Trudeau promises more gun control and goes on the attack against Scheer

RCMP faces $98M cut as Liberals push ahead with expensive gun grab​

The Liberal government is barrelling ahead with a multi-billion-dollar firearms confiscation program that critics argue will be ineffective in fighting crime while slashing the RCMP’s budget by $98m.​


Tracy Wilson, with the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights (CCFR), called the contrast “stunning.”

“The Liberals slash RCMP budget while at the same time pushing forward with spending billions on a gun grab exclusively against licensed owners and their legally acquired firearms,” Wilson said.

An internal email from RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme confirmed the force must find two per cent in savings as part of the federal government’s broader spending reduction plan.


The cuts, which will affect current activities and programs, are expected to be developed in the coming weeks and presented in the 2026-27 estimates.

The decision comes as Ottawa doubles down on its so-called ‘firearms buyback’ program, first launched in 2020 through a Cabinet order. Over 5 years since the Liberal’s first ban announcement, the firearms in question remain with their licensed owners, although they are unable to be legally used.

The initiative, which bans more than 2,500 models of previously legal firearms, has been repeatedly delayed and is now scheduled to conclude by the end of 2026. Costs are expected to reach nearly $2 billion.

Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree reaffirmed recently that the forced confiscation program remains a priority for Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government, telling the Toronto Star that enforcement would not be voluntary and owners would receive compensation.

The program has drawn sharp criticism from police on the ground.

Toronto Police Association President Clayton Campbell said the government seizure plan is “a waste of resources,” pointing out that nearly 90 per cent of guns seized in the city originate from the United States, with legal firearms almost never used in crimes.

“I can’t think of a time when a legal gun has been used in a crime in this city, not one,” Campbell said, adding that law enforcement resources would be better spent tackling violent repeat offenders and border smuggling.

He warned the confiscation plan could strain policing capacity if officers were tasked with locating firearms across the country.

“It would be tough. A lot of the time these are unrestricted firearms so we don’t know where they are. It’s really just a waste of resources,” Campbell said.

Despite criticism, Anandasangaree said the government remains committed, arguing the program was a campaign promise Canadians expect to see delivered.

Meanwhile, RCMP members are waiting to learn which programs or services may be restructured or eliminated as part of the $98-million savings plan.

Duheme assured staff that "all decisions will prioritize the health and safety of our members on the frontline and the communities we serve."

 

Smith rejects Carney’s “voluntary” gun ban, says Alberta won’t enforce​

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith responded to Prime Minister Mark Carney’s claim that the Liberal gun confiscation program was “voluntary”, saying that it doesn’t matter either way, as the law will not be enforced in the province.​


The response came when talking with Ryan Jespersen on Friday morning.

“The federal government has jurisdiction over the Criminal Code, but the provinces have the power over policing and administration of justice. And that means we get to decide our policing priorities,” said Smith. “Our policing priorities are not to be targeting those who purchase their guns legally.”

She explained that non-enforcement of federal laws has been common in the past, seen nationwide with cannabis laws before it was legalized, British Columbia’s non-enforcement of hard drugs, and more.

“This is the power the provinces have,” said Smith. “There’s no appetite in my government to assist in targeting legal gun owners.”


Smith is doubling down after she previously vowed to use every power available to her provincial government to fight the Liberals’ gun confiscation scheme.

Her comments followed Carney, while speaking on the same podcast, calling the Liberals’ gun confiscation program “voluntary” for the first time since the program was introduced in 2020.

Adding to the confusion, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree doubled down on the “voluntary” comments in an exclusive interview with True North.

Smith explained that the focus of law enforcement can be better spent elsewhere.

“People want their law enforcement to focus on bad guys, and we’ve got a lot of bad guys out there,” she said. “We’ve got organized crime, fentanyl labs. We’ve got gangs. We’ve got human traffickers. We don’t want police resources going and knocking on people’s doors, because they didn’t voluntarily decide to give up their guns for payment, as the Prime Minister puts it.”

The misleadingly branded ‘buy back’ has historically been presented to Canadians as mandatory. The program, introduced via Cabinet decree in 2020, eventually banned over 2,500 models of firearms, with costs expected to reach nearly $2 billion. However, the federal government has continuously extended the amnesty period as it has struggled to implement the program.

To date, after five years, the banned guns remain in the possession of their licensed owners who legally purchased the firearms.

