S
Stephen Kowalski
Guest
Yep - couldn't have said it better. AA is correct on his theory, so good for him. I gave him a hard time for over playing it but looks like something more was afoot! But, shutting down all the FF's (whether I like them or not) may have zero impact on our wild salmon runs. That's what I am worried about. If we go after only one of the causes and that cause is minimal, then what? I asked what is plan B? I was surprised to read about the ph levels and how it effects the underlying ecology of salmon rearing streams. This sounds similar to my concern that Alaskan salmon ranching will cause a collapse in the food sources for all of our salmon. So, is it climate change, habitat destruction, Fish Farm's, salmon ranching? We need a way to figure out what is worse or should we go after them all? Also, we need to be prepared to put our money where our mouths are! If we shut don the FF's, we need to pay them for there loss of investment. This is common in our society. Ask Kathleen Wynn how it worked out when she got it wrong.... We paid...not her.Farming Atlantic salmon in the east is not good for a host of reason.
Just like farming pacific salmon on this coast would be and something I’m against.
Having fish farms on land is the safest approach there is no debating that.
What I find personally frustrating is the amount of weighting some here put on salmon farms and there responsibility in causing salmon stocks to crash. Also I find frustrating the anti fish farming Lobby tends to attack farms more then other issues salmon face.
A developer can completely build right over a salmon stream killing it for ever and no seems to care. Cities can extract Rock form salmon beds and it barley makes the news. A contractor can leak cement and silt in to a stream where salmon are spawning and is business as normal.
The type of over-site lacking in fish farms is also the type of over-site lacking in all these other issues.