Maintain Priority Access to Chinook and Coho for the Canadian Public in a New Salmon Allocation Policy. Send Your Letter to DFO!

(xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam), Sḵwx̱wú7mesh (Squamish) and səlilwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh)/Vancouver, B.C.) Recreational participants in the Salmon Allocation Policy (SAP) review process have cultivated a dangerous and offensive online campaign through social media, websites and forums that spreads misinformation about First Nations’ positions in the review process and what it may mean for non-Indigenous Canadians.

The SAP has been ongoing for several years in an effort to ensure that First Nations rights with respect to salmon allocation are being upheld by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). Catalyzed by the Ahousaht et al. Decision, the SAP review process has been inclusive of non-Indigenous recreational and commercial representatives. The review process is governed by a Terms of Reference that specifically requires accuracy and transparency in the communications to constituents. Despite this clear directive, the campaign has cultivated an environment in which anti-Indigenous racism is thriving, creating the very real risk of physical and psychological damage for First Nations people.

BCAFN Regional Chief Terry Teegee stated, “When campaigns of hate against First Nations are not actively and publicly opposed by our public servants at the highest level, racism becomes further entrenched in the minds of Canadians and in our institutions. It threatens the safety, wellbeing and livelihoods of First Nations people while legitimizing and contributing to racial division. We expect that DFO Minister Thompson deeply respects her obligations to fulfill First Nations fishing rights under Section 35 of the Constitution Act, UNDA and case law. Now is the time to demonstrate reconciliation in action and stand up to those wish to sow further division in Canada.”

As the convener of this process and Crown entity, DFO is actively accountable for ensuring adherence to the Terms of Reference, application of the UN Declaration and reconciliation principles and respectful, Nation-to-Nation engagement. The FNLC calls on DFO Minister Thompson to immediately issue a statement that denounces, debunks and condemns these hateful actions that recreational fishing participants have taken. In the meantime, the risk of West Coast fish wars grows. Additionally, the Minister must not consider external submissions from recreational fishers, who may have been influenced by the recreational representatives’ hate propaganda.

First Nations Summit Political Executive, Robert Phillips elaborated, “We are in a delicate time in Canada when it comes to reconciliation and now is not the time to regress in First Nations-settler relationships and Nation-to-Nation relationships. First Nations have been blowing the whistle throughout the SAP review process, alerting DFO to racist sentiments from recreational fishing representatives, which DFO has failed to combat. Our government partners must go to bat now for First Nations- they can no longer be silent bystanders while the risk of violence against First Nations people grows. The SAP review process can still be salvaged so long as DFO takes its responsibilities seriously.”

UBCIC President Grand Chief Stewart Phillip concluded, “As our First Nations have always maintained- we are not greedy people. We want to share; we just need our rights to be upheld so that we are actually in the position to do so. First Nations prosperity and rights implementation do not come at a cost to non-Indigenous Canadians. The assertion that First Nations rights are taking away from the general public is a dangerous and false narrative that is fanning the flame of discrimination in B.C. and across Canada. We won’t stand for it and expect that the Crown will not stand for it either.”

The First Nations Leadership Council is composed of the political executives of the BC Assembly of First Nations, the First Nations Summit, and the Union of BC Indian Chiefs. For more information, please visit www.fnlc.ca.

Read the FNLC press release on the BCAFN website here: https://www.bcafn.ca/news/fnlc-cond...cist-campaign-against-first-nations-and-their
 
They want the public voices to be silenced, weird how reconciliation is supposed to to work.

“Additionally, the Minister must not consider external submissions from recreational fishers”

Exclusive priority access is not sharing

Must be concerned the public is finally catching on
 
Last edited:
Here is the reporter's email address: Kendall Hanson <khanson@cheknews.ca>

Here is what I sent his boss and cc'd him:

I am writing to express my sincere disappointment regarding the coverage of this rally.
Your reporter made this a divide solely between recreational anglers and supposedly starving whales.
He entirely missed the FAR larger issue of FN's and the commercial sector (by and large one and the same these days) attempting to persuade the government to nullify the recreational sector's current priority status for coho and chinook, and instead hand that over to them while putting the affected sector on a quota system (with caps) as was done with halibut. This in order to increase their "portion of the pie", elevate their economic position on the backs of the salmon resource, and greatly reduce the recreational access to salmon coast-wide.

