Trudeau promises more gun control and goes on the attack against Scheer

Researched Numbers based Estimate number of prohibited firearms for ASFCP​

It has the best defended estimate for the number of OIC prohibited affected guns that I've seen -- 673,582 to 1,004,312 -- in the PDF pages 53-61.

The PDF is an interesting, albeit 93 page long, well sourced point of view on the cost benefit:
i) cost: crime will go up, including homicides, because it will consume police time for the next 50 years
ii) benefit: none.

And the last 2 pages are pictures of Canadians legally using Liberal prohibited guns for for hunting and sporting purposes.


The government never intended to pay for the vast majority of these firearms.
Smoke, mirrors and blatant lies.
 
Apr 2, 2026 CCFR Radio Podcast
Buyback update and how to withdraw from it. Provost unhinged, humiliates Liberals. Poly spreads more disinformation. Supreme Court schedule revealed, what’s next? New gun control study released. Liberal confiscation failing, massively! All this and more.

 

‘Keep Canadians safe from gun violence’: Ottawa defends federal firearms legislation​

In response to two York Region experts alarmed about federal firearms legislation, Ottawa insists it is making Canada safer.

Last month, Andre Milne and Mark Neprily raised concerns in a yorkregion.com article, saying the legislation threatens Canada’s national defence capabilities and tramples the rights of legal gun owners.

Schomberg’s Milne is the founder of military technology development company, Unicorn Aerospace, and Neprily is vice-president and chief operation officer of Cesaroni Technology in Gormley, which designs and manufactures specialized technology for the aerospace and defence industries.

They feel the federal government is duping Canadians into thinking the public is going to be safer by removing firearms from lawful owners when, they argue, criminals will continue to stockpile guns.

Under federal legislation, businesses and individual firearm owners must safely dispose of or permanently deactivate their assault-style firearms before the amnesty period ends on Oct. 30, or risk potential criminal charges.

Milne and Neprily maintain federal legislation violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms by ignoring a grandfather clause in the Firearms Act, threatening lawful firearms owners with arrest and prosecution for keeping guns they are legally allowed to have.

They also said Unicorn is unable to do any 50-calibre testing, which prevents Cesaroni from helping Unicorn develop a mobile tactical anti-nuclear missile defence system.

That puts Canada’s military capabilities at risk, they said.

That’s not how Public Safety Canada sees it, although Milne continues to find fault with the government’s position, even going as far as calling it “creepy.”

The legislation is part of the Canadian government’s “comprehensive plan to strengthen gun control in Canada and keep Canadians safe from gun violence,” government spokesperson, Tim Warmington, said in an email.

The legislation did not create or include any provisions that would impact the existing grandfathering privileges for individuals in possession of certain prohibited firearms, he said.

Additionally, businesses registered under the Defence Production Act, or operating under the authority of the Canadian Forces, are not hampered by the legislation, Warmington said.

The government introduced Bill C-21 following Canada’s deadliest mass shooting, which left 22 people in Nova Scotia on April 18 and 19, 2020.

Passed into law on Dec. 15, 2023, the legislation aims to tighten gun control through a freeze on handguns and a crackdown on assault-style firearms.

“This approach (to address firearms violence and combat crime) includes the prohibition of assault-style firearms and their removal from Canadian communities, investing in border security and law enforcement capacity to reduce firearms smuggling and trafficking, addressing firearms violence, and supporting intervention and prevention programs addressing gun and gang violence,” Warmington said.

Ottawa has banned about 2,500 makes and models of assault-style firearms (ASF) since May 2020.

These firearms share common technical characteristics, namely semi-automatic action with sustained rapid-fire capability that make them unsuitable for civilian use, Warmington said.

“They can inflict significant harm and can increase the severity of mass shootings,” he said.

Also prohibited are grenade launcher- and sniper rifle-type weapons, Warmington said.

“These weapons are primarily designed to produce mass human casualties or cause significant property damage at long ranges,” he said.

Before the amnesty period ends on Oct. 30, affected gun owners have several options to comply with the law, Warmington said.

“Grandfathering is not an option for these ASFs as there is no legal mechanism in place under the Firearms Act to permit their continued possession after the end of the amnesty period,” he said.

“The intent is to reduce the number and availability of ASFs in Canadian communities, and to reduce the possibility of these firearms being diverted to the illegal market.”

Milne remains unswayed by the government’s stand.

“Aside from (the legislation) restricting Unicorn Aerospace from testing 50-caliber prototypes as part of developing a much larger anti-ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) Air Defense System, the creepy fact the Canadian government just casually betrayed a legally binding promise to provide a grandfathering regime to lawful firearms owners not only demonstrates to all Canadian’s our government is no longer trustworthy when passing laws but ultimately deems itself above our Bill of Rights,” he said.

 

B.C. RCMP issue warning after ‘several’ illegal assault-style firearms brought to detachment​


An RCMP detachment in B.C. is warning the public against showing up at a local police station if they have firearms they want to relinquish under the federal buyback program.

The Upper Fraser Valley detachment issued the reminder Sunday, after “several individuals” sought to turn in their weapons in recent days.

