Canada 'caught in middle' over salmon cull

Sushihunter

Active Member
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=490331

Canada 'caught in middle' over salmon cull
West coast states ban fishing for chinook


Zosia Bielski, National Post
Published: Saturday, May 03, 2008


Canada will not be bullied by the United States into limiting its cull of threatened chinook salmon this year, despite a ban on all fishing of the species off the west coasts of California and Oregon, according to Gerry Kristianson, of Canada's Pacific Salmon Commission.

On Thursday, the U.S. National Marine Fishery Service announced the closure of commercial and recreational fishing for chinook salmon off the west coast, the first such ban in 160 years.

In Vancouver next week, officials from the U.S. and Canada will discuss the lucrative chinook culls, the final and most contentious piece of reforging the Pacific Salmon Treaty, a 10-year agreement that divides up harvests between the two countries. The present treaty expires at the end of the year.

Mr. Kristianson said Canada had offered to reduce its harvest, if the U.S. limits its own in Alaska.

"Canada's caught in the middle because we're under tremendous pressure from Washington, Oregon and, to some extent, California to reduce our interception of their fish, but there has to be a reduction north of us, otherwise, we become the ever thinner slice of meat in the sandwich between two parts of the United States," he said.

Mr. Kristianson said the greatest resistance is coming from Alaska, "who of course are used to being able to get the lion's share of the fish and who don't want to give that up.

"Canada's interests do not lie in fishing down weak stocks of American fish because if those stocks are strong, we get to harvest some of them. Similarly, we're not going to be the Boy Scouts of the planet."

Five species of salmon live in the Pacific Ocean: chinook, sockeye, coho, pink and chum. The largest and most valuable is the chinook salmon, otherwise known as the king salmon. Sports fishermen prize it for its size: the fish can grow up to 11 kilograms.

Salmon scientists and fisheries managers are particularly concerned about declines in California, the biggest spawning losses appearing in the Sacramento River and its tributaries.

Jeff Grout, regional resource manager of salmon for Fisheries and Oceans Canada, attributes the declines to changes in climate.

"What we've seen is a weakness of fish that went to the ocean in 2005. Our salmon like cold water and the zooplankton and other food species that are in that cold water. In 2005, we had very warm water that our juvenile salmon were going out into and it appears there wasn't a lot of food available for them to eat."

He says the government is working to preserve more vulnerable chinook from over harvesting.

"We're putting together fishing plans to ensure sufficient numbers of fish reach our spawning grounds in 2008 and to sustain the species in coming years."

Those measures include reduced harvests at some key fisheries and limits on recreational culls, particularly for the early time Fraser River chinook that spawn as early as March.

Chinook salmon are anadromous: they hatch in rivers, migrate to the ocean and return to their native streams to lay eggs (or spawn), usually between May and January, before dying.

zbielski@nationalpost.com
 
Think this had any impact? How long has this been going-on for? Why is nobody talking about this?

Bering Sea pollock fishery accidentally takes 130,000 prize chinook;</u> [Final Edition]
Terri Theodore. Whitehorse Star. Whitehorse, Y.T.: Feb 27, 2008. pg. 21
Copyright 2008 Whitehorse Star. All rights reserved.)

American fishing boats with massive nets dredging the bottom of the Bering Sea for pollock accidentally caught 130,000 thousand prized chinook salmon last year. About half of those salmon would have ended up in Canadian rivers. It came in the same year that fish escapement levels were hardly reached in the Yukon River, well known for its chinook fishery. Canadian commercial fishermen weren't allowed to take any chinook from the river and First Nations pulled just 5,000 fish for a food fishery. The record accidental catch, or bycatch, has alarmed fisheries experts, environmentalists, government officials and even pollock trawlers, who say a bycatch cap would devastate their fishery. DNA analysis shows about 20 per cent of the chinook caught up in the football field-sized nets were bound for the Yukon River, which runs through both Alaska and Yukon Territory. Another 40 per cent of those salmon were destined for rivers in British Columbia and the U.S. Pacific Northwest. The U.S. North Pacific Fisheries Management Council is looking over several options to prevent such a massive bycatch again, but it will be two years before new rules are implemented. "And in the meantime nobody's watching the fish," Gerry Couture said in frustration. Couture, a Canadian member of the Yukon Salmon Committee in the Yukon River Panel, said the process the save chinook is moving with glacial speed. Chinook, also know as king, are the giants of the salmon world and can reach weights equal to an average seven-year- old child. They are the fish you often see in pictures where a beaming sport fisherman is using both hands to hold up his catch, after fighting to get the fish in the boat. Pollock are small, sedate and plentiful, and often used in fish sticks or fast-food fish sandwiches. The billion-dollar Bering Sea pollock fishery is the largest in the world. The bycatch issue has been a problem for years but never have so many chinook been caught up in the nets as in 2007. Jon Warrenchuk, a marine scientists with the American marine advocacy group Oceana, said the failure to cut the bycatch is a failure in regulation. "Salmon is so important to many people up and down the Pacific Coast," he said from his office in Juneau, Alaska. "It's boggling to me that there's no ceiling limit." And while some First Nations aren't even allowed to catch their full chinook quota for sustenance, pollock fishermen are either throwing away the bycatch or donating the fish to food banks because they aren't allowed to sell it. About 90 per cent of the 130,000 chinook bycatch was picked up by trawlers, while the remainder was captured by all other fisheries in the Bering Sea. "I know the numbers look very bad," admitted Stephanie Madsen, executive director of At Sea Processors Association, which represents seven pollock-processing companies. She said the industry agrees the bycatch in 2007 was unacceptable but they're not sure how to avoid the salmon, which seem to be following the pollock or vice versa. Madsen said rolling closures haven't worked because they close one spot where the bycatch is high, only to find a high bycatch in the next place they throw their nets. "We're struggling right now to figure out how to stay out of their way," she said. Each of the four options going to the fishery management council are complicated, but break down into a hard-cap closure that would stop the fishery once a certain number of chinook are caught, a trigger cap that would set off a time-area closure, fixed closures that stop the fishery at a certain time or keep the status quo.