CEO of the Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights, Rod Giltaca, told True North after Carney’s comments that he doubts Ottawa has shifted to a voluntary approach.

“I think it’s more likely Carney has no idea what this program is in the first place, nor what the program is capable or incapable of achieving,” he said. “I don’t believe it will be optional. Maybe they’ll say ‘Keep your firearms, don’t get paid for them, but you’ll have to deactivate them (weld them shut)’ and therefore make them useless. Not really ‘optional.’”

Carney also claimed the ban does not affect hunting rifles or sporting firearms, and said the ban focuses only on assault rifles.

Giltaca said this characterization was false.

“There were no ‘assault weapons’ banned since May 1, 2020. Every one of these firearms were for hunting and or sport shooting. That’s why they were legal in the first place,” said Giltaca. “The lies of these people are outrageous.”

The penalty for illegal possession of a prohibited firearm is up to five years in jail.

The Vice President of Public Relations for the CCFR, Tracey Wilson, previously told True North that the program was not as the Liberals are now presenting it.

“So it’s not a ‘voluntary’ program, or ‘buy back’ as the Liberals and some in the media have happily called it. It is confiscation and seizure, under threat of imprisonment,” she said. “Carney has the gall to call it an ‘opportunity’ for licensed, law-abiding firearms owners to turn in their legally-purchased property?”

True North has asked Public Safety Canada what the consequences for noncompliance of the “voluntary” program will be for Canadians, but has not received a reply.

 
From the Canadian Taxpayer Association:

Someone get Carney a dictionary: He doesn’t know what “voluntary” means


Prime Minister Mark Carney thinks the government confiscating your property is “voluntary.”

Are you kidding us!?

Here’s the skinny on the government’s gun ban and confiscation scheme:

The Trudeau Liberals announced they would ban certain guns in 2019, then take those guns from law-abiding Canadian citizens and force taxpayers like you to compensate those law-abiding Canadians after the government steals their property.

Here’s what Carney said this week about the confiscation scheme:

“This is not about confiscation. This is about voluntary return of firearms for compensation of these firearms ... We’re not confiscating guns. People aren't going around confiscating guns. Anyone who says that, that is a mischaracterization. What it is is an opportunity for Canadians to return guns for compensation.”

The federal public safety minister followed up on Carney’s remarks by claiming this confiscation scheme has “always been voluntary.”

Apparently, Carney doesn’t know what voluntary means.

He acts like he wants to give you a cheque in exchange for your compliance — oops, we mean gun.

But what he’s really doing is adding guns to a curated list of banned firearms crafted by Ottawa bureaucrats and offering consolation prizes. With your own money.

As a bitter, rotten, cherry on top, if people don’t obey his orders and hand over the gun legally used for sport shooting, the government can toss you in jail.

The penalty for illegal possession of a prohibited firearm under the Criminal Code is up to five years.

At minimum, the Carney government owes you clarification.

Are firearms owners who don't hand over their firearms going to be able to keep them but not sell or transfer them? Will Canadians still be able to use the firearms they don’t turn over to the government?

And remember: this confiscation has all the makings of a huge taxpayer boondoggle that won’t make Canada safe.

When the Liberals first announced this scheme, they estimated the cost to taxpayers would be about $200 million. Internal government documents now show the price tag will likely be closer to $2 billion.

And even that is likely low-balling the costs.

A professor at Simon Fraser University says the cost to taxpayers could reach up to $6.7 billion.

And let’s be real for a second…

Criminals aren’t going to show up to government offices with their illegal guns.

This gun grab only targets legal-abiding Canadians. This is a point stressed by the National Police Federation.

The NPF said the federal gun grab won’t address “current and emerging themes or urgent threats to public safety,” such as criminal activity, gang violence or the flow of illegal guns across the border.

Not only will the buyback be ineffective, but it could also make things worse.

“It diverts extremely important personnel, resources, and funding away from addressing the more immediate and growing threat of criminal use of illegal firearms,” the NPF said.

 

OPP will not participate in federal gun buyback program, minister says​

The force’s refusal comes after months of negotiations and throws a wrench in Ottawa’s plan.

OTTAWA—The Ontario Provincial Police has refused to participate in the Carney government’s gun buyback program, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree said Wednesday, as he vowed the Liberals will still have a “robust” ability to complete the program with municipal police participation and “collection facilities” across Ontario.

