got horses,, how about 557?
- Thread starter trophywife
- Start date
Fish-Hunter
Active Member
Nice looking units.
listed in benefits of V-8 engine - "fuel efficient" (that must be a relative term
)
6.2 litres 557 HP that thing is going to drink some fuel for sure.
Maintenance may be a bit of a problem for a while - Mechanical technicians that come to you they say, now that sounds expensive to me no doubt.
Well if you have the money, why not, I bet they will go fast.
Just waiting to see someone put up on the net a video of some guy that has put four of these on the back of his boat LOL.
(someone will do it!)
listed in benefits of V-8 engine - "fuel efficient" (that must be a relative term
)6.2 litres 557 HP that thing is going to drink some fuel for sure.
Maintenance may be a bit of a problem for a while - Mechanical technicians that come to you they say, now that sounds expensive to me no doubt.
Well if you have the money, why not, I bet they will go fast.
Just waiting to see someone put up on the net a video of some guy that has put four of these on the back of his boat LOL.
(someone will do it!)
Lipripper
Active Member
Nice looking units.
listed in benefits of V-8 engine - "fuel efficient" (that must be a relative term
6.2 litres 557 HP that thing is going to drink some fuel for sure.
A relative term for sure...... Gas + air = HP.......... Bet you that it would burn less(on a level playing field) than the 5.2l in my durange-o at under 300hp
Will go a step further and say that that 557 burns less fuel than my merc 188 with a 300 cfm 2 barrel
spring time
Well-Known Member
I wonder the weight of them
sammyslabber
Active Member
1000lbs. ea.
Similar threads
