Haverodwilltravel
Active Member
It settled then. Increasing the herring quota in SOG would be safe and effectiveMaybe take some time to read the Herring IFMP to actually understand herring and what they are actually doing...

It settled then. Increasing the herring quota in SOG would be safe and effectiveMaybe take some time to read the Herring IFMP to actually understand herring and what they are actually doing...
Let us know how your protest went.Me neither. Maybe we should do a protest?
It didn’t go well at all. As a matter of factLet us know how your protest went.
Yep100 percent on that... some of the best spawning in years ...
Of course. But in my recollection of about 30+ years there has always been an abundance of spawn in Qualicum each and every March. Its not necessary for me to read a report by Scientists hired to report the DFO “safe and effective” narrative.There is lots of spawns this year, very good in fact. Herring don't always spawn in the exact same areas every year. You need to look at the SOG as a whole not just one beach. Take a look at the DFO numbers.
Far too much of that these days. Believing in something has replaced facts. Just look at the resurgance of measles across North America for example. Shameful!!!beleive what you want.
I don't think he was going to listen to any facts .... I was getting tired telling him it's not doom and gloom. .....Far too much of that these days. Believing in something has replaced facts. Just look at the resurgance of measles across North America for example. Shameful!!!
Yes, 3 years in a row the biomass was above the threshold to allow a sustainable fishery, but decisions made not to proceed (except for spawn on kelp fishery) to ensure the recovery was a full trend and successful.Confirmed herring biomass in Barkley Sound at 20,000T verses last few years of 8,000.
Noticeable improvement.
Just for the record…..commercial herring harvest is quite a bit more multi-faceted then “roe to Japan”….
Every year I sell commercially caught herring to Pacific cod longline vessels in the Bering Sea, Dungeness crab guys in Rupert and the Salish Sea, and to halibut sport charter guys in Southeast Alaska.
And then there’s the tray-pack that supports the salmon sport fishery we all rely on
If it’s a well -managed harvest (14% TAC sounds to be on the conservative side if the population dynamics and biomass estimates are accurate ) then it should be supportable as a sound use of a renewable resource
DFO doesn’t always get it right but in this case it appears they are properly managing the herring stocks while supporting the commercial sector
For many years the derby style herring fishery rewarded cheating and over-fishing. Since DFO switched to the individual quota system there is zero benefit to catching more than your quota so over-fishing and cheating has essentially stopped. DFO then adopted the same model as the highly successful herring fishery in California. This model was based on harvesting up to 20% of the biomass and leaving 80% to spawn. This has resulted in a stable, predictable fishery in spite of the "hair on fire" rhetoric often times espoused on here. Reducing the harvest rate to 14%, while unnecessary, will result in even larger herring runs in the future. The "hair on fire gang" will not be happy until the harvest rate is zero.Just for the record…..commercial herring harvest is quite a bit more multi-faceted then “roe to Japan”….
Every year I sell commercially caught herring to Pacific cod longline vessels in the Bering Sea, Dungeness crab guys in Rupert and the Salish Sea, and to halibut sport charter guys in Southeast Alaska.
And then there’s the tray-pack that supports the salmon sport fishery we all rely on
If it’s a well -managed harvest (14% TAC sounds to be on the conservative side if the population dynamics and biomass estimates are accurate ) then it should be supportable as a sound use of a renewable resource
DFO doesn’t always get it right but in this case it appears they are properly managing the herring stocks while supporting the commercial sector