The OPP’s refusal comes after months of negotiations and may throw a wrench in Ottawa’s long-delayed plans to buy back thousands of weapons it’s banned since 2020 following a massacre in Nova Scotia that killed 22 people. It renews questions about the feasibility of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s plan weeks before it is set to begin.

“More information will be forthcoming as we announce the program,” Anandasangaree said as he headed into a Liberal caucus meeting. “I’m very confident that we will have collection facilities available in Ontario.”

“We will have police of jurisdiction — many of them have already signed on, so I’m very confident that we will have a robust ability to collect guns in Ontario,” he added. His office, however, would not provide further details or specifics on what police forces have agreed to participate.

With the provincial force also responsible for more than a quarter of the policing in Ontario, it means the federal government will have to reach agreements with municipal police forces such as Toronto Police, Peel Police and others, while finding a solution to cover areas without a local force.

The Barrie police said in a statement to the Star it had no “current plans” to participate and has had no conversations about doing so. The Hamilton police said “no structured framework or direction” had been provided and no talks have been held since 2023. Toronto police referred the Star to the federal government when asked if they are in any discussions, while police forces in the regions of Peel, York, Halton, Durham and the City of Ottawa did not respond Wednesday afternoon.

“We remain focused on apprehending criminals who use illegal firearms, and we continue to collaborate with our law enforcement partners to address the flow of illegal firearms coming across the border,” said a spokesperson for the Toronto Police Service.

Advocates have raised concerns about the future of the plan that has been a central part of several Liberal party election platforms. Anandasangaree, however, told the Star this summer the program was in the “final stages” of design and will be completed “no later” than the end of 2026. He also confirmed an October 2025 amnesty deadline would have to be pushed back.

But in the face of fierce opposition and questions about the cost of the program — Ottawa’s latest estimates put it at nearly $750 million — the Carney government has recently been describing the plan as “voluntary” while also warning hesitant police forces and provinces that they would be doing their citizens a disservice.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said earlier this month she would not allow police to take banned guns away from their owners while the Saskatchewan government has also added roadblocks to implementing the scheme.

The Doug Ford government, meanwhile, had previously indicated the program was not a priority and it didn’t want provincial funding to pay for it.

In a recent statement, a spokesperson for Solicitor General Michael Kerzner said “Ontario police services do not have the resources to attend residential addresses to confiscate previously lawful but now prohibited firearms from lawful gun owners.”

“Although we will not be participating in this program, Ontario residents will have the opportunity to surrender prohibited firearms at local police stations or register them on the federal portal. The federal government can leverage third party service providers of the RCMP to administer this federal program,” the statement said.

Carney conceded in an interview with media personality Ryan Jespersen that the program would have “different processes in different provinces.”

 

For the record, I’m not a gun owner. But after 30 years in policing — nearly half of that in homicide — I can tell you this: in the roughly 150 cases I investigated and another 150 I assisted in, all but one involved an illegal firearm. The problem on our streets isn’t legal gun owners — it’s illegal guns smuggled from the U.S. In fact, law enforcement managers estimate about 95% of guns seized in crimes come from across the border. Police have their hands full tackling gun crime. Seizing legally obtained firearms is not just misguided — it’s a waste of police resources.

 
A summary of the undercover audio between the Minister of Public Safety and a constituent...

- no compensation for parts

- a collection agency may be used

-no compensation for your firearm based on it's actual value. It is a flat rate based on model

- the minister offered to pay the constituent personally

- Gary admits local police may not enforce laws written into the criminal code

- Gary admits he's still lacking knowledge

- Cape Breton is the kick off

- they're still looking for people to help conduct the confiscation

- Carney gave Gary the mandate to do this work and "put an end to it"

- Gary admits he would focus on actual criminals and blames Quebec for the focus

- Gary admits a massive amount of time has been spent trying to work out how to do it

- Minister admits there be mass noncompliance and offers to pay his constituents's bail

-Gary admits the police don't have the resources to do this

- Gary admits his budget is capped at $742m - Once its gone, that's it

- Gary keeps calling it voluntary- Gary admits again he wouldn't do this confiscation and would focus on illegal firearms being punished much more harshly

 

Public safety minister faces backlash over leaked comments on gun grab program​

Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree has come under fire after a leaked audio recording revealed him discussing the federal gun grab program, making remarks that appeared to suggest the program is being pursued partly for ideological reasons rather than in the interest of public safety.

