No matter what, we can't ignore the actual hard facts. Not even if you are an ENGO leaning person. Hard facts on the SRKW is not that difficult to visualize in a timeline.
Facts
Previous to taking the first documented whale, there was commercial whaling.
Previous to the 1964 whale taken for captivity for the vancouver aquarium, there was no real scientific data on how many whales total, how many in each pod, what the age and sex were, or anything really. Just little blips of documentation.
During the captivity captures, there was no documentation of how many were killed in the process.
Once the captures were outlawed. There has been more studies and documentation following the pods, naming the whales and determining their age and sex, as well as total counts of these populations.
They took the smaller whales once the companies realized it was a better investment.
The SRKW has inbreed to an extent that science doesn't have all the answers to.
Those whales are the best fisherman in the ocean along side our salmon is plentiful enough to support them.
They don't just eat Chinook salmon.
Recreation angling is not preventing these whales from feeding.
These are just the bullet points of the timeline I put together when I researched the documentation. Whatever is avaiable. Articles, interview videos, documentaries and documented scientific research.
My own OP
I'll bet there's not a scientist in the world who could sign off on the 100 year or another 2 generations outcome of how these populations will pan out, even if they had " chinook" salmon every day for the next 100 years
I'm with
@fish brain. Except ill raise you one. Can someone put a timelime or somthing explaining the actual numbers of fish? Including enhancement, clip or no clip, all regions around the SOG south of nanaimo "including Howe Sound" and all the way around to Barkley sound, then include all of Washington, Oregon and Northern California, for the last 5 years?
Our DFO should be doing that