
Quote from latest BC Salmon Forum report:

"There is strong indirect evidence that salmon farms in the Broughton Archipelago, and elsewhere on the BC Coast, contribute sea lice to wild juvenile pink and chum salmon...Evidence of increased lice around farms is apparent from the difference in numbers of planktonic lice stages found near and distant from farms" p. 40 & p. 76-79

"...Together these lines of inquiry have produced a very strong weight of evidence that salmon farms can contribute sea lice to juvenile pink and chum salmon" p. 77
 
quote:Originally posted by chris73

From what I see here this study was a waste of money!

The Pacific Salmon Forum's report was actually based on a number of studies - but I find the report's conclusions incredulous in that they mostly only reference the studies that the PSF has directly funded - and somehow have managed to NOT</u> find or reference many other peer-reviewed studies that suggest more than causal relationships and meek cautions to the risks imposed by the open net-cage technology.

We have already discussed many of those studies already on this thread - and I find it hard to believe that this Sportsfishing forum and thread is way more informative in certain regards than this recently-released PSF report, with all their capacity.

So from that perspective - ya, I agree with you Chris73. The PSF has worked itself into another redundant lap-puppy for the provincial and federal governments and the destructive industry they protect.
 
Agent,

Didn't the PSF put forward specific criteria for any study to be funded that is it had to be well founded in scientific principles, and not to generate media hype?

Wolf,

I wasn't questioning your ethics, just commentging that sometimes wshat people think is happening and what is actually going on are not the same thing. People sometimes like to embellish stories to make them seem better, like media types.
 
Well sockeye have I ever???
it felt like you were trying to say im dishonest or something this is something that is not right BUT I am not trying to imbelish this at all

Good luck Wolf

Blue Wolf Charters
www.bluewolfcharters.com
 
I took the time to read the report and I don't think it was a waste of money. It won't make everyone happy, but if the recommendations are followed by Campbell and crew, there might be light at the end of the tunnel for BC wild salmon. And BC salmon aquaculture too.
 
quote:Originally posted by agentaqua

Originally posted by sockeyefry

Agent,

Didn't the PSF put forward specific criteria for any study to be funded that is it had to be well founded in scientific principles, and not to generate media hype?
Maybe you misunderstand where my frustration is coming from.

If you look through the references they use, and have a reasonably intimate and current knowledge of the peer-reviewed works published on the interactions between wild and cultured stocks (which I know you do as well, sockeyefry - along with many others on this forum)...

... it is gratingly obvious that they are being as obtrusive as they can when they fleetingly and quietly state recommendations based solely on the most current work that the PSF (only has covered) - where possibly the few rare outside studies are scarcely mentioned - they are then quietly critiqued using irrelevant statements. Want examples? Okay here's a few...

[the study] "by Ford and Myers (2008), which included additional impacts not relevant to the Broughton, such as hybridization between farmed and native wild Atlantic salmon" p. 81

Okay, here's how sneaky and underhanded that comment is:

Ford's study (if you read it) broke-up the study areas into 11 separate areas world-wide; some with native Atlantic stocks, some without. Then then analyzed each area separately based on rivers exposed to and not exposed to open net-pen salmon farming.

Yes - so then you're right that between areas there are "additional impacts not relevant to the Broughton".

So friggen what !!! - they weren't even analyzed that way.</u> I'm sure they (PSF scientists) read the report too. So they already knew this - but they are hoping we don't.

AND if we have no native Atlantic salmon stocks here in the Pacific with which to hybridize with - isn't that 1 less risk that we can ignore, anyways. So why bring it up to begin with?

AND guess what - all the regions in the Ford peer-reviewed report show impacts from the effects of open net pens. The PSF authors conveniently forgot to add that 1 salient point.

Want another frustration? - they are only recommending that sea lice levels on the smallest pink and chums be looked at: "No more than 3% of juvenile wild pink and chum salmon of less than 0.5 grams should have more than one pre-adult or later stage L. salmonis between March 1 and May 31..." p.12

0.5 gram is a small smolt.

