OldBlackDog
Well-Known Member
So, you are saying a possibly 1to 2% mortality could be attribulated from fish farms, sea lice, diseases etc.?
So, page after page for a possible 1% and this is where we should be spending our efforts?
So, page after page for a possible 1% and this is where we should be spending our efforts?
We've had this discussion numerous times, Whitebuck - on this and other threads.
There are numerous impacts on wild stocks - but when the ocean survival rate is in the tank - an additional 1-2% of mortality (from fish farms, sea lice, diseases, etc - or anything else) means the difference between low but stable stock trajectories and numbers dropping precipitously - which we have seen. We can't do much wrt management actions for the drop in ocean survival - except reduce fishing pressure - which has been done. The open net-cage technology is another management action we can affect - but largely HAVE NOT ADDRESSED.
Let me put it back on you Whitebuck - how do you rationalize your assertion that spending time on the Skeena will magically change the fish farm debate?