If you're going offshore . Twins. If your staying inside , with help nearby. A single with a kicker....Conundrum for me :
24 ft aluminum Alaskan bulkhead
Use 2 115 or one 225
ThanksIf you're going offshore . Twins. If your staying inside , with help nearby. A single with a kicker....
I'm guessing $40 k for the twins and about $35k for single and kicker.Out of curiosity what would the price difference be between the twin 115's vs a 225 plus kicker?
About 4K more 225 plus kickerI'm guessing $40 k for the twins and about $35k for single and kicker.
Not many dealers price their products on line
24 ft 8.6 beam Cabin / cuddy 80 gal gasNot enough information for us to really offer you a good answer. Good start might be the boat manufacturer and model or dimensions. A 24 aluminum can range in weight by 2000lbs depending on manufacturer.. some boats like weight aft, some do not.
Went through a similar conundrum a couple years ago, opted for twin Suzuki 140’s and couldn’t be happier with the decision. The up front cost was not much different, the maintenance cost has been similar to previous boats with a main and kicker and the fuel burn is still very economical. The other benefits of running offshore on twins and trolling in swells and wind are very nice.Conundrum for me :
24 ft aluminum Alaskan bulkhead
Use 2 115 or one 225
What would be the most efficientWhat is your conundrum?
For me, my economy is slightly better with twins. Old boat with single 250 was approximately 1200 lbs lighter too.What would be the most efficient
Thank youFor me, my economy is slightly better with twins. Old boat with single 250 was approximately 1200 lbs lighter too.
I faced this exact decision and went with twins. Economy is still good, handling around the dock is far superior with twins, trolling is more enjoyable with one of the mains, especially in wind and/or chop. Charging amps are far superior on the big engine over a kicker. If one dies you can make good headway with the other (mine can do 26 mph on plane on one engine).
Literally the only downside for me is that with mechanical control engines it's not practical to have rear helm controls for the mains, whereas with the kicker you likely have the controls at the rear helm.
I've had both setups on similar boats. Old boat had single 250/kicker, new boat has twin 115.
Thank youOne problem that might change your scope is fuel tank output. Need independent dip tubes for each engine. Rhat is if you want it to be transport canada approved and surveyable.