Dinnertime
Member
Active pass closed? WTF?
About 8 months ago I told a retired dfo biologist about the SRKW restrictions proposed and the possibility of further restrictions around chinook for the SOG and JDF.
His response was " oh their finally going to do that." Their is some management decisions that have been sitting on ottawa's desk since the harper government got voted in now what all most 15 years ago?
The second thing is DFO gets its budget from Ottawa. When the Finance minister and Trudeau are going over the budget they say hmmm what's the best chance of getting re elected. Giving money to DFO has never been that high on Ottawa's list.
Harper favored keeping commercial and recreational fisheries open, The Liberals favors letting first nations fish and the environment. ITs always been like this
Despite all the great work that hunters and fishermen do for the enviorment, we will always be perceived by thoes in ottawa is being a primarily right leaning voting base.
Also then there's the Budget divide within DFO. WHO gets more money east coast fisheries or West coast fisheries. Well guess what pretty much the whole maritimes voted for a liberal government
View attachment 38174
And they are allowed one salmon PER SEASON
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/salmon-fishery-regulations-nl-1.4652459
It’s all closedCan't make heads or tails of the closures around the mouth of the Fraser. In lay mans terms- coal port closed? Pt grey bell bouy closed? West of sand heads open? Thanx
Not so much ironic as indicative that DFO had no idea what it was doing. I bet those fish were all caught legally, the fishers were in full compliance with regulations promulgated by DFO for that period. In fact,by my count there are 16 fishermen and about 30 fish.While I agree showing this shot was a poor choice it also draws attention to the decades of mismanagement and is still done to this day to by lodges to solicit customers.Its good there are letter writing activities going on, but I do find it a bit ironic showing a picture as part of the argument that is indicative of the excess retention of big chinook salmon we as sport fisherman (and our predecessors) participated in that contributed to the species decline. It looks like there are over 30 mostly large chinook in this one picture. This seems to be evidence of where some of that missing Nahmint run went.
Its good there are letter writing activities going on, but I do find it a bit ironic showing a picture as part of the argument that is indicative of the excess retention of big chinook salmon we as sport fisherman (and our predecessors) participated in that contributed to the species decline. It looks like there are over 30 mostly large chinook in this one picture. This seems to be evidence of where some of that missing Nahmint run went.
Not so much ironic as indicative that DFO had no idea what it was doing. I bet those fish were all caught legally, the fishers were in full compliance with regulations promulgated by DFO for that period. In fact,by my count there are 16 fishermen and about 30 fish.While I agree showing this shot was a poor choice it also draws attention to the decades of mismanagement and is still done to this day to by lodges to solicit customers.
Take it from someone who has fished the Nahmint River, this once great run of large Chinook Salmon was not fished out by sport fishermen, but by the large commercial Seiners!!!
And the limit back then was 8 chinook per fishermen per day, a limit I might add that was seldom exploited by Sport Fishermen and there were only a small fraction of the number of fishermen that exist today and without the use of downriggers and depth sounders. No bait fish was used, only spoons and plugs.
Wonder if Trudeau’s Grsndfather was the Minister when this photo was taken? Generations of bad management I guess.
Just search the areas you want to know about and you can get the updated regs first hand http://notices.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/fns-sap/index-eng.cfmSooke closed too now? WTF?
Bloody sad..... so who is to blame ? Not loss of habitat in AK. Previous over fishing ? Possible. How about a shift in ocean productivity and over production.. possible. But I do know that a biologist sitting behind a computer can only do so much and that MUCH more immediate research is needed.