Trudeau promises more gun control and goes on the attack against Scheer

RCMP faces $98M cut as Liberals push ahead with expensive gun grab​

The Liberal government is barrelling ahead with a multi-billion-dollar firearms confiscation program that critics argue will be ineffective in fighting crime while slashing the RCMP’s budget by $98m.​


Tracy Wilson, with the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights (CCFR), called the contrast “stunning.”

“The Liberals slash RCMP budget while at the same time pushing forward with spending billions on a gun grab exclusively against licensed owners and their legally acquired firearms,” Wilson said.

An internal email from RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme confirmed the force must find two per cent in savings as part of the federal government’s broader spending reduction plan.


The cuts, which will affect current activities and programs, are expected to be developed in the coming weeks and presented in the 2026-27 estimates.

The decision comes as Ottawa doubles down on its so-called ‘firearms buyback’ program, first launched in 2020 through a Cabinet order. Over 5 years since the Liberal’s first ban announcement, the firearms in question remain with their licensed owners, although they are unable to be legally used.

The initiative, which bans more than 2,500 models of previously legal firearms, has been repeatedly delayed and is now scheduled to conclude by the end of 2026. Costs are expected to reach nearly $2 billion.

Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree reaffirmed recently that the forced confiscation program remains a priority for Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government, telling the Toronto Star that enforcement would not be voluntary and owners would receive compensation.

The program has drawn sharp criticism from police on the ground.

Toronto Police Association President Clayton Campbell said the government seizure plan is “a waste of resources,” pointing out that nearly 90 per cent of guns seized in the city originate from the United States, with legal firearms almost never used in crimes.

“I can’t think of a time when a legal gun has been used in a crime in this city, not one,” Campbell said, adding that law enforcement resources would be better spent tackling violent repeat offenders and border smuggling.

He warned the confiscation plan could strain policing capacity if officers were tasked with locating firearms across the country.

“It would be tough. A lot of the time these are unrestricted firearms so we don’t know where they are. It’s really just a waste of resources,” Campbell said.

Despite criticism, Anandasangaree said the government remains committed, arguing the program was a campaign promise Canadians expect to see delivered.

Meanwhile, RCMP members are waiting to learn which programs or services may be restructured or eliminated as part of the $98-million savings plan.

Duheme assured staff that "all decisions will prioritize the health and safety of our members on the frontline and the communities we serve."

 

Smith rejects Carney’s “voluntary” gun ban, says Alberta won’t enforce​

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith responded to Prime Minister Mark Carney’s claim that the Liberal gun confiscation program was “voluntary”, saying that it doesn’t matter either way, as the law will not be enforced in the province.​


The response came when talking with Ryan Jespersen on Friday morning.

“The federal government has jurisdiction over the Criminal Code, but the provinces have the power over policing and administration of justice. And that means we get to decide our policing priorities,” said Smith. “Our policing priorities are not to be targeting those who purchase their guns legally.”

She explained that non-enforcement of federal laws has been common in the past, seen nationwide with cannabis laws before it was legalized, British Columbia’s non-enforcement of hard drugs, and more.

“This is the power the provinces have,” said Smith. “There’s no appetite in my government to assist in targeting legal gun owners.”


Smith is doubling down after she previously vowed to use every power available to her provincial government to fight the Liberals’ gun confiscation scheme.

Her comments followed Carney, while speaking on the same podcast, calling the Liberals’ gun confiscation program “voluntary” for the first time since the program was introduced in 2020.

Adding to the confusion, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree doubled down on the “voluntary” comments in an exclusive interview with True North.

Smith explained that the focus of law enforcement can be better spent elsewhere.

“People want their law enforcement to focus on bad guys, and we’ve got a lot of bad guys out there,” she said. “We’ve got organized crime, fentanyl labs. We’ve got gangs. We’ve got human traffickers. We don’t want police resources going and knocking on people’s doors, because they didn’t voluntarily decide to give up their guns for payment, as the Prime Minister puts it.”

The misleadingly branded ‘buy back’ has historically been presented to Canadians as mandatory. The program, introduced via Cabinet decree in 2020, eventually banned over 2,500 models of firearms, with costs expected to reach nearly $2 billion. However, the federal government has continuously extended the amnesty period as it has struggled to implement the program.

To date, after five years, the banned guns remain in the possession of their licensed owners who legally purchased the firearms.

CEO of the Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights, Rod Giltaca, told True North after Carney’s comments that he doubts Ottawa has shifted to a voluntary approach.

“I think it’s more likely Carney has no idea what this program is in the first place, nor what the program is capable or incapable of achieving,” he said. “I don’t believe it will be optional. Maybe they’ll say ‘Keep your firearms, don’t get paid for them, but you’ll have to deactivate them (weld them shut)’ and therefore make them useless. Not really ‘optional.’”

Carney also claimed the ban does not affect hunting rifles or sporting firearms, and said the ban focuses only on assault rifles.

Giltaca said this characterization was false.

“There were no ‘assault weapons’ banned since May 1, 2020. Every one of these firearms were for hunting and or sport shooting. That’s why they were legal in the first place,” said Giltaca. “The lies of these people are outrageous.”

The penalty for illegal possession of a prohibited firearm is up to five years in jail.

The Vice President of Public Relations for the CCFR, Tracey Wilson, previously told True North that the program was not as the Liberals are now presenting it.

“So it’s not a ‘voluntary’ program, or ‘buy back’ as the Liberals and some in the media have happily called it. It is confiscation and seizure, under threat of imprisonment,” she said. “Carney has the gall to call it an ‘opportunity’ for licensed, law-abiding firearms owners to turn in their legally-purchased property?”

True North has asked Public Safety Canada what the consequences for noncompliance of the “voluntary” program will be for Canadians, but has not received a reply.

 
Back
Top