“While we appreciate the public’s efforts to comply with this program, we would like to remind firearm owners that arriving at a detachment with unsecured or unregistered firearms is a criminal offence,” the statement from Mounties said.

“Individual firearm owners who have declared participation in the program will receive direct instructions on how to schedule a collection appointment.”

The deadline for individuals to register was March 31, according to the federal government, which has released data saying 15,600 firearms were declared in B.C.

Those who missed the deadline but wish to turn in their weapons are urged to call the non-emergency line of their local police department for guidance.

Since May 2020, Ottawa has outlawed about 2,500 types of firearms, including the AR-15 and Ruger Mini-14, on the basis they belong only on the battlefield.

Prohibited firearms and devices must be disposed of or deactivated by the end of an amnesty period on Oct. 30, regardless of whether gun owners take part in the compensation program.

According to a list from the federal government, compensation ranges from $150 to nearly $10,000—depending on the type of weapon.

 

The Carney-Trudeau Gun Grab is Theft​

Posted By: Gary Mauser April 13, 2026

The “gun grab” is theft. It is a massive attack on private property. The firearm licence, originally touted as a public safety measure, has become a noose around the necks of duck hunters and target shooters.

Our necks are in the noose

Non-compliance means confiscation of ALL your guns. Possibly even jail. On October 31, 2026, it is a criminal offence to possess any one of the newly prohibited firearms. The firearms licence of a person who owns/possesses a firearm prohibited by an OIC if it is not surrendered or deactivated or destroyed or has been named a variant can be revoked by notice given under the Firearms Act. Consequently, all firearms in the possession of that person must immediately be delivered to the local police, who will hold them for safekeeping.

The gun grab is theft

The Carney-Trudeau gun grab has rendered valueless private property worth more than $4.0 billion in the hands of law-abiding Canadians while simultaneously bankrupting hundreds of small businesses. Of course, Ottawa promises “fair” compensation. Translated, that means “partial” compensation.

Because of the ban, more than 4,500 small and medium-size businesses, which employ more than 40,000 people, are now stuck with large amounts of inventory that are suddenly illegal for them to sell or export. These businesses can’t absorb such losses; many will need to cut jobs or close their doors. The Canadian Sporting Arms and Ammunition Association estimates the economic loss at between $900 million and $1.06 billion. Partial compensation is anticipated for retailers who surrender inventory.

Liberal Gun Grab is a policy failure:

• There is no evidence to support a prohibition or confiscation of assault-style weapons;
• There is no evidence to support a freeze on the legal sales of handguns to licensed gun owners;
• The police are concerned with smuggled firearms from the United States and privately manufactured firearms (PMFs), not legal gun owners;
• These policies are causing real harm to communities of hunters and sports shooters, Indigenous people, and Canada’s economy and heritage.

No small damage from what is just security theatre.

The Firearm Program is a war on gun ownership

From the onset the Firearms Program was concerned with more than just the criminal misuse of firearms. Back in 2002, the Auditor General of Canada found that “the Program’s focus had changed from high-risk firearms owners to excessive regulation and enforcement of controls over all owners and their firearms.” Firearms ownership had transmogrified from being ordinary to problematic.

Early on the federal civil service demonstrated their distrust of civilian firearms owners. The Auditor General pointed out that the civil service acted as if “the use of firearms is in itself a ‘questionable activity’ that requires strong controls.” The original mission of firearms licencing was compounded by an insistence that “there should be a zero-tolerance attitude toward non-compliance with the Firearms Act.”

The Gun grab is a boondoggle

How could we be surprised by Justin Trudeau’s ban of “scary looking” guns in May of 2020? It was originally estimated to cost $200 million by then-Minister of Public Safety Bill Blair, but the Parliamentary Budget Officer estimated it could cost $756 million just for compensation, plus administration costs. Daniel Fritter in Calibre Magazine argues that it is now budgeted to cost Canadian taxpayers over $1 billion. But the real cost is unknown. Other estimates vary from $3 billion to over $6 billion.

This boondoggle is even worse than the $2 billion long-gun registry that the Harper government cancelled in 2012.

Was the “buyback” successful?

Success depends upon how many firearms were required to be surrendered. The RCMP claims there are between 136,000 and 150,000 ‘Newly Prohibited Firearms’ [NPFs]. Most of these are registered NPFs.

A better estimate is that there are approximately 674,000 firearms to be surrendered, basing it on import/export statistics, including many non-restricted and unregistered firearms. Others estimate there are 2 million or more NPFs in Canada.

67,440 firearms declared by 31 March, so Ottawa reported a 50% success rate, based on the lower RCMP estimate of 136,000.

The more realistic assessment is that 10% of NPFs – or fewer – were declared, based on import/export data.

How long can Ottawa claim success?

Multiple Premiers refuse to participate.
Police services across the country refuse to confiscate guns from licensed Canadians.
Gun owner participation lags far behind government projections.
Public trust continues to plummet.

Now what?

Will Carney suddenly wake up and cancel the gun grab?
Will the Supreme Court of Canada ride to our rescue?

Don’t count on it. The Liberals hate us. And they appointed the judges.

 
Back
Top