The approximately 20-minute conversation, recorded without the minister’s knowledge — by a tenant who lives in a Toronto property owned by the minister — was originally shared with the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights (CCFR).

The program, a continuation of the Trudeau-era ban on over 1,500 “assault-style” firearms, is set to launch on Tuesday with a pilot project in Cape Breton.

In the recording, Anandasangaree talks candidly about the program and offers personal assurances to the tenant as well as acknowledging political influences on the decision.

He confirmed gun owners would not be fully compensated for modifications or additional parts that were added to firearms being surrendered, confirming to his tenant that he will “probably” be losing money on his legally obtained firearms.

Anandasangaree explained the gun grab program was “voluntary” and discussed three options: deactivation at the owner’s cost (with federal compensation minus modifications), surrender to the federal government or a collecting agency, or ignoring the program — in which case enforcement would fall to local police.

When talking about a hypothetical situation where he does not surrender his property to local police, the tenant asked the minister if he would then “become a criminal,” to which the minister replied: “probably.”

However, Anandasangaree said he doubted it would escalate to arrests and even offered to personally cover the tenant’s losses or bail him out if necessary.

“I doubt very much it’s going to go that far... I will come and bail you out if that happens,” he revealed. “I just don’t think municipal police forces have the resources to do this.”

Anandasangaree revealed the original budget for the program was $742 million, saying it was a “capped buyback,” raising the question of whether, once the funds are exhausted, firearms owners will still get reimbursed for surrendered property.

Pressed by the tenant, the minister emphasized that the program is being implemented because it was a part of a campaign promise, in particular to the Quebec electorate, describing the province as a “different place than other parts of Canada.”

“It’s very much a big, big, big deal for many of the Quebec electorate that voted for us, and that’s one of the major things,” Anandasangaree said.

“People have said this is one of the things we should not execute... drop it... like as a change from Trudeau’s policies, but we made the decision to go ahead.”

When asked what he would have done differently if he had been involved in the program from the start, Anandasangaree admitted he would have focused on putting people in prison who have illegal firearms and commit violent acts.

He later apologized for his comments on Monday in a statement to the Toronto Star, calling them “misguided” but reiterated his support for the buyback program.

“On Sunday, I had a conversation with an individual I have known for many years, who recorded it without my knowledge before it was distributed by a gun lobbyist,” he wrote.

“I make a point to speak with Canadians who do not support our approach, to listen to their concerns and ensure they understand their options in this voluntary buyback program. In trying to address this individual’s frustrations, my comments were misguided.”

 

In leaked audio, minister doubts police can enforce gun 'buy-back,' says Carney is sticking with it because of Quebec​

OTTAWA — Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree says he doubts local police will have the resources to enforce the Liberals’ mandatory gun “buy-back” program and says the reason Prime Minister Mark Carney is sticking with the policy is to appease voters in Quebec.

That’s according to a roughly 20-minute conversation the minister had on Sunday with an individual, which the minister says is authentic but was recorded without his knowledge and then circulated by a “gun lobbyist.”

In the recording, Anandasangaree reveals to the person he is speaking with that the federal government will announce the next phase of the program on Tuesday and unveil a pilot that will roll out in Cape Breton.

The Liberals had planned to move ahead this fall with the next phase of the program, which would cover individuals who own one of the 1,500 “assault-style firearms” former prime minister Justin Trudeau banned in the wake of the deadly 2020 mass shooting in Nova Scotia.

“Don’t ask me to explain the logic on this to you, OK,” the minister tells the individual he is speaking with, after revealing the date of the forthcoming announcement, adding that the person “may not be happy” with the news.

The individual, who identifies himself as a gun owner, repeatedly questions the minister on the policy. At one point, Anandasangaree offers to pay him the difference in compensation and even bail him out of jail, given that the person informs him that he will not hand over his property.

Under the Liberal program, which the government has already launched for businesses, individuals who own one of the 1,500 “assault-style” firearms banned by the government would be mandated to hand over their guns in exchange for compensation.

The Liberals added another 200 models to that prohibited list earlier this year.

Anandasangaree has publicly acknowledged that the amnesty, which has been in place since 2020, protecting businesses and individuals from criminal liability, would be extended beyond October 2025, but has yet to detail how long.

While the Liberals have always said the program would be mandatory, Anandasangaree repeatedly emphasized it was “voluntary.”