What about the larger sized smolts ?? - it is glaringly omitted here.

Yet, many authors, including those previously funded by the PSF, and those who have other peer-reviewed work out there (e.g. Krkosek et al., 1997) are unreported and used in this report - ones that have already worked on larger smolts and looked at their lice loads.

In the Krkosek et al. 2007 report, they looked at "21 448 juvenile pink salmon assayed for sea lice" and they grew to these sizes over the season "Over the season, the juvenile salmon increased in fork length from 30 mm in early spring up to 130 mm in summer. This corresponds to an increase in weight by two orders of magnitude from approximately 0.2 to 20 g.".

krkosek (2007) then reports and "low L. salmonis prevalence (2–3%) during the first two to three months of pink salmon marine life"

Then Krkosek goes on to explain: "population collapse was predicted to occur at a mean louse abundance of approximately 1.5 motile lice per fish."

So, the PSF already funded this study that told then what the numbers should be for larger smolts - but they IGNORE THE STUDY IN THIS REPORT!!!

LAP-PUPPY A*HOLES I say.

I could go-on - but you get the idea.
 
quote:Yet, many authors, including those previously funded by the PSF, and those who have other peer-reviewed work out there (e.g. Krkosek et al., 1997) are unreported and used in this report - ones that have already worked on larger smolts and looked at their lice loads.
Most certified marine biologists and scientists ignore Krkoseks study because it is so flawed in it's methodoly in sampling. Also it his research keeps getting discredited by anyone that takes a closer look work at his work. That being said I found the report did point at enviromental changes and habitat destruction as some of the main reasons for salmon population crashes. Of course that would not sit well with the farm bashers. Regardless something needs to be done asap to restore populations.
 
quote:Yet, many authors, including those previously funded by the PSF, and those who have other peer-reviewed work out there (e.g. Krkosek et al., 1997) are unreported and used in this report - ones that have already worked on larger smolts and looked at their lice loads.
Most certified marine biologists and scientists ignore Krkoseks study because it is so flawed in it's methodoly in sampling. Also it his research keeps getting discredited by anyone that takes a closer look work at his work. That being said I found the report did point at enviromental changes and habitat destruction as some of the main reasons for salmon population crashes. Of course that would not sit well with the farm bashers. Regardless something needs to be done asap to restore populations.
 
I want to see the twist put on by the pro fish farm guys on the BC Salmon Forum Final Report and Recommendations released yesterday. Should make for some very interesting spin doctoring.
 
I want to see the twist put on by the pro fish farm guys on the BC Salmon Forum Final Report and Recommendations released yesterday. Should make for some very interesting spin doctoring.
 
Report calls for salmon watchdog

New agency would monitor growing threats facing fish

By Larry Pynn, Canwest News ServiceFebruary 6, 2009

Wild salmon face unprecedented threats ranging from climate change to development and require the protection of a new agency dedicated to taking an ecological approach to all watershed activities that might threaten fish habitat, a report commissioned by the B.C. government recommended yesterday.

After four years of study, the B.C. Pacific Salmon Forum also concluded that farmed and wild salmon can co-exist, but recommended limits on salmon farming, including a cap on production in the Broughton Archipelago at current levels of 18,500 tonnes per year and managing farms to meet sea-lice limits on young wild salmon.

The forum also recommended a science secretariat to co-ordinate salmon research and urged the province to lead a pilot program to see if salmon farming can be economically viable using closed-containment systems.

Salmon farming in ocean net pens has been the subject of long-standing concerns related to transferring disease and lice to wild stocks, pollution, and the escape of non-native Atlantic salmon.

The forum recommended B.C. create a Water and Land Agency by 2012 to oversee the cumulative impact on salmon habitat of all resource activities, from traditional sectors such as logging and mining to modern threats such as run-of-the-river hydro projects.

