I had the telephone conversation with Rachel Blaney today. She basically asked me to make all of the points I wanted to, and she would try to act on them.
First off, I pointed out that the saltwater portion of the REC. fishery contributes about $700 million to the provincial economy. ($ 400 million freshwater, for a total of 1.1 billion) Of that about $400-500 million is recruited from the Johnstone and Georgia Strait fisheries. We talked about the potential loss of jobs. We talked about how little the impact of the southern B.C. sport fishery has on endangered Fraser Chinook. I pointed out that the cumulative encounters of upper Fraser Chinook, up until the in-river fishery is very low. ( gotta tip toe here, as her husband is elected chief of the Homalco band). We talked about hatcheries, and a selective mark fishery, and how even if we started marking fish next spring, it would be 4 years until we saw any selective mark fish. We talked about Habitat, and that it would be years before improvements made a difference. We talked about all of the fisheries on the stocks of concern, and I pointed out that the upper river FSC fishery had the highest exploitation rate. Lastley we talked about enforcement, about the 140 extra D.F.O. enforcement officers promised for the Fraser. Don't want to get anybody in trouble here, but one of the local enforcement officers said to me " 140 more officers for the Fraser? We don't have an extra 140 officers available in all of Canada"!
I should point out that the habitat that Rachel Blaney and I talked about is in the Thompson-Nicola region, where there has been accelerated harvest of pine beetle wood resulting in less shady area retaining snow pack, agricultural water extraction, sedimentation due to wildfire ash, faster run-off from the decreased ground cover. Low flows during the summer and fall, warmer water temperatures because of that. I did not talk about Vancouver Island other than to mention that most Chinook populations that are enhanced are producing a fair number of un-marked hatchery fish, and we need to start marking them asap. If we don't move to a mark selective fishery on Chinook, we may be looking at multiple years of non-retention until the upper Fraser fish have made it to the river.Thanks for this but I don't think she has a clue about the issues still. The issues is not habitat and restoration on North Vancouver island or hatcheries on Vancouver island. The issue is 1000km away and 100km up the Fraser River and the politics that resulted in the North Island getting closed. The message from her should be the north island fishery takes almost no fraser river stocks of concern WTF are we closed. Instead she is almost repeted the
ENGO line Habitat everywhere is falling we must do something.
“So far, we’ve heard clearly from multiple sectors that the concerns are around habitat restoration, and that has been underfunded for more than 15 years,” said Blaney. “There’s a great desire to see more resources given to habitat restoration.”
“What I want to see is a strong, bold plan that this government is going to put together to support the people, however they are impacted in this area,” said Blaney. “I want to make sure we receive funding to do things like building up our small, local hatcheries, making sure we have restoration in our creeks, streams and rivers, so we don’t have to face this in the long term.”
North Island-Powell River MP prepares report on state of chinook fishery
https://www.prpeak.com/news/north-i...report-on-state-of-chinook-fishery-1.23816387
I should point out that the habitat that Rachel Blaney and I talked about is in the Thompson-Nicola region, where there has been accelerated harvest of pine beetle wood resulting in less shady area retaining snow pack, agricultural water extraction, sedimentation due to wildfire ash, faster run-off from the decreased ground cover. Low flows during the summer and fall, warmer water temperatures because of that. I did not talk about Vancouver Island other than to mention that most Chinook populations that are enhanced are producing a fair number of un-marked hatchery fish, and we need to start marking them asap. If we don't move to a mark selective fishery on Chinook, we may be looking at multiple years of non-retention until the upper Fraser fish have made it to the river.
Do these totals reflect the unmonitored in river net fisheries that end up in the Black Market?Those are not the reason why the north island fishery is closed tho, There is no good reason why it should be closed. The Jonson strait fishery is closed over a stock that is not even caught in the Johnston Straight early upper Fraser Chinook.
Why close a fishery that has no impact on that stock? Its political, its optics for First Nations on the Fraser River. NBC and JS sport .05% and .30%.
View attachment 45331
No argument here, it was a backroom deal for sure. But.. habitat degradation in the Thompson -Nicola has contributed to the poor returns, and unless something is done about it, this will never change. I know the Johnstone/Georgia Strait fisheries have an extremely low encounter rate. .7%. We got screwed because of politics, not for the impact we're having on the stocks of concern.Those are not the reason why the north island fishery is closed tho, There is no good reason why it should be closed. The Jonson strait fishery is closed over a stock that is not even caught in the Johnston Straight early upper Fraser Chinook.
Why close a fishery that has no impact on that stock? Its political, its optics for First Nations on the Fraser River. NBC and JS sport .05% and .30%.
View attachment 45331
Probably not. The elephant in the room.Do these totals reflect the unmonitored in river net fisheries that end up in the Black Market?
Do these totals reflect the unmonitored in river net fisheries that end up in the Black Market?
habitat degradation in the Thompson -Nicola has contributed to the poor returns
DFO has an internal estimate but they are not publicly shared or in any results. The Bio's apparently take it into consideration but its not included in any reports made public.
Has it? or are the spawners just getting caught in nets in river?
There is no such thing as not making it public unless it falls under cabinet privilege, privacy laws or other protective legislation, but that kind of data should not fall under any and assuming it exist one would think it would be subject to a Freedom of Information Request even if for political reasons they would like to keep it internal.
Then go get it, make the request, First Nations make Freedom of information requisitions to DFO all the time
Your the one who raised the issue about its existence, if you want it request it yourself.
If the money laundering in B.C. is any example its a lot higher than they are estimating. Only way to stop it is to have DFO monitors on all in river net fisheries.There wouldn't be any hard numbers on black market fish. How could there be? Estimates would be as good as we could get
Except that there are no bodies to enforce that. 140 extra enforcement officers on the Fraser this spring and summer? Not a chance. political ********. I'm friends with one of the local DFO enforcement officers here in Campbell River. He says, 140 extra officers? There are not that many extra officers in all of Canada!If the money laundering in B.C. is any example its a lot higher than they are estimating. Only way to stop it is to have DFO monitors on all in river net fisheries.