I consider this to be VERY biased reporting.
It appears that the Recreational fishing sector was deliberately marginalized and their concerns deliberately trivialized.
The public deserves to know the real impact from the real measures being proposed, not a sideline issue which paints the recreational sector in a negative light.

If this was not intentional, I would very much like to see a written apology, retraction and a follow-up article reporting the actual FULL facts involved here.

It it was intentional, I am rather surprised that CHEK would condone such bias in their reporting.

I would appreciate the courtesy of a written response at your convenience.

Sincerely,
Any response Nog ?
 
Gord Johns has defended himself on his Facebook page. Standing behind his statements. I suggest everyone on social media let him know how you feel.

He is tilting and deflecting that the conservatives have started fear mongering everyone. So untrue.
I am certainly not a conservative. I was at the townhall and listened carefully to the speakers. I am sorry, the conservatives were not fear mongering in any way. I heard plenty of points made that were based upon the discussion/policy papers that have already been circulated. These were not conservative issued policy papers. Johns is just flat out wrong on this point.
With respect to "everyone will still be able to fish". My buddies who are trollers on the north coast are still able to fish. Their chinook season STARTS on Aug 16th. In my mind, that is not a fishing season it is just a token season. This is what the rec guys are fighting to ensure, a real fishing opportunity, not just a few scraps after all the other obligations have been met.
Given how DFO and our various levels of govt have treated everybody recently, I don't blame people for being worried and I don't blame the lack of trust in statements made by Johns.
 
And just like that we are told to F off. Just like last November

Old video from fall I believe
 
In the end gentlemen the FN letters are really a nothing Burger... Our issue is with Ottawa( DFO) it's not with FN or Commercial fishers..
 
Regarding SAP process right now that is in front of us it is Ottawa we need to be focused on. FN can put there feedback in however they see fit and the accusations that are being put forward are not true and we must not be distracted by it. As we pivot to Ottawa in the next coming weeks we must be ready to send letters to are local MP and Minister of Fisheries. People need to reach out to there MPs for a frank conversation about the SAP. Respectful Political pressure is what is require right now. As for Gord it will be yours and all of us in his riding to ensure that he is not elected again as he has shown that he has No respect for the business & voters in his riding that are connect to fishing.
 
I am certainly not a conservative. I was at the townhall and listened carefully to the speakers. I am sorry, the conservatives were not fear mongering in any way. I heard plenty of points made that were based upon the discussion/policy papers that have already been circulated. These were not conservative issued policy papers. Johns is just flat out wrong on this point.
With respect to "everyone will still be able to fish". My buddies who are trollers on the north coast are still able to fish. Their chinook season STARTS on Aug 16th. In my mind, that is not a fishing season it is just a token season. This is what the rec guys are fighting to ensure, a real fishing opportunity, not just a few scraps after all the other obligations have been met.
Given how DFO and our various levels of govt have treated everybody recently, I don't blame people for being worried and I don't blame the lack of trust in statements made by Johns.
Agreed. He is so off the mark it is shocking. This whole "if you don't agree you're a racist" narrative is getting very frustrating. I felt compelled to tell him as much:

Hello MP Johns,

As a sport fisherman, and a former NDP voter I am seriously disappointed in your recent statements regarding the proposed changes to the Salmon Allocation Policy, and your willingness to paint any debate on the matter as racism and "fear mongering" perpetrated by Conservative MP's.

I am not a Conservative voter. I have never voted Conservative in my life. My concerns about the proposed SAP changes have nothing to do with what Conservative MP's have to say about it, and everything to do with supporting the position of the Sport Fishing Advisory Board - who were specifically included as a stakeholder in the Salmon Allocation Policy review process according to the Terms of Reference. I am also exercising my right to submit feedback to the public consultation process that closed on January 23rd, and like all members of the public was directly invited to do so by DFO. That an elected official (ie you) would go on record disputing and invalidating the perspective of the SFAB, as well as passing judgement on the concerns brought forward through the consultation process, implying they are based in racism and Conservative "fear mongering" is quite simply shameful. Why should the public place trust in the consultation process if - at least when it comes to the perspectives of the recreational sector - you clearly do not?