Government progress would be subject to independent, open audits.

Forum chairman John Fraser, a former federal fisheries minister, said the practice of various government agencies considering developments in isolation has exacted a terrible toll on salmon stocks and cannot continue.

"Wild salmon are in serious trouble," he said. "We, as a province and society need to make significant changes if we want salmon to continue to have a future in B.C."

Ron Cantelon, newly appointed minister of agriculture and lands, with responsibility for aquaculture, said in response he is glad the report recognizes the right of wild and farmed salmon to co-exist.

As for creating a Water and Land Agency, he said his "bias is to get results, not necessarily on reorganizing everybody."

He would first like to see if that's possible through existing consultations, including with other levels of governments, first nations, industry, and stakeholder groups.

Clare Backman of Marine Harvest, representing about half of the B.C. salmon farm industry (80,000 tonnes in 2007), said the forum report confirms that wild salmon are affected by many factors and that aquaculture can be managed to protect wild stocks.

Alexandra Morton, the leading critic of salmon farms in the Broughton Archipelago, said she strongly endorses the forum's recommendation for local involvement in decision-making. "Most of the last viable fisheries around the world are those locally managed by the people who need the fish."

She opposes the suggested cap on salmon farming production, saying "the entire reason the forum was funded was because there are problems at the current levels."

The report's complete 16 recommendations can be viewed at www.pacificsalmonforum.ca.

lpynn@vancouversun.com

© Copyright (c) The Victoria Times Colonist
 
Report calls for salmon watchdog

New agency would monitor growing threats facing fish

By Larry Pynn, Canwest News ServiceFebruary 6, 2009

Wild salmon face unprecedented threats ranging from climate change to development and require the protection of a new agency dedicated to taking an ecological approach to all watershed activities that might threaten fish habitat, a report commissioned by the B.C. government recommended yesterday.

After four years of study, the B.C. Pacific Salmon Forum also concluded that farmed and wild salmon can co-exist, but recommended limits on salmon farming, including a cap on production in the Broughton Archipelago at current levels of 18,500 tonnes per year and managing farms to meet sea-lice limits on young wild salmon.

The forum also recommended a science secretariat to co-ordinate salmon research and urged the province to lead a pilot program to see if salmon farming can be economically viable using closed-containment systems.

Salmon farming in ocean net pens has been the subject of long-standing concerns related to transferring disease and lice to wild stocks, pollution, and the escape of non-native Atlantic salmon.

The forum recommended B.C. create a Water and Land Agency by 2012 to oversee the cumulative impact on salmon habitat of all resource activities, from traditional sectors such as logging and mining to modern threats such as run-of-the-river hydro projects.

Government progress would be subject to independent, open audits.

Forum chairman John Fraser, a former federal fisheries minister, said the practice of various government agencies considering developments in isolation has exacted a terrible toll on salmon stocks and cannot continue.

"Wild salmon are in serious trouble," he said. "We, as a province and society need to make significant changes if we want salmon to continue to have a future in B.C."

Ron Cantelon, newly appointed minister of agriculture and lands, with responsibility for aquaculture, said in response he is glad the report recognizes the right of wild and farmed salmon to co-exist.

As for creating a Water and Land Agency, he said his "bias is to get results, not necessarily on reorganizing everybody."

He would first like to see if that's possible through existing consultations, including with other levels of governments, first nations, industry, and stakeholder groups.

Clare Backman of Marine Harvest, representing about half of the B.C. salmon farm industry (80,000 tonnes in 2007), said the forum report confirms that wild salmon are affected by many factors and that aquaculture can be managed to protect wild stocks.

Alexandra Morton, the leading critic of salmon farms in the Broughton Archipelago, said she strongly endorses the forum's recommendation for local involvement in decision-making. "Most of the last viable fisheries around the world are those locally managed by the people who need the fish."

