Yup, exactly SH. The word is "expropriation" - the word that Parks Canada whitewashes from all it's promotional literature. Really horrible history of Parks Canada doing just that across Canada - esp. out East where it started 1st. Wrong federal agency used to regulate fishing, and the wrong "go-to" tool in the toolbox. It's like using a hammer to finish drywall.Yup and once a piece of land or in this case lala land, gets in the hand of parks canada its there forever. Carney is going to make sure it happens. 2030 is such a good plan. Soo goood
I had to deal with parks canada one time on a property I was trying to buy. There was an outbuilding that was encroached onto the neighboring lot ( parks ). It took alot of effort to talk to the higher ups in the parks department of the city of Delta. To see what the possibility was for selling me a sliver of land so that there was a legal setback from the outbuilding. Long story short, when I did finally talk to the head guy down at city hall, he basically told me there's only one way parks will ever give up property and that's if you trade them up somthing they really want. He said their whole agenda is to aquire land. In their eyes they want all the land. It's messed up. Never bought the property because of that.Yup, exactly SH. The word is "expropriation" - the word that Parks Canada whitewashes from all it's promotional literature. Really horrible history of Parks Canada doing just that across Canada - esp. out East where it started 1st. Wrong federal agency used to regulate fishing, and the wrong "go-to" tool in the toolbox. It's like using a hammer to finish drywall.
Electing the same party (and people) expecting they will somehow change their values, views and policies is sort of silly IMO. There should be no surprises - its very predictable - we will see the excuse train fire up on why we don't need to invest in pipelines to create a Canadian energy policy. The past policy approach will be repeated - highly improbable a change in leader will result in a significant shift in policy performance and decisions that invest in making changes necessary for implementing a Canadian "only" oil and gas national policy.Bizarre choice for sure he was spouting off against carneys pipelines ideas yesterday
It's just a 25 year old conspercy theory. Don't worry about it. I did say way,way back that it would keep on coming and not stop until everything was in play. Is what it is.Sorry guys I forgot he is going to be a pain in butt! This is going to be fun. Steven Guilbeault is in charge of Parks Canada. MPA's here we come.
View attachment 116960
I would say opening up Canada for natural resource sales! But they are liberals so we can expect a giant solar farm in northern bc. LolEconomy ???? Oh ya.... like opening up BC for more fish farms.![]()
Liberal finger prints all over those ones.Reconciliation and more protected areas made the Throne Speech......... and gun control.
Well it is up to the official opposition MP to actual voice the concerns isn't it? So far I have heard nothing which is pretty typical like last time.
Talked to Aaron (Gunn) today. He is going to go see the minister next week and explain how deeply scenarios 3-5 would affect the coast and coastal economies.
If there’s one thing I know about him after working with him all election it’s he works damn hard and won’t shy away from standing up for people
It doesn't really matter where the minister is from. Look at Jonathan Wilkinson. He was completely useless.