The fact is I have spoken to my MP about this, in person - who happens to be a Conservative. I didn't vote for her in the last election, but she is my elected representative so that is who I spoke to. She did not bring her perspective to me - I brought mine to HER. As did other constituents. If she and other Conservative MP's choose to take those concerns forward to Ottawa - well, isn't that how representation is supposed to work?

The fact also is that I have emailed YOU about this in the past, and you did not feel fit to register a response. In fact, I emailed every MP with a riding bordering the Pacific Ocean - regardless of party. Feel free to search your inbox for the subject "ATTENTION: Coastal BC MP's re changes to Salmon Allocation Policy". My email will be there. If you actually take the time to read it this time, I am confident you will see my concerns have absolutely no basis is "racism" and "fear mongering". Of all of the MP's on the Coast that I emailed, can you guess how many NDP, Green, or Liberals took the time to respond? Zero. The same number that took the time to attend the Town Hall in Duncan last weekend.

In your recent interview on Chek News, part of the explanation for your absence at this Town Hall was that Conservative MP's would be speaking at it. So what? Are you so biased to party lines that you could not deign to show your face in the same building as your colleagues from across the aisle? Does their mere presence render the concerns of everyone else in attendance unworthy of your time and consideration - including many citizens from your own riding? If you are so confident that mountains are being made out of mole holes - why don't you show up the next time and present a balanced counterpoint? If - as you assert - misinformation is being allowed to spread - why don't you engage directly with those concerned and explain your position? Make an honest attempt to explain why we should not be worried. And field those questions on the spot - not filtered through a sympathetic interviewer or carefully wordsmithed - yet somehow, still completely tone deaf - statement on your Facebook page.

I expect no response to this email. I expect you will say "not my riding, not my problem" - however your recent comments in the news media and your personal Facebook page were not just directed at your riding. They were directed at the recreational fishing sector at large, and as a member of that sector I feel obliged to respond. Your comments are premature at best, disrespect the consultation process DFO has undertaken, and are entirely dismissive of the legitimate concerns of an entire sector, including the official representation of that sector as defined in the Terms of Reference for the Salmon Allocation Policy review. Worse, you have eagerly aligned yourself with the narrative that anything less than complete agreement with the perspectives put forward by the other stakeholders in that process should be equated to colonialism, racism, and fear mongering.

This is deeply offensive, and deeply disappointing from an elected member of Parliament - regardless of party affiliation. Statements of apology have been issued for much less.
 
Agreed. He is so off the mark it is shocking. This whole "if you don't agree you're a racist" narrative is getting very frustrating. I felt compelled to tell him as much:

Hello MP Johns,

As a sport fisherman, and a former NDP voter I am seriously disappointed in your recent statements regarding the proposed changes to the Salmon Allocation Policy, and your willingness to paint any debate on the matter as racism and "fear mongering" perpetrated by Conservative MP's.

I am not a Conservative voter. I have never voted Conservative in my life. My concerns about the proposed SAP changes have nothing to do with what Conservative MP's have to say about it, and everything to do with supporting the position of the Sport Fishing Advisory Board - who were specifically included as a stakeholder in the Salmon Allocation Policy review process according to the Terms of Reference. I am also exercising my right to submit feedback to the public consultation process that closed on January 23rd, and like all members of the public was directly invited to do so by DFO. That an elected official (ie you) would go on record disputing and invalidating the perspective of the SFAB, as well as passing judgement on the concerns brought forward through the consultation process, implying they are based in racism and Conservative "fear mongering" is quite simply shameful. Why should the public place trust in the consultation process if - at least when it comes to the perspectives of the recreational sector - you clearly do not?

The fact is I have spoken to my MP about this, in person - who happens to be a Conservative. I didn't vote for her in the last election, but she is my elected representative so that is who I spoke to. She did not bring her perspective to me - I brought mine to HER. As did other constituents. If she and other Conservative MP's choose to take those concerns forward to Ottawa - well, isn't that how representation is supposed to work?

The fact also is that I have emailed YOU about this in the past, and you did not feel fit to register a response. In fact, I emailed every MP with a riding bordering the Pacific Ocean - regardless of party. Feel free to search your inbox for the subject "ATTENTION: Coastal BC MP's re changes to Salmon Allocation Policy". My email will be there. If you actually take the time to read it this time, I am confident you will see my concerns have absolutely no basis is "racism" and "fear mongering". Of all of the MP's on the Coast that I emailed, can you guess how many NDP, Green, or Liberals took the time to respond? Zero. The same number that took the time to attend the Town Hall in Duncan last weekend.

