searun
Well-Known Member
I would add that the SFAB will be holding special SFAC meetings in those areas impacted by the proposed management measures to gather in local knowledge holder expertise. Those inputs will be summarized and shared, so folks wishing to see the SFAB response and then complete the survey are welcome to do that. The SFAB meetings will be next week, so the summary document will be available week of Feb 21. The survey is open for comment until March 2.
Please note that within the survey there are 24 questions, and many allow for additional comment within dialogue boxes that drop down after you select an answer. If the option you are providing comment on doesn't fit your expert views on areas of high SRKW foraging, you can offer alternatives.
The comment sections will of course be of utmost value and interest to DFO.
Strongly encourage additional comments related to ways we could improve upon the protective efficacy of the 400m bubble and 1000m voluntary fishery avoidance. In addition to that, the SFAB proposed to DFO that adaptive management measures such as monitoring some select areas for actual presence of SRKW before enacting fishery restrictions. This was done in 2021, and by all reports was successful. The 2021 approach was to allow the area to be open until detection of SRKW, then closed - not reopened. Under potential consideration are mechanisms to also re-open fisheries if SRKW are not continuing to be present within a sanctuary area. These are adaptive management measures the SFAB feels help achieve a balance between protecting whales, while allowing responsible on water activities such as fishing. If you agree or value those adaptive approaches, please comment.
Also important to note that one of the key areas of the Minister's mandate letter was to work with communities to support the blue economy - feel free to provide commentary on how the recreational fishery contributes to local jobs, economies, social and cultural well-being of coastal communities.
From Minister's Mandate Letter:
Thanks all who contribute to the survey - its your fishery, have your say.
Please note that within the survey there are 24 questions, and many allow for additional comment within dialogue boxes that drop down after you select an answer. If the option you are providing comment on doesn't fit your expert views on areas of high SRKW foraging, you can offer alternatives.
The comment sections will of course be of utmost value and interest to DFO.
Strongly encourage additional comments related to ways we could improve upon the protective efficacy of the 400m bubble and 1000m voluntary fishery avoidance. In addition to that, the SFAB proposed to DFO that adaptive management measures such as monitoring some select areas for actual presence of SRKW before enacting fishery restrictions. This was done in 2021, and by all reports was successful. The 2021 approach was to allow the area to be open until detection of SRKW, then closed - not reopened. Under potential consideration are mechanisms to also re-open fisheries if SRKW are not continuing to be present within a sanctuary area. These are adaptive management measures the SFAB feels help achieve a balance between protecting whales, while allowing responsible on water activities such as fishing. If you agree or value those adaptive approaches, please comment.
Also important to note that one of the key areas of the Minister's mandate letter was to work with communities to support the blue economy - feel free to provide commentary on how the recreational fishery contributes to local jobs, economies, social and cultural well-being of coastal communities.
From Minister's Mandate Letter:
- Continue working with business, academic institutions, non-profits, provincial and territorial governments, and Indigenous partners to grow Canada’s ocean and freshwater economy and support the long-term sustainable growth of Canada’s fish and seafood sector, ensuring Canada is positioned to succeed in the fast-growing global ocean sectors of the blue economy and advancing reconciliation, conservation and climate objectives.
Thanks all who contribute to the survey - its your fishery, have your say.