MRWood
Well-Known Member
Bobby Orr comes to mind….there, I said itOne of their best efforts , i guess Miller is really the straw that stirs the drink ... , watching Hughes play is something else , he's like the McDavid of Dmen , ya i said it

Bobby Orr comes to mind….there, I said itOne of their best efforts , i guess Miller is really the straw that stirs the drink ... , watching Hughes play is something else , he's like the McDavid of Dmen , ya i said it
Embarrassing this dump and change is killing any momentum, the flu bug, EP40 plus 4 or 5 others and 4 defensemen playing above their pay grade is a telling story. Islanders, Devils and now the Bruins at home, it’s so easy pinch at the blue line and an easy win against a team that refuses to use the middle of the ice. Speed kills.
I've never played the game so I need some education here. Why would dump and chase be a standard mode of play? In most team sports, ball possession is critical, control that and you'll probably win. Yes, there are exceptions, such as the chip and chase in rugby, but these are calculated tactical moves made when the situation appears ripe for exploitation.They have always been a dump and chase team, never has worked and never will you have to adapt and change on the fly but I don’t think they can.. old habits die hard
It is often used if the D corp of the opposing team is on the smaller side. Dump it in and play physical on the end boards. Keeps them looking over their shoulders. I can't say that it is a good strategy to use for and entire game though.I've never played the game so I need some education here. Why would dump and chase be a standard mode of play? In most team sports, ball possession is critical, control that and you'll probably win. Yes, there are exceptions, such as the chip and chase in rugby, but these are calculated tactical moves made when the situation appears ripe for exploitation.
In hockey, I understand the dump and chase by a single player to permit a shift change, but as a normal attacking team strategy? Never understood this. Someone explain for me please.
Also used when the defencsive team is standing up at the blueline and the offensive team has less skilled players to beat the blueline defense.It is often used if the D corp of the opposing team is on the smaller side. Dump it in and play physical on the end boards. Keeps them looking over their shoulders. I can't say that it is a good strategy to use for and entire game though.
The 3 conference games in 4 nights, Colorado, Utah and Vegas and their outcomes will most likely be a telling story. The defence is a mess after Hughes and with multiple players in slumps it should get interesting to watch management pick up the pieces. Who knows, maybe Miller to NYR or maybe its big bucks EP40 whose receiving a lot of negative press with his inconsistent play. Rumours were it just about materialized with Carolina in the off season. Buffalo is ripe and Canucks management is not one to sit around thinking about it. I will give them credit for that. Speculation is interesting that’s for sure. Maybe it’s Tocchet.I've heard some interesting rumors recently. People "connected with the team". Sounds like there will be a bit of a shake-up coming. Hard to believe what I'm hearing, but I'll be interested to see if it's true.
I would be all over that speculative trade suggested by Friedman.The 3 conference games in 4 nights, Colorado, Utah and Vegas and their outcomes will most likely be a telling story. The defence is a mess after Hughes and with multiple players in slumps it should get interesting to watch management pick up the pieces. Who knows, maybe Miller to NYR or maybe its big bucks EP40 whose receiving a lot of negative press with his inconsistent play. Rumours were it just about materialized with Carolina in the off season. Buffalo is ripe and Canucks management is not one to sit around thinking about it. I will give the credit for that. Speculation is interesting that’s for sure. Maybe it’s Tocchet.
Please fill us in......I've heard some interesting rumors recently. People "connected with the team". Sounds like there will be a bit of a shake-up coming. Hard to believe what I'm hearing, but I'll be interested to see if it's true.
Don’t you love speculation with this crazy province.I would be all over that speculative trade suggested by Friedman.
Bryan and Cuzins for Pettersen. They save some cap space as a bonus
Getting out from that contract for #40 is paramount. If a player( Byram) is out for injury he doesn’t count on the cap. The nhl is all about performance vs salary cap percentageDon’t you love speculation with this crazy province.
Bryam and Cuzens for EP40 not for me. It starts with Owen Powers and goes from there. Bryam is one concussion away from a career. OPowers and Thompson I would be all over that. LOL Buffalo says no.