CR, Many of us here on either side of the discussion have discussed your questions and posted studies extensively years before you joined in. This factor and your approach to the discussion which is somewhat childish, i.e. your taunting title of this thread make having the discussion with you some what moot.
I get your position. You appose salmon farms on many levels and thats that. There is not much discussion to be had with that mentality specifically when your satisfied with the tactics and shenanigans morton display in her career as an activist.
Just because you are not receiving a response to your "demands" on this forum does not mean there isn't a response. But by all means feel free to draw your conclusions from that if thats all you require as "proof".
I too have backed away from these pissing matches because they have a few new joiners who seem to just be repeating over and over the same old scare tactics and info that is OLD news to the rest of us. This is also a tactic of activists is to repeat repeat repeat in the hopes that those who see it repeatedly will eventually believe it. Thats fine but I'm not sure its attracting the general publics attention as it is meant too in fact I think its backfiring. For example this study from 2007 predicted the extinction of pink salmon within 4 years.
https://www.sfu.ca/cstudies/science/resources/1320967257.pdf How did that peer reviewed scientific paper turn out? Not so well. Pink populations exploded years after that.
Anyway, I think if you want feed back from your posts you have to change your tone otherwise your on your own.
As for being called stupid, and uneducated or what ever else you claim to have encountered here, I think I've been licensed to say this LOL having endured extensive abuse here, quit being such a whiny baby and just have a discussion where you stick to the topic. Try discussing the topic in a manner that is open and inviting instead of how you are going about in this thread.