She opposes the suggested cap on salmon farming production, saying "the entire reason the forum was funded was because there are problems at the current levels."

The report's complete 16 recommendations can be viewed at www.pacificsalmonforum.ca.

lpynn@vancouversun.com

© Copyright (c) The Victoria Times Colonist
 
quote:Originally posted by rln

I want to see the twist put on by the pro fish farm guys on the BC Salmon Forum Final Report and Recommendations released yesterday. Should make for some very interesting spin doctoring.
You don't have to go too far, rin. Just look at storybenders comments:"Most certified marine biologists and scientists ignore Krkoseks study because it is so flawed in it's methodoly in sampling. Also it his research keeps getting discredited by anyone that takes a closer look work at his work. "

Just look at how he describes what his interpretations are of Krkoseks work: "MOST" "certified</u>"

Firstly - to make that claim in with any pretext of science - there would of had to been a public survey targeted at "certified" marine biologists. I am unaware of any such survey - and I bet wordbender has no data on this either.

Secondly, Krkoseks work (unlike Barbender's myopic and uneducated opinion) is PEER-REVIEWED ALREADY. It has been judged to be legitimate by the world's scientific community.

That mean that this work was already "certified".

The only other definition for "certified" that I can think of is one of mental stability - where one is "certified" insane, or with another serious mental health disease.

So from that definition, or perspective I agree with Barbender that someone who constantly denies Krkoseks and others work because they personally don't like the message - are indeed "CERTIFIED" with a mental health issue like being a sociopath. We already discussed this at length earlier on this forum.

Besides Barbender; I anticipate the usual suspects: Robert Wager, Patrick Moore, Odd Gryland, Ian Roberts, and Mary-Ellen Walling to similarly demonstrate their sociopathic tendencies about this report and krkosek's work.

Shoot the messenger - and hope everyone gets the message - so that nobody wants to send any more messages. That's their ineffective sociopathic modus operandi.
 
quote:Originally posted by rln

I want to see the twist put on by the pro fish farm guys on the BC Salmon Forum Final Report and Recommendations released yesterday. Should make for some very interesting spin doctoring.
You don't have to go too far, rin. Just look at storybenders comments:"Most certified marine biologists and scientists ignore Krkoseks study because it is so flawed in it's methodoly in sampling. Also it his research keeps getting discredited by anyone that takes a closer look work at his work. "

Just look at how he describes what his interpretations are of Krkoseks work: "MOST" "certified</u>"

Firstly - to make that claim in with any pretext of science - there would of had to been a public survey targeted at "certified" marine biologists. I am unaware of any such survey - and I bet wordbender has no data on this either.

Secondly, Krkoseks work (unlike Barbender's myopic and uneducated opinion) is PEER-REVIEWED ALREADY. It has been judged to be legitimate by the world's scientific community.

That mean that this work was already "certified".

The only other definition for "certified" that I can think of is one of mental stability - where one is "certified" insane, or with another serious mental health disease.

So from that definition, or perspective I agree with Barbender that someone who constantly denies Krkoseks and others work because they personally don't like the message - are indeed "CERTIFIED" with a mental health issue like being a sociopath. We already discussed this at length earlier on this forum.

Besides Barbender; I anticipate the usual suspects: Robert Wager, Patrick Moore, Odd Gryland, Ian Roberts, and Mary-Ellen Walling to similarly demonstrate their sociopathic tendencies about this report and krkosek's work.

Shoot the messenger - and hope everyone gets the message - so that nobody wants to send any more messages. That's their ineffective sociopathic modus operandi.
 
Campbell appoints old boy rear-guard to deny, deflect and stall the process for modernization to closed containment by the fish farm industry, as recommended by the PSF Report...

right after the release of the PSF - THIS!!

The Daily News, 6th February 2009

New B.C. minister can support salmon industry


Re: 'MLA gets cabinet posting' (Daily News, Feb. 3)

Congratulations to Ron Cantelon for his appointment as Minister of Agriculture and Lands.

