SpringVelocity
Crew Member
All I'm saying is there is something very, very wrong with the catch reporting. I believe you when you say there is no way we caught 900 fish in Area 19 in the month of June, unfortunately DFO's numbers do not agree. Their numbers are what matters.
I keep hearing the word "accountability" and lets "fight for more TAC". Some of the answers rest in our hands....Log Books gents. If you completed Log Books, those catch numbers in June would be different. Until we get on that program, the numbers won't change. I'm not blaming the creel people either. I have seen how the errors happen so easily in a big marina. The surveyor can't be everywhere, so they hang out at the cleaning tables.
The only reason I used the Area 19 example is it was the most obvious one where we know there is a problem - it is obvious, but so too is the solution which is clearly in our control if we want to bother doing log books. So don't get pissed off, understand the point being made and do something about it.
Oh ya, I do come down and Fish Area 19...see you in a few weeks.
Yes it needs to get looked at because June - August there is minimal effort down here. It can only be done in short windows, and dogfish are insane. This is question is it possible with the looming reductions next year that one size fits all model on the coast won't work? I thought about this last night but I remembered being told it was too hard to do. Maybe it is something to explore moving forward? Again I don't know the process with the data.