SpringVelocity
Crew Member
I don't fish tuna, but how does this area directly impact sport fishing? I think that area is too far anyway. Is it even a commercial tuna spot?
New MPA, no fishing allowed.
- Thread starter OldBlackDog
- Start date
Capt. Jack
Member
There's a UN Agenda 2050 now?
SpringVelocity
Crew Member
I checked into it looks like it doesn't bother our sportfishing sector at all.
ship happens
Crew Member
I think it's jist the fact that they actually did it, and you know what happens everytime these guys get their foot stuffed in the door. They just want more.
IronNoggin
Well-Known Member
Yes. WAS being the operative word.
SpringVelocity
Crew Member
Oh I didn't know it was commercial tuna area.
SpringFever552
Well-Known Member
Anyone saying its to far to fish should tell that to the chinese governments fleets fishing all over the world
SpringVelocity
Crew Member
OK will tell them but they won't listen to me....
It does not impact tuna fishing in any way. Straight from the act:
gazette.gc.ca
Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volume 158, Number 13: Tang.ɢwan {|mdash|} ḥačxwiqak {|mdash|} Tsig̱is Marine Protected Area Regulations
June 19, 2024, Part 2, Volume 158, Number 13, Canada Gazette
SpringVelocity
Crew Member
I read it again. Almost fell asleep. On surface it's seem OK, but reading further it points to doors of trouble with the minister moving forward. Have to wait an see.
I don't care about MPA but government really locked out our rec sector on the implementation of any of these.
Believe it or not Area 17 is on the map for marine park MPA. Not joking either. It hasn't been done but it isn't dead either. We have to get involved in these. Once there in that's it.
The problem is the liberals like to work in closed doors and are not doing this as a true roundtable process. You can't exclude sectors from something as big as these. It affects multiple sectors on the coast and general public.
I don't care about MPA but government really locked out our rec sector on the implementation of any of these.
Believe it or not Area 17 is on the map for marine park MPA. Not joking either. It hasn't been done but it isn't dead either. We have to get involved in these. Once there in that's it.
The problem is the liberals like to work in closed doors and are not doing this as a true roundtable process. You can't exclude sectors from something as big as these. It affects multiple sectors on the coast and general public.
Last edited:
PEETZcanada
Well-Known Member
Yes it is and it is one of the main ones that I warned about so many years ago...we all know how my news was accepted back then, so I don't know that I would worry my self to death about the future any longer. Work rest and play for today. Enjoy what you have now and wiggle around the changes like a comeleon in order to still have a good life. It is what it is and I just smile and wave now. Look at the brightest side of life always, crying about the past(once it is done) accomplished nothing but darkness. Stay in the light.
This message is not pointed towards anyone it is writen and presented in general terms in regard to the way I am now,
Cheers.
IronNoggin
Well-Known Member
It does not impact tuna fishing in any way. Straight from the act:
Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volume 158, Number 13: Tang.ɢwan {|mdash|} ḥačxwiqak {|mdash|} Tsig̱is Marine Protected Area Regulations
June 19, 2024, Part 2, Volume 158, Number 13, Canada Gazette
Well I'll be damned!
Thanks for sharing!
Similar threads