At one point, the individual suggests to the minister that police would have to come to his home to collect his firearms and place him in handcuffs.

“I doubt very much it’s going to go that far,” Anandasangaree says. “I just don’t think municipal police services have the resources to do this.”

Last week, the minister acknowledged to reporters that the Ontario Provincial Police would not be participating in the program.

At another point in the recorded conversation, Anandasangaree said the program’s budget of $742 million would be “capped.”

He also suggested the government would not reach that budgeted amount.

Throughout the recorded conversation, which the minister’s office confirmed was real, Anandasangaree does not appear to be defending the need for the program, but explains why Carney’s government had chosen to stick with it, given the widespread backlash from firearms owners, First Nations, and criticism from the Opposition Conservatives and premiers like Alberta Premier Danielle Smith.

“Like I’m picking up where it was left off, right?” Anandasangaree said. “This is the mandate I was given by Carney to complete this … and not revisit this.”

“That’s my objective, right? Just put an end to this and move on with other additional criminal justice tools,” some of which he lists out, including bail and stiffer penalties for those who have unlicensed firearms.

“Going forward, it will be a different approach, OK,” the minister says. “This is completing something that was started five years ago.”

Asked by the individual whether he has spoken to Carney about the policy, Anandasangaree said that he has had “constant, constant discussions” on the next steps, and the government decided to stick with it, given it was a promise made during the spring election campaign

Pressed again by the person on why not break the campaign promise, Anandasangaree said it was because of Liberal voters in Quebec.

“Quebec is in a different place than other parts of Canada, right? And this is something that (is) very much a big, big, big deal for many of the Quebec electorate that vote for us,” Anandasangaree said.

“That’s one of the major things.”

Near the end of the conversation, Anandasangaree says if he were to “redo” the policy, from the beginning, “I would have a very different approach.”

In a statement to National Post, Anandasangaree defends the conversation by saying his comments to the individual were “misguided.”

“I make a point to speak with Canadians who do not support our approach, to listen to their concerns and ensure they understand their options in this voluntary buyback program. In trying to address this individual’s frustrations, my comments were misguided,” he said in a statement.

“Anyone who knows me or has worked with me knows how seriously I take my job. No one should be mistaken about my unequivocal support for the program.”

 

Leaked audio shows Quebec behind gun ban, minister doesn't support it​

Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree clearly doesn't believe in his own flawed program.

Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree says if it were up to him, the Carney government wouldn’t be moving forward with their gun confiscation plan. But Quebecers love it, and it was a Liberal campaign promise.
Article content

So, despite all of this, the Carney Liberals will go ahead with wasting up to $742 million on their gun confiscation expected to kick off Tuesday with a pilot program in Cape Breton.

The stunning comments from Anandasangaree come from leaked audio posted online by the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights.

In recordings, Anandasangaree can be heard discussing the program, what it will entail, how big it will be and how gun owners won’t get fair compensation from the government. At one point, Anandasangaree even promises to personally top up the amount paid to the person he is speaking with and to bail him out of jail if he is arrested for not complying.

“We’re launching the gun buyback on Tuesday,” Anandasangaree is heard saying.

This is nearly 5 1/2 years after the Trudeau government announced their gun ban and so-called “buyback” program on May 1, 2020. They have yet to take any guns from licencsd owners, but it has been illegal for these licensed owners to use their guns since that date.

Despite that fact, gun crime has continued to increase.

“Don’t ask me to explain the logic to you on this, OK?” said Anandasangaree.

The free-flowing 20 minute conversation is between Anandasangaree and a man who is a tenant living in one of the minister’s rental properties and who happens to be a gun owner. As the man, identified only as Shawn speaks up in defence of gun owners, and Anandasangaree sounds sympathetic.

As the Carney government has walked away from several Trudeau-era policies, there had been hope among licensed gun owners that they may walk away from this one. Anandasangaree acknowledged that some would like the government to do so, but it’s not in the cards.

“You’ve seen these articles where people said, you know, this is one of the things we should not execute, like as a change from Trudeau’s policies, but we’ve made the decision to go ahead,” Anandasangaree said.

The reason he gave was all about politics and a promise to Quebec.

“Quebec is in a different place than other parts of Canada, right? And this is something that is very much a big, big, big deal for many of the Quebec electorate that voted for us,” he said.