Credit: The Canadian Press
 
It is bad agentaqua, but that probably did not have an impact as none of the fish were destined to return to the Sacremento.
 
quote:Originally posted by drad2k4

It is bad agentaqua, but that probably did not have an impact as none of the fish were destined to return to the Sacremento.
"Another 40 per cent of those salmon were destined for rivers in British Columbia and the U.S. Pacific Northwest"....
 
Shhhh, you don't want to advertise they grow bigger;)
quote:Originally posted by Concerned Angler

Whats with this "CULL" crap???? NOBODY "culls" salmon. They are harvested ( or poached)

And whats this???
quote:The largest and most valuable is the chinook salmon, otherwise known as the king salmon. Sports fishermen prize it for its size: the fish can grow up to 11 kilograms.

Will some one send this dumb-butt reporter back to journalism school where they teach wanna- be Lois Lanes to CHECK thier facts.
 
Lets not forget that Alaska recently pulled, I believe, one of the fourth largest chinook hauls. Ted Stevens is keeping the Alaskan fishery alive and not having to agree with any other user groups. Wish he would hurry up and go to prison so we can fish our fishery. He is as crooked as the day is long and controls congress money distribution for the US. He is supposedly getting endictated for letting huge companies built his house for favors and got caught.

Also in 2003 in Klamath Falls they refused to let the water spill to save the salmon and killed a huge portion of those 5 year old fish runs. This is now turning up and they should not be surprised.
 
Lets not forget that Alaska recently pulled, I believe, one of the fourth largest chinook hauls. Ted Stevens is keeping the Alaskan fishery alive and not having to agree with any other user groups. Wish he would hurry up and go to prison so we can fish our fishery. He is as crooked as the day is long and controls congress money distribution for the US. He is supposedly getting endictated for letting huge companies built his house for favors and got caught.

Also in 2003 in Klamath Falls they refused to let the water spill to save the salmon and killed a huge portion of those 5 year old fish runs. This is now turning up and they should not be surprised.
 
Do you think any US or Canadian bound chinooks were caught in these nets? How many of these poachers are still out there?

http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/media/newsrel/2008/hq-ac10_e.htm

Vessels Confiscated and Licences Cancelled for Illegal High Seas Driftnet Use in North Pacific Ocean

February 22, 2008


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VANCOUVER – The Honourable Loyola Hearn, Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, today said that action has been taken against six Chinese fishing vessels that were sighted using illegal high seas driftnets in the North Pacific Ocean during Canada’s Operation Driftnet aerial patrols last September.

"Operation Driftnet patrols play a key role in shutting down destructive illegal fishing activities on the high seas in the North Pacific," said Minister Hearn. "Canadians can be proud of our contribution to this important multinational effort."
 
Do you think any US or Canadian bound chinooks were caught in these nets? How many of these poachers are still out there?

http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/media/newsrel/2008/hq-ac10_e.htm

Vessels Confiscated and Licences Cancelled for Illegal High Seas Driftnet Use in North Pacific Ocean

February 22, 2008


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VANCOUVER – The Honourable Loyola Hearn, Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, today said that action has been taken against six Chinese fishing vessels that were sighted using illegal high seas driftnets in the North Pacific Ocean during Canada’s Operation Driftnet aerial patrols last September.

"Operation Driftnet patrols play a key role in shutting down destructive illegal fishing activities on the high seas in the North Pacific," said Minister Hearn. "Canadians can be proud of our contribution to this important multinational effort."
 
Back
Top