Hi all,
I will preface this with the statement that I am a complete novice in all things boating.
I have read several threads here and elsewhere detailing I/O conversions. The standard being to pod the boat. I have also seen a handful of threads where an IO conversion was achieved through cutting down the transom, strengthening it, putting the OB on the strengthened transom, and then having a well where the old inboard was.
Now the obvious disadvantage of the second option is that you do not gain any deck space, however for the average builder this would appear to be a far safer / easier conversion for 2 reasons, 1 there is no need to engineer the pod (some horrible diy versions are online which have had massive failures) and secondly the weight distribution on the boat would not change nearly as much as it would with a pod.
Please help a novice in understanding why more people do not opt for the transom I/O conversion on smaller boats in the 16-20 range, is it as simple as the deck space issue?
I will preface this with the statement that I am a complete novice in all things boating.
I have read several threads here and elsewhere detailing I/O conversions. The standard being to pod the boat. I have also seen a handful of threads where an IO conversion was achieved through cutting down the transom, strengthening it, putting the OB on the strengthened transom, and then having a well where the old inboard was.
Now the obvious disadvantage of the second option is that you do not gain any deck space, however for the average builder this would appear to be a far safer / easier conversion for 2 reasons, 1 there is no need to engineer the pod (some horrible diy versions are online which have had massive failures) and secondly the weight distribution on the boat would not change nearly as much as it would with a pod.
Please help a novice in understanding why more people do not opt for the transom I/O conversion on smaller boats in the 16-20 range, is it as simple as the deck space issue?