During his swearing in, Premier Gordon Campbell highlighted Cantelon's passion for the salmon aquaculture industry.

We expect that this passion extends to the future of wild salmon and that Cantelon is fully aware of their importance to the entire province. Now that he is in this position, we trusthe will respond to the concerns of the majority of British Columbians, as well as his own constituents, by supporting the finance committee's recommendation to fund closed containment projects in the 2009 budget.

This of course was also a recommendation of the special committee on sustainable aquaculture, of which Cantelon was the vice-chairman.

By supporting this recommendation, Cantelon will be furthering the development of a remedy that assures the vibrant future of both wild and farmed salmon in B.C.

Ruby Berry

Georgia Strait Alliance

Nanaimo
© Copyright (c) Canwest News Service

http://www.canada.com/minister+support+salmon+industry/1260391/story.html

"Judging from the comments from the province's new agriculture minister, Ron Cantelon, there may be some resistance from both the industry and government to experiment with closed containment farming.

He said there is currently no pilot projects of closed containment fish farming existing anywhere in the world.

"If it was easy, someone would have done it by now," he told me Thursday.
"
Robert Barron, The Daily News
Published: Friday, February 06,2009


So I think it's unwarranted and unrealistic. For that reason, I'll be voting against supporting this report.
REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS
(Hansard)
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON
SUSTAINABLE AQUACULTURE
WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 2007


"A Liberal member of the committee, Ron Cantelon, who represents the riding of Nanaimo-Parkville, dismissed that as a "fairy tale."

He said if the report were implemented, it would mean the end of the salmon farming industry in B.C
."

B.C. urged to ban open-net fish farms within 5 years
Last Updated: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 | 5:17 PM PT
CBC News
 
Campbell appoints old boy rear-guard to deny, deflect and stall the process for modernization to closed containment by the fish farm industry, as recommended by the PSF Report...

right after the release of the PSF - THIS!!

The Daily News, 6th February 2009

New B.C. minister can support salmon industry


Re: 'MLA gets cabinet posting' (Daily News, Feb. 3)

Congratulations to Ron Cantelon for his appointment as Minister of Agriculture and Lands.

During his swearing in, Premier Gordon Campbell highlighted Cantelon's passion for the salmon aquaculture industry.

We expect that this passion extends to the future of wild salmon and that Cantelon is fully aware of their importance to the entire province. Now that he is in this position, we trusthe will respond to the concerns of the majority of British Columbians, as well as his own constituents, by supporting the finance committee's recommendation to fund closed containment projects in the 2009 budget.

This of course was also a recommendation of the special committee on sustainable aquaculture, of which Cantelon was the vice-chairman.

By supporting this recommendation, Cantelon will be furthering the development of a remedy that assures the vibrant future of both wild and farmed salmon in B.C.

Ruby Berry

Georgia Strait Alliance

Nanaimo
© Copyright (c) Canwest News Service

http://www.canada.com/minister+support+salmon+industry/1260391/story.html

"Judging from the comments from the province's new agriculture minister, Ron Cantelon, there may be some resistance from both the industry and government to experiment with closed containment farming.

He said there is currently no pilot projects of closed containment fish farming existing anywhere in the world.

"If it was easy, someone would have done it by now," he told me Thursday.
"
Robert Barron, The Daily News
Published: Friday, February 06,2009


So I think it's unwarranted and unrealistic. For that reason, I'll be voting against supporting this report.
REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS
(Hansard)
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON
SUSTAINABLE AQUACULTURE
WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 2007


"A Liberal member of the committee, Ron Cantelon, who represents the riding of Nanaimo-Parkville, dismissed that as a "fairy tale."

He said if the report were implemented, it would mean the end of the salmon farming industry in B.C
."

B.C. urged to ban open-net fish farms within 5 years
Last Updated: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 | 5:17 PM PT
CBC News
 
Back
Top