Hoochiebob
Well-Known Member
And once again, those fishing Sidney waters have to hope for a spring that falls between 62 and 67 cm. Gonna need scissors or a fish stretcher for that one...
The fellas out there fishing are contributing to wiping out the early Fraser river chinook.I fish chinook in the Fraser,and will gladly lay my rod down this summer in the name of conservation.I did not fish the Thompson opening last year for steelhead,it was so wrong to fish that endangered run of fish.Everyone and every sector needs to smarten the hell up and get on the same page.Consider all the fellas and guides that work the Fraser.Motels,hotels and restaurants here in the wack that will be affected by this. Simply ridiculous!Not questioning any of your facts...
It is ignorant to point fingers at individuals on this forum for how they make a living. If you were a commercial troller, and DFO gave you an opening, would you choose to stay at home to protect salmon stocks? Go ahead and bash DFO all you want, but don't judge the people out there working to earn a few bucks.
While you make a few valid points - you fail to mention most of our value added resources are being shipped offshore.The biggest problem is punishing our area for lack of forsight - another thing look at the areas left open - one would assume they're part of the migration route for incomming Fraser Springs!I heard a funny quote in a enviroment and sustainability course. "Sustainable logging is not rocket science, it's
much more complicated". I think this is applicable to fisheries aswell.
My opinion is that DFO is far from properly managing fish stocks but at the same time it's not as simple a topic as most people believe. There is a huge (unsustainable) market for fish and commercial fishing supplies that. Therefore thy have a right to supply the public to some degree. Therefore people shouldn't form lynch mobs Everytime they see a commercial opening. Natives are a whole seperate topic but seem to be mixing more commercially than ceremonially. That's a huge issue in its self.
Wolf you should check your numbers. 10,000 pieces were taken. I'm not sure of the number of boats but it's likely more than 50 therefore 200 fish per boat at max. They are providing the public with fish just the same as you provide the public with fish and an experience. They two jobs are more similar than you seem to think so perhaps you should get off YOUR high horse.
While you make a few valid points - you fail to mention most of our value added resources are being shipped offshore.The biggest problem is punishing our area for lack of forsight - another thing look at the areas left open - one would assume they're part of the migration route for incomming Fraser Springs!
There is a huge (unsustainable) market for fish and commercial fishing supplies that. Therefore thy have a right to supply the public to some degree.
QUOTE]
Kelly
The precise number of Chinook taken by the Commercial Trollers in 5 days only is 10,600 AND as of May 1 they have been given permission to take over 40,000 more. How many boats took these fish is irrelevant.
What we are talking about here is endangered Chinook. Not the Chinook the Commercial Industry take for example in the Alberni Inlet after the return of Chinook to the river has been met AND not Halaibut, Sockeye, Pinks or Chum which the Commercial Fishery dominate.
The southern waters of Juan de Fuca is presently under severe restrictions with threats of further restrictions in June to protect the very Chinook that are presently passing thru the northern Vancouver Island waters.
DFO know that and have even mentioned their concern in their own web site...but money talks!
The easy question is; why are we allowing this unrestricted fishery of Chinook to take well over 50,000 pieces (which certainly include the endangered Fraser River Chinook) when the other user group is under DFO placed severe restrictions AND the threat of even more restrictions come June. Answer...money and because many of these fish are Americans and we don't care about their returns.
If you are a Commercial Fishermen you just want to make money....just like the Seiners of the past who did so much damage to the Chinook fishery ALL while under the management of DFO and just like the Foreign Owned Fish Farms are threating all the salmon species. (I have a friend who with some investors tried fish farming over 10 years ago when it first came on the scene.
He lost all his Chinook stock for two years in a row as did all the others who tried it with Pacific Coast Chinook and that's why the Atlantic salmon are presently being used. That's ATLANTIC salmon....why don't they keep them in the Atlantic.)
There is more frustration then enough to go around...the Commercia Troll Chinook Fishery just adds to the nonsense of it all.
I heard a funny quote in a enviroment and sustainability course. "Sustainable logging is not rocket science, it's
much more complicated". I think this is applicable to fisheries aswell.
My opinion is that DFO is far from properly managing fish stocks but at the same time it's not as simple a topic as most people believe. There is a huge (unsustainable) market for fish and commercial fishing supplies that. Therefore thy have a right to supply the public to some degree. Therefore people shouldn't form lynch mobs Everytime they see a commercial opening. Natives are a whole seperate topic but seem to be mixing more commercially than ceremonially. That's a huge issue in its self.
