Just sent this off to the Times Colonist Editorial.
After watching a recent local newscast about the recent DFO meetings with both recreational anglers and also native groups to discuss ongoing decreases in some Fraser River Chinook salmon numbers, something caught my attention. The native spokesman indicated that his group was willing to stand down and accept short term pain for long term gain and suggested recreational anglers do the same. As a 26 year career sport fishing charter operator I would like to take him up on his offer. I would gladly park my boat and ask all my fellow recreational anglers to do the same if the people he represents agree to do the same. Also agree to mutually verifiable compliance and also allow unobstructed DFO enforcement of infractions as they occur by either group. I would gladly step down to see some real progress towards rebuilding Fraser River stocks of concern. DFO's own data indicates that 35% (by far the largest portion) of these fish are caught and killed within the Fraser River itself. Voluntarily removing the unselective gill nets from the river during the salmon's spawning run for a few years will help immensely. So I will take this offer as it appears this may be the only real hope local wild salmon and also local killer whales have at rebounding.
Rollie Rose, Sooke Salmon Charters Ltd
Victoria, B.C.
250-213-3055
I've been asked to dial down my posting frequency (I'm a newby) and I certainly intend to do that but...this is a very smart strategy.
Looking at it from the public perspective: we look great!
1) initiated by F.N.'s
2) cooperative opportunity with F,N.'s - "partnership" for conservation
3) illustrates a serious and significant commitment
4) motivated by our sincere interest in conservation
5) rec. side seen making a sacrifice
6) long-established charter operator loses big revenue - another sacrifice from the rec. side
This should get us some great media attention.
For us it:
6) forces DFO's hand to take action and be accountable in enforcement
7) big downside if FN's are not complying - broken agreement with us (and promise to the public)
8) has no downside for us - other than spending a summer avoiding chinooks, as long as we stay in compliance
We would have to ensure our full compliance and enforce that or this will backfire dramatically.
Could we get a pledge sheet going with all the rec. guys that will commit to this? Then get Hume back to report this very positive response from the recreational side. - call his bluff! I'm in for sure. Big numbers signing from our side would sure look good for us.
Just had to say - now I'll stand down for a bit.