What Anandasangaree really means is that banning guns is very popular in Montreal and among Liberal voters. The reality in Quebec is that gun ownership is widespread, but more concentrated in regions that aren’t voting Liberal.

Among the other comments Anandasangaree made was the fact that the government won’t go above $742 million in compensation for gun owners forced to hand over their firearms. That means many will not get proper or fair market value for their guns, and they won’t get anything for equipment they bought for the now banned guns rendered useless by the ban.

It’s hard to see how the minister moves forward with a gun ban and “buyback” now that the public knows he clearly doesn’t believe in it. A request for comment from Anandasangaree’s office went unanswered on Monday afternoon though he did reply to the Toronto Star, saying that his comments were “misguided.”

Misguided is this entire plan.

The government still doesn’t have the resources to collect all the guns they have banned and as Anandasangaree said in the recording, police don’t have the resources to enforce this. At one point it sounds like the minister is encouraging non-compliance with the law and the plan he is about to announce.

This plan is clearly about politics, not public safety and even the minister has now admitted that. It’s time for Carney to abandon this bad Trudeau-era idea and focus on real gun crime.

 

Coles Notes:

1. Cape Breton starts today- pilot project

2. It is voluntary, but mandatory ???
It's voluntary to participate in "the buy back", so no confiscation
But after the amnesty, if you still have one, you are committing a criminal act by being in possession of said firearms

3. If you turn in your gun or deactivate it by a gunsmith you will be financially compensated
Submitting a declaration will not guarantee compensation.
Compensation payments will be issued to individual owners once their prohibited firearms have been fully processed by the program i.e. will give whatever they want, whenever they want, if ever.

4. Amnesty will be extended to October 2026

5. No news on expansion into other areas or provinces

6. They really want to ban the sks
 
Last edited:

Government of Canada moves forward with the Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program for individual firearms owners​


News release

September 23, 2025 – Ottawa, Ontario

The Government of Canada is moving forward with the implementation of the voluntary Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program (ASFCP) for individual firearms owners, starting with a pilot in Nova Scotia that begins today. The compensation program will then open to all eligible firearms owners with a nation-wide declaration period later in fall 2025, followed by a collection and compensation period in 2026.

Small-scale pilot

Starting today, a small-scale pilot for individual firearms owners will begin in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, and is expected to run for approximately six weeks to test program elements while collecting an initial 200 assault-style firearms. Participation in the pilot is voluntary and will be conducted in collaboration with the Cape Breton Regional Police. It will test the online portal, the collection and destruction process, as well as the system for issuing compensation payments to participants. Support from a dedicated contact centre will be provided to all participants. The pilot will allow us to identify any gaps or challenges in the system and ensure the program is operating smoothly before being opened nation-wide.

Nation-wide declaration period

Following the pilot, eligible firearm owners across Canada will be contacted by mail or email to provide them with the information needed to take part in the program and declare their prohibited firearms. Only those who declare their affected firearms may be considered for the collection process and seek compensation. While the program is voluntary, those who do not participate in it will not be able to seek compensation and will have to dispose of their prohibited firearms by exporting, deactivating or turning them into police without compensation to be compliant with the law before the end of the amnesty period.

Collection and compensation period

In early 2026, firearms owners whose declarations have been approved will then finalize their claims and book collection appointments with local police of jurisdiction to turn in those firearms. Following the validation and verification of the firearms, they will receive payment by cheque or direct deposit within weeks.

Program reopening for businesses

Earlier in 2025, the ASFCP for businesses ran successfully, collecting more than 12,000 prohibited firearms from across Canada. It will reopen for businesses in the coming weeks to receive claims for firearms prohibited in December 2024 and March 2025, and to continue accepting claims for those prohibited in May 2020.

Complying with the law

Now totalling over 2,500 makes and models, these prohibited assault-style firearms can no longer be legally possessed, sold in, or imported into Canada and can only be transferred or transported under limited circumstances. The compensation program is an option for individual firearm owners and businesses to seek compensation and dispose of their prohibited firearms before the end of the amnesty period.

Amnesty Orders are in place to protect affected owners and businesses from criminal liability while they take steps to come into compliance with the law. To ensure that firearm owners and businesses have enough time to dispose of these firearms and comply with the law, the Government of Canada is assessing the appropriate time required to extend the current amnesty order. All affected firearm owners or businesses will have to comply with the law by the end of the amnesty period, to avoid criminal liability for the illegal possession of a prohibited firearm.

 
Back
Top