That's all kinds of wrong.saw this on island fisherman thought it’s kinda interesting now all these numbers are based off of 15 and 18lb lead
the blue is the number you need to be at in order to hit the depth in orange
Lol wait till you find the article and read the equation he used with cosign and other mathematical equationsThat's all kinds of wrong.
Lol wait till you find the article and read the equation he used with cosign and other mathematical equations
Exactly! See fish on sounder lower lines until you get a hit. That's your depth. Too many variables to worry about. It will give you an idea how deep you are but if you have the right transducer it is right there on your screen.Uhhhhh, what downrigger line? Braid? Wire? What diameter?
Never heard that before, but I can’t see down 250’ either lol. I know angle gets me more fish than watching SOG…Cable angle isn't constant. You can have 60* at the surface and almost vertical at the ball. I usually aim for about 45*. I was fishing 220' last night and hitting bottom with about 250 with braid and 18 lbs balls.
It really doesn't matter what depth I'm at. The fish come to me.Trigonometry is cool and very useful in some things. But like most already stated, there is just too many variables with downriggers. We pay attention to the action of the gear when we are putting it down, and the angle of the dangle (downrigger). If we are fishing deep we will run down and smack bottom which gives you an idea of the relationship between rigger counter and actual depth. If fishing shallow we hope the counter is close. To be honest (and I'm sure many here will disagree) if a fish is so picky that it won't move up or down 10' or 15' feet to smack my lure I figure it probably wasn't going to hit it if I put it right in front of it's face either.
Bingo…I can see my downrigger balls on the screen so I know where they are at. This isn’t the best photo but ones at 70 something and ones at 80 something
Rigger cable thickness is a huge factor. Had to run my spare rigger yesterday with the junk Scotty braid, hung back way more than the power pro on the other side.
I agree. Just to confirm, I charted it and confirmed that this assumes the angle is constant, the chart was linear which would be incorrect. Needs to account for the curve. Sure math with some physics can solve this, but as you note, there are SO many other factors that would change how deep you really go (currents, speed, line thickness & type, cannonball shape and more).Unfortunately all wrong, as Rain City said. The issue is that he assumes the angle at the surface is constant - it's not so trig is useless. Apart from the other influences mentioned, the arc made by the line is actually parabolic, with a steeper angle at the surface, curving gradually to almost vertical near the ball. The influences will cause the curve to slightly vary in shape. Calculations can be done but as mentioned, why bother. There are easier ways.