Just like NGO science can ignore factual field ecology status eh.https://vancouversun.com/opinion/op...are-easy-scapegoats-in-chinook-salmon-decline
Harbour seals are easy scapegoats in Chinook salmon decline
Goes on to say....
“But, hold on a minute — there has been virtually no change in seal numbers in B.C. in more than 20 years
"Other studies show only four per cent of the harbour seal diet is salmon; that herring and hake are their primary prey. In fact, 40 per cent of the harbour seal diet is hake, which is a major salmon smolt predator. While appealing to some, a seal cull could actually destabilize the coastal food web, result in an increased abundance of hake, and increase the predation of juvenile salmon by hake.”
Could a fooled me cause my observation and reports I have read say there has been a huge increase in the Seal and Sea Lion population in the last 20 years and the skill of these brown eyed devils taking Chinook salmon right off my line often running them into kelp beds or over reefs is improving each year.
As far as the hake argument goes, I know there are sometimes tons of hake taken commercially off shore, but only a few show up where I do all my fishing and I might add back when you could fish in the river mouths I NEVER once caught a hake. Hey Dave...do you ever catch hake in Tyee Pool??
It's kinda like saying SVI Resident Orca's only eat big fat Fraser River Chinook proven by the fact that this is what they found when they picked up the whale scat. The fact the scat was picked up in the approaches of the Fraser River might have something to do with it...wonder what they eat the other 10 months of the year???
But what do I know, I am not a scientist...I have only been on the water fishing and observing all this stuff for over 60 years. Some science just defies logic. Anyone any time can get science to support their cause....just look at Fish Farms...eh
Yay a pro NGO article that offers no solution.
and that's not why they have the Harp seal hunt, neither. .
That's kind of the point of the article, that there isn't a simple minded "solution" needed. A female Chinook lays about 5,000 eggs. Technically 2 need to return, the rest get eaten by something and there are a multitude of reasons why that is not been happening. Mindless interventions targeting one part of complex ecosystems rarely turn out well. The seal population is being contained by the food supply (which is mainly hake and herring) and predation by Biggs whales. Seals were blamed on the east coast for the cod collapse too when it was clearly man made, and somehow cod populations are rebounding despite northern harp seal populations rebounding .
It's called a welcome mat ..........I can recall being a kid and finding a stash of magazines that looked like they were wearing fur underwear...... So much fur...
"Other studies show only four per cent of the harbour seal diet is salmon; that herring and hake are their primary prey. In fact, 40 per cent of the harbour seal diet is hake, which is a major salmon smolt predator. While appealing to some, a seal cull could actually destabilize the coastal food web, result in an increased abundance of hake, and increase the predation of juvenile salmon by hake.”
Here I was reading this getting all excited that the Salish Sea was just packed full of Hake and I could fish up some like the seals do....
Oh wait.... I know correlation does not equal causation but hmm look at thoes post 1970 numbers...
View attachment 39275
View attachment 39276
Are you saying there are few hake in the Southern VI waters I fish eating our salmon smolts???
Or no one is fishing for them?
Could this be another false accusation in the story I posted on?
Or am I missing something