You guys make me laugh why does it bother you soo much sounds like a bit of jealousy to me there is 46 KMS of shoreline they took away if someone choses to go into it by 50 feet BIG DEAL!!!!! it really isnt the end of the world seriously, if it "offends you" so much dont fish there stay away. the one you should be angry at is DFO and there stupid ways for doing something, that was to kill sooke fishery along with pender and other areas VENT it on them and no one else they are the ones who have completely screwed this up....
Rant done
As for fishing sooke sockeye are tough right now, springs have been good one day slow the next we are getting close to staging time with springs so your going to get some more aggressive hits etc , best advice I can give you use thicker leaders and check them ofton as these teeth are getting sharp now got a mle 20 lber today and he already had a kipe and nasty teeth....WEEDS are horrid in am FYI now go back to fishing and enjoy yourselfs as im sure we wont be soon enough the way things are going!!!!!
Good luck Wolf
I cannot agree with your criticism of Englishman’s point (shared by others) about the rules. The rules apply to all and no one is entitled to say they apply to everyone else but not me. To simply say it is not a “big deal” is completely wrong. It means people can ignore the rules on the basis that it has no impact on the resource. But if everyone takes this view, then the rule effectively ceases to exist, and the resource is harmed. But more importantly, respect for, and ultimately adherence to, the rule of law, is eroded. This, in turn, leads to the chaos and anarchy of which Englishman speaks.
It’s such an insidiously wrong way to think. Today, it’s a few boats, a few feet over the line. Tomorrow, encouraged by comments like yours, it will be 50 boats. And because it’s not a “big deal”, a few feet becomes a few miles. And because, just as the police can’t be everywhere and neither can the enforcement arm of DFO, the rules keep getting ignored because the risk of apprehension is so small.
It’s so easy to say it’s not a “big deal” with respect to almost all the rules. Barbed hooks, size limits, catch number and species limits etc. Each angler so inclined justifies their infringement by saying things like “it’s not going to make a difference”, “it’s only one fish”, “it’s a fraction of inch under (or over)”. Of course if one angler can exempt himself from the rules, they all can. And ultimately the rule, which was designed and legislated to protect the resource, is ignored and the resource is imperiled.
But thankfully the honour system upon which these rules depend is followed by many, I would like to think most, anglers. They follow the rules to respect the resource and the rule of law. They express their concerns about or disagreements with the rules not by breaking them, but by seeking to change then through the accepted, established and democratic means by which laws are enacted, changed and repealed.
I am sorry, but there is no room for dangerous arguments like “it’s no big deal” if we want to respect the resource and the rule of law.