In your recent interview on Chek News, part of the explanation for your absence at this Town Hall was that Conservative MP's would be speaking at it. So what? Are you so biased to party lines that you could not deign to show your face in the same building as your colleagues from across the aisle? Does their mere presence render the concerns of everyone else in attendance unworthy of your time and consideration - including many citizens from your own riding? If you are so confident that mountains are being made out of mole holes - why don't you show up the next time and present a balanced counterpoint? If - as you assert - misinformation is being allowed to spread - why don't you engage directly with those concerned and explain your position? Make an honest attempt to explain why we should not be worried. And field those questions on the spot - not filtered through a sympathetic interviewer or carefully wordsmithed - yet somehow, still completely tone deaf - statement on your Facebook page.

I expect no response to this email. I expect you will say "not my riding, not my problem" - however your recent comments in the news media and your personal Facebook page were not just directed at your riding. They were directed at the recreational fishing sector at large, and as a member of that sector I feel obliged to respond. Your comments are premature at best, disrespect the consultation process DFO has undertaken, and are entirely dismissive of the legitimate concerns of an entire sector, including the official representation of that sector as defined in the Terms of Reference for the Salmon Allocation Policy review. Worse, you have eagerly aligned yourself with the narrative that anything less than complete agreement with the perspectives put forward by the other stakeholders in that process should be equated to colonialism, racism, and fear mongering.

This is deeply offensive, and deeply disappointing from an elected member of Parliament - regardless of party affiliation. Statements of apology have been issued for much less.

Pretty hard to shame the shameless but I applaud your efforts. Even if you don’t vote Conservative 😉
 
Agreed. He is so off the mark it is shocking. This whole "if you don't agree you're a racist" narrative is getting very frustrating. I felt compelled to tell him as much:

Hello MP Johns,

As a sport fisherman, and a former NDP voter I am seriously disappointed in your recent statements regarding the proposed changes to the Salmon Allocation Policy, and your willingness to paint any debate on the matter as racism and "fear mongering" perpetrated by Conservative MP's.

I am not a Conservative voter. I have never voted Conservative in my life. My concerns about the proposed SAP changes have nothing to do with what Conservative MP's have to say about it, and everything to do with supporting the position of the Sport Fishing Advisory Board - who were specifically included as a stakeholder in the Salmon Allocation Policy review process according to the Terms of Reference. I am also exercising my right to submit feedback to the public consultation process that closed on January 23rd, and like all members of the public was directly invited to do so by DFO. That an elected official (ie you) would go on record disputing and invalidating the perspective of the SFAB, as well as passing judgement on the concerns brought forward through the consultation process, implying they are based in racism and Conservative "fear mongering" is quite simply shameful. Why should the public place trust in the consultation process if - at least when it comes to the perspectives of the recreational sector - you clearly do not?

The fact is I have spoken to my MP about this, in person - who happens to be a Conservative. I didn't vote for her in the last election, but she is my elected representative so that is who I spoke to. She did not bring her perspective to me - I brought mine to HER. As did other constituents. If she and other Conservative MP's choose to take those concerns forward to Ottawa - well, isn't that how representation is supposed to work?

The fact also is that I have emailed YOU about this in the past, and you did not feel fit to register a response. In fact, I emailed every MP with a riding bordering the Pacific Ocean - regardless of party. Feel free to search your inbox for the subject "ATTENTION: Coastal BC MP's re changes to Salmon Allocation Policy". My email will be there. If you actually take the time to read it this time, I am confident you will see my concerns have absolutely no basis is "racism" and "fear mongering". Of all of the MP's on the Coast that I emailed, can you guess how many NDP, Green, or Liberals took the time to respond? Zero. The same number that took the time to attend the Town Hall in Duncan last weekend.