Wolf you should check your numbers. 10,000 pieces were taken. I'm not sure of the number of boats but it's likely more than 50 therefore 200 fish per boat at max. They are providing the public with fish just the same as you provide the public with fish and an experience. They two jobs are more similar than you seem to think so perhaps you should get off YOUR high horse.
They are providing the public with fish just the same as you provide the public with fish and an experience. They two jobs are more similar than you seem to think.
The easy question is; why are we allowing this unrestricted fishery of Chinook to take well over 50,000 pieces
Yup. In an ideal world. However, in the past the cut-backs were not equitable. We give up a lot, while other sectors have given little or nothing.It should really be simple math. If we need to cut back, all sectors need to cut back what ever need be to get the resource back to solid number.
again, in an ideal world. However, with the "experimental" halibut model, the quota holders do, effectively own the fish. We may buy quota from them which demonstrates their ownership.Nobody owns these fish and we are lucky we have the right to fish them at all.
I believe we could manage them properly but it has been impressively demonstrated that D.F.O. cannot. Sustainability, allocations and management models are within the purvue of D.F.O., not with us. Considering where the power lies - with corporations like Marine Harvest and Canfisco (Pattison) - greed will be always be in play. The Harper government and DFO is their partner. Greed is a CEO's mission - increase profits and returns to shareholders (or die). Marine Harvest has demonstrated no citizenship in Chile - no profit; move on. The environment and people be damned. Canfisco Communications speaks about harvesting sustainable wild salmon resources, providing employment with the largest fleet in B.C. Well, I was born at night ... but not last night. When the salmon are gone, they'll be gone too - jobs and all.If we all can manage them properly, there will be fish for the future. If greed kicks in, we are all f@#ked
I certainly didn't cover it all and am not trying to play devils advocate but a lot of arguments on this site tend to ignore the other side of the picture.
50,000 pcs???OMG this is insanity!!!This kind of greed has us heading for disaster.Reminds me of the East Coast Cod fishery.Very sad news indeed.There is a huge (unsustainable) market for fish and commercial fishing supplies that. Therefore thy have a right to supply the public to some degree.
QUOTE]
Kelly
The precise number of Chinook taken by the Commercial Trollers in 5 days only is 10,600 AND as of May 1 they have been given permission to take over 40,000 more. How many boats took these fish is irrelevant.
What we are talking about here is endangered Chinook. Not the Chinook the Commercial Industry take for example in the Alberni Inlet after the return of Chinook to the river has been met AND not Halaibut, Sockeye, Pinks or Chum which the Commercial Fishery dominate.
The southern waters of Juan de Fuca is presently under severe restrictions with threats of further restrictions in June to protect the very Chinook that are presently passing thru the northern Vancouver Island waters.
DFO know that and have even mentioned their concern in their own web site...but money talks!
The easy question is; why are we allowing this unrestricted fishery of Chinook to take well over 50,000 pieces (which certainly include the endangered Fraser River Chinook) when the other user group is under DFO placed severe restrictions AND the threat of even more restrictions come June. Answer...money and because many of these fish are Americans and we don't care about their returns.
If you are a Commercial Fishermen you just want to make money....just like the Seiners of the past who did so much damage to the Chinook fishery ALL while under the management of DFO and just like the Foreign Owned Fish Farms are threating all the salmon species. (I have a friend who with some investors tried fish farming over 10 years ago when it first came on the scene.
He lost all his Chinook stock for two years in a row as did all the others who tried it with Pacific Coast Chinook and that's why the Atlantic salmon are presently being used. That's ATLANTIC salmon....why don't they keep them in the Atlantic.)
There is more frustration then enough to go around...the Commercia Troll Chinook Fishery just adds to the nonsense of it all.
50,000 pcs???OMG this is insanity!!!This kind of greed has us heading for disaster.Reminds me of the East Coast Cod fishery.Very sad news indeed.
Lets face it we're all greedy for our own needs. Sports fishermen want Commercials and FN shut down so we can have a greater share.
Do you think the others feel the same ? I bet they do.
Bottom line is, if the stocks are sustainable let every user group have a fair share with conservation first and foremost.
If the stocks are not sustainable, all user groups have to share responsibility for the preservation of the fish.
Greed is what put us in this mess in the first place, lets not let greed finish it.
x53-8523-60249634-29289642-6483658934968023
Lorne