John Duncan, MP - Health, sustainability of fishery must come first

Sushihunter

Active Member
http://www.canada.com/Health+sustainability+fishery+must+come+first/4144516/story.html

Health, sustainability of fishery must come first

By John Duncan, Courier-Islander January 21, 2011



In recent weeks there has been considerable discussion on the issue of halibut allocation. I would like to take this opportunity to clarify my position on this issue.

Concerned anglers want to ensure that they maintain their access to a public resource. As a recreational fisher, this is a position that I strongly support.

There have been many developments in recent years that have influenced the management of and pressures on BC's halibut stocks. For example, BC's commercial halibut fishery changed to 100 per cent monitoring using camera technology in 2006, and has become integrated with the ground fishery. The design of this fishery has ended bycatch waste and depoliticised the allocation of the resource within the commercial sector. At the same time, the commercial sector of the recreational halibut fishery (guides and lodges) has grown dramatically to become an important contributor to our economy, but has also increased pressure on the recreational allocation.

We are currently in a cyclical decline in Halibut abundance on the West Coast, to the point that the current total allowable catch is about half of what it was four years ago. This obviously puts pressure on all users of the resource as they try to maintain their livelihoods and recreational pursuits in the face of decreasing catch. In response to this, it is understandable that people are focusing on who gets access to the fish.

The key concern that we must focus on, however, is the sustainability of the resource. Management of this fishery, including allocation decisions, should be based on science, thorough monitoring and good management principles. There are many examples historically to demonstrate that decisions based on politics rather than science rarely yield the best result for the fishery.

A lasting and equitable solution will require all of the parties to work together in good faith and with the best interest of the resource in mind. Our primary concern must remain the health and sustainability of the fishery, and any change must provide a fair balance between the unique West Coast requirements of the First Nation, recreation and commercial sectors.

John Duncan
North Island MP

© Copyright (c) Postmedia News
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Duncan just doesn't get it, does he. Once again, this is not about conservation -
it is about a wrong political allocation decision. Is the gaff for use on Mr. Duncan?
 
He is just saying the same thing he said a few days ago. Keep phoning his office. His press release is not acceptable, or adequate to the people in his constitiuency. I phoned his office and asked for a meeting, only got voicemail.
 
Looks to me like this article was written from his press release from the other day. It is nothing new, and not the "new" press release that was promised for Friday the 21st.

I checked his website and there is nothing about Halibut on there at all. No "news" since mid-December of 2010.
 
Interesting how Mr.Duncan brings up 'Catch Monitoring"-How's that has anything to do with 436 guys getting 88% and we get 12%?

Lodge & guides are" Taxi Cabs" they are not catching the fish-Large percentage of the individual's are Tax paying Canadians-

The recreational sector has been fully supported better catch monitoring via catch Monitoring pilots and E-Log projects with DFO.
The main point is that for 87 years we have entrusted the halibut biomass to the IPHC and that has worked very well.
Our reporting is acceptable to the IPHC...thats the bottem line! It is time tested and has been used to provide what appears to be a solid science.

The commercial sector was quite happy to lease us quota when were over our 12%, they trusted the catch monitoring system when they were leasing us quota.
 
Duncan is more than just an MP, he's a Cabinet Minister. In that regard, you can be sure that his press release was vetted by the PMO just to be sure there aren't mixed messages going out. That tells me there won't be responses from others in Cabinet that are much different from his.
 
Absolutely right-- His office writes it, he checks it. Its send to Gail Shea and the PMO. and then the Communications Division fans it out.
 
Back
Top