In your recent interview on Chek News, part of the explanation for your absence at this Town Hall was that Conservative MP's would be speaking at it. So what? Are you so biased to party lines that you could not deign to show your face in the same building as your colleagues from across the aisle? Does their mere presence render the concerns of everyone else in attendance unworthy of your time and consideration - including many citizens from your own riding? If you are so confident that mountains are being made out of mole holes - why don't you show up the next time and present a balanced counterpoint? If - as you assert - misinformation is being allowed to spread - why don't you engage directly with those concerned and explain your position? Make an honest attempt to explain why we should not be worried. And field those questions on the spot - not filtered through a sympathetic interviewer or carefully wordsmithed - yet somehow, still completely tone deaf - statement on your Facebook page.

I expect no response to this email. I expect you will say "not my riding, not my problem" - however your recent comments in the news media and your personal Facebook page were not just directed at your riding. They were directed at the recreational fishing sector at large, and as a member of that sector I feel obliged to respond. Your comments are premature at best, disrespect the consultation process DFO has undertaken, and are entirely dismissive of the legitimate concerns of an entire sector, including the official representation of that sector as defined in the Terms of Reference for the Salmon Allocation Policy review. Worse, you have eagerly aligned yourself with the narrative that anything less than complete agreement with the perspectives put forward by the other stakeholders in that process should be equated to colonialism, racism, and fear mongering.

This is deeply offensive, and deeply disappointing from an elected member of Parliament - regardless of party affiliation. Statements of apology have been issued for much less.
you should post this on his Facebook page.
 
Agreed. He is so off the mark it is shocking. This whole "if you don't agree you're a racist" narrative is getting very frustrating. I felt compelled to tell him as much:

Hello MP Johns,

As a sport fisherman, and a former NDP voter I am seriously disappointed in your recent statements regarding the proposed changes to the Salmon Allocation Policy, and your willingness to paint any debate on the matter as racism and "fear mongering" perpetrated by Conservative MP's.

I am not a Conservative voter. I have never voted Conservative in my life. My concerns about the proposed SAP changes have nothing to do with what Conservative MP's have to say about it, and everything to do with supporting the position of the Sport Fishing Advisory Board - who were specifically included as a stakeholder in the Salmon Allocation Policy review process according to the Terms of Reference. I am also exercising my right to submit feedback to the public consultation process that closed on January 23rd, and like all members of the public was directly invited to do so by DFO. That an elected official (ie you) would go on record disputing and invalidating the perspective of the SFAB, as well as passing judgement on the concerns brought forward through the consultation process, implying they are based in racism and Conservative "fear mongering" is quite simply shameful. Why should the public place trust in the consultation process if - at least when it comes to the perspectives of the recreational sector - you clearly do not?

The fact is I have spoken to my MP about this, in person - who happens to be a Conservative. I didn't vote for her in the last election, but she is my elected representative so that is who I spoke to. She did not bring her perspective to me - I brought mine to HER. As did other constituents. If she and other Conservative MP's choose to take those concerns forward to Ottawa - well, isn't that how representation is supposed to work?

The fact also is that I have emailed YOU about this in the past, and you did not feel fit to register a response. In fact, I emailed every MP with a riding bordering the Pacific Ocean - regardless of party. Feel free to search your inbox for the subject "ATTENTION: Coastal BC MP's re changes to Salmon Allocation Policy". My email will be there. If you actually take the time to read it this time, I am confident you will see my concerns have absolutely no basis is "racism" and "fear mongering". Of all of the MP's on the Coast that I emailed, can you guess how many NDP, Green, or Liberals took the time to respond? Zero. The same number that took the time to attend the Town Hall in Duncan last weekend.

In your recent interview on Chek News, part of the explanation for your absence at this Town Hall was that Conservative MP's would be speaking at it. So what? Are you so biased to party lines that you could not deign to show your face in the same building as your colleagues from across the aisle? Does their mere presence render the concerns of everyone else in attendance unworthy of your time and consideration - including many citizens from your own riding? If you are so confident that mountains are being made out of mole holes - why don't you show up the next time and present a balanced counterpoint? If - as you assert - misinformation is being allowed to spread - why don't you engage directly with those concerned and explain your position? Make an honest attempt to explain why we should not be worried. And field those questions on the spot - not filtered through a sympathetic interviewer or carefully wordsmithed - yet somehow, still completely tone deaf - statement on your Facebook page.

I expect no response to this email. I expect you will say "not my riding, not my problem" - however your recent comments in the news media and your personal Facebook page were not just directed at your riding. They were directed at the recreational fishing sector at large, and as a member of that sector I feel obliged to respond. Your comments are premature at best, disrespect the consultation process DFO has undertaken, and are entirely dismissive of the legitimate concerns of an entire sector, including the official representation of that sector as defined in the Terms of Reference for the Salmon Allocation Policy review. Worse, you have eagerly aligned yourself with the narrative that anything less than complete agreement with the perspectives put forward by the other stakeholders in that process should be equated to colonialism, racism, and fear mongering.

This is deeply offensive, and deeply disappointing from an elected member of Parliament - regardless of party affiliation. Statements of apology have been issued for much less.

👏 👏 👏 👏
 
So I did have a lengthy conversation with Gord Johns yesterday.

I wanted to get the firearms issue out of the way up front, and did. He noted the program was "a disaster" and that his Party has a few things in the works that he would relay shortly.

Then onto the Salmon Allocation Policy.

Gord tried to defend what he had written, and did stick to his guns saying that some Conservatives were being "inflammatory".
I did cover a lot of the points presented here and on the SFI website and he actually agreed with some.
He stated that no-one wants to see a cessation of the recreational fleet's access, and that would be maintained regardless of how things shake out.
I then noted the comments from here regarding the Salmon Festival which did seem to give him pause.
The same for Bamfield and Ukee considerations.

Gord went on to note that he and his team assisted the Sport Fishing Institute with drafting the petition to aid in developing salmon stocks in December:

PETITION TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS IN PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED

Petition to improve conservation rules for southern resident killer whales and amend associated fishing regulations
We, the undersigned residents of Canada, draw the attention of the House of Commons in Parliament Assembled to the following:

Whereas

Southern Resident Killer Whales (SRKWs) move freely throughout the Salish Sea and Pacific coast, regularly crossing the Canada–United States border, an artificial boundary for marine wildlife;

Recreational fishers and coastal communities faced fishing restrictions that have not been evaluated for effectiveness or demonstrate contribution to SRKW recovery, resulting in significant socio-economic harm;

Current management measures rely on fixed spatial-temporal measures that do not adaptively respond to prey availability or highly variable SRKW forage behaviour;

SRKW presence data demonstrates that they rarely utilize areas designated for salmon fishing closures;

Alignment with Washington State’s SRKW measures would improve avoidance practices for boaters and coordinate protection across shared waters;

Therefore, We, the undersigned, Citizens and Residents of Canada call upon the Government of Canada to:

1. Direct Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Transport Canada to align SRKW vessel operation measures with those of Washington State;

2. Adopt vessel operation rules that clearly address distance, speed and underwater noise reduction;

3. Implement 400m mobile avoidance zone without exemption for all small vessels year-round, and additionally requiring recreational fishers to cease fishing when Killer Whales’ appear, and where practicable, move slowly to 1,000 m distance;

4. Establish recovery objectives and performance metrics for all SRKW proposed measures;

5. Assess all salmon stock abundance, particularly Chinook and Chum, in high-use SRKW critical habitat, and transition to adaptive management measures based on stock abundance;

6. Repeal recreational fishing closures that lack measurable objective evidence of contributing to defined recovery benefits.

.................................................................................

He also noted he was the only MP to stand up and address the soon to be extinguished Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative:


I will be taking this matter up with both Clifford Small and Mel Arnold shortly.

He noted he will soon be meeting with Minister Thompson, and stated he would be bring my (our) concerns to the table.

Gord finished off by saying that "I can assure you that I will always stand up for the sport and recreation sector and for the continued ability of all Canadians to fish."

While the last seems out of line with what he wrote, I will reserve my judgment until after he gets back to me regarding the outcome of his meeting with the Minister.

Take this for what you will but I was somewhat encouraged that he was apparently not in ravenous support of the FN / Commercial proposals.

Cheers,
Nog
 
Thanks Nog for the up date.. I can say coming to Port Alberni & couple other location to be announced shortly with be a SAP BCW/ SFI town hall meeting and Gord will most definitely be invited :)

Forgot to mention that. Johns did note that he was given insufficient lead time (had other scheduling constraints) to attend that particular meeting. He also noted given who was going to be present from an opposing party, it felt like an ambush of sorts.
Get me as much lead time as possible regarding a Port Alberni meeting & I will press him to attend.

Cheers
 
Back
Top