Trudeau promises more gun control and goes on the attack against Scheer

Carney Blames Smuggled Firearms for Gun Violence, Shifting Focus From Domestic Gun Control

The previous Liberal government’s focus in reducing gun violence had been to ban a vast array of previously legal firearms and implement a buyback scheme, but Prime Minister Mark Carney spoke on a different priority this week to tackle the problem.

During an unrelated press conference in Hamilton on July 16, Carney echoed what Conservatives and police officials and associations have been saying about what is a core problem of gun violence: smuggled firearms from the United States.

Tory Leader Pierre Poilievre and gun rights advocates have called for the government to use resources to tackle that issue instead of confiscating legal firearms owned by licensed owners.

During the press conference, Carney was asked by reporters about shootings in Hamilton in recent months leading to the death of innocent bystanders, and what his government intends to do about it.

Belinda Sarkodie, 26, was killed on July 11 as the suspect identified by police, 17-year-old Mackale Lavoie, was allegedly firing shots at other individuals.

Carney expressed his condolences to the victims and families and said his government is putting a “huge emphasis” on better controlling the border.

“Because I suspect, and we'll see when this individual is caught, that the gun came from the United States,” Carney said.

He said the “vast majority” of illegal firearms and firearms used in crime “come across our border.”

Strengthening the border and working on prevention were part of measures implemented by former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, but his gun control agenda was heavily focused on banning models of firearms and prohibiting the purchase and transfer of handguns by licensed Canadians.

Buyback

Following the April 2020 mass shooting in Portapique, N.S., Ottawa banned hundreds of rifle models and has kept adding to the list. The killer had illegally sourced his firearms from the United States.

The government has called the rifles to be banned “assault-style” and “weapons of war.”
Government Bill C-21 adopted in 2023 has also created an evergreen definition to automatically ban new models of semi-automatic firearms.

The buyback/confiscation program for newly designated prohibited firearms got underway in late 2024, with the first phase directed at businesses.

Shortly before Carney became prime minister in mid-March, the Trudeau government had announced the gun buyback for individuals would begin in spring 2025.

Public Safety Canada, based on incomplete data because the absence of a firearms registry, has estimated the cost of the program at over $340 million.

As of mid-July, the buyback phase for individuals has not yet started. During the election campaign, Carney pledged he would not only keep the program but that he would be “reinvigorating” it and “quickly putting it into action.”

“We are committed to this and we'll get it done,” he said in April while flanked by then-Liberal candidate Nathalie Provost. Provost, who was elected MP in the Montreal area on April 28, is a survivor from the Polytechnique massacre and a longtime gun control advocate.

Since then, signals sent or not sent by the new Liberal government about the buyback have been mixed.
On the occasion of the National Day Against Gun Violence on June 6, Carney issued a statement that listed a number of actions being taken by his government.

Among those, the prime minister mentioned the introduction of government Bill C-2 to strengthen borders, as well as measures implemented to intercept illegal guns coming across the border. He also said Ottawa would move ahead to revoke firearms licences from those convicted of intimate partner violence.

There was no mention of the gun buyback.

The program has been very slow to roll out and has met various obstacles, such as Canada Post refusing at one point to be involved in the program, fearing potential conflict with gun owners frustrated by confiscation.

The Liberal government alluded to another hold-up in June apparently emanating from the RCMP.

“We will soon be meeting with people from the RCMP firearm warehouse for further discussions, and we will seek to understand concerns surrounding the program,” Liberal MP Jacques Ramsay told the House of Commons during question period on June 13. Ramsay serves as the parliamentary secretary to the public safety minister.

Ramsay said that 12,000 firearms had been collected from businesses and that 10,000 of them have been destroyed as part of the first phase. He called the buyback a “serious program” that “provides fair compensation to businesses and will soon provide it to firearm owners.”

Ramsay was responding to a question from Tory MP Gerald Soroka, who said that gun crimes have significantly increased since Ottawa put its ban into place five years ago.

“Why won’t this Liberal government focus on criminals, make our streets safe, and leave our responsible firearms owners alone?” he said.

Politics

Carney could take a hit from his base by delaying the implementation of the buyback, but it wouldn’t be the first move that runs counter to the direction of the previous government. Carney scrapped the consumer carbon tax immediately after taking office, and his Bill C-5 on major projects is running into indigenous opposition.

On the other hand, the buyback is not popular in Western provinces where Carney has tried to mend fences.

Blaming the United States for Canada’s gun violence could also be more politically convenient as the country is facing tariffs because of U.S. President Donald Trump’s stated concerns about border security.

The beefing up of the border by Canada in recent months has been a direct response to Trump’s policy.

Aside from stopping illegal firearms at the border, Carney said in Hamilton his government will address gun violence by introducing legislation in the fall for bail reform. The Liberal Party also made pledges on that matter during the election campaign.

“We’re working with the provinces on those issues. I'll be meeting with the premiers next week, I’m sure that’s one of the elements that we will discuss,” he said.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/world...fting-focus-from-domestic-gun-control-5888430
 

Mark Carney should add the gun buyback program to his kill list​

Prime Minister Mark Carney wasted no time in axing a signature Justin Trudeau policy the moment he took on the job. It wasn’t that the carbon tax was bad policy, per se, or focused on the wrong target or poorly administered or needlessly bureaucratic. Indeed, Mr. Carney was broadly supportive of carbon pricing as a mechanism to curb greenhouse gas emissions right up until the moment he got the words “Right Honourable” added to his stationery.

The problem with the carbon tax, as we all know, was that it was deeply unpopular in Canada, so the new Prime Minister had no choice but to kill it if he wanted to keep his job.

Since then, Mr. Carney has demonstrated he doesn’t feel particularly wedded to the policies, procedures and perspectives of his predecessor. In 2023, Mr. Trudeau stood in the House of Commons and accused the Indian government of orchestrating the killing of a Sikh leader on Canadian soil. In 2025, Mr. Carney invited Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 in Alberta. For years, Mr. Trudeau lectured the country about Canada’s obligation to welcome and resettle refugees. A month after winning the federal election, Mr. Carney tabled a bill to significantly restrict eligibility criteria for refugees who wish to claim asylum. In 2024, Mr. Trudeau implemented a Digital Services Tax (DST) despite threats of trade retaliation from the U.S. Earlier this week, Mr. Carney cancelled the DST in response to trade retaliation from the U.S.

The value of each decision can be debated on its own merits, but it’s clear that Mr. Carney doesn’t feel compelled to follow the course chartered by Mr. Trudeau. So as long as he’s intent, as he says, on pursuing a more efficient, more effective, less ideological type of governance, there’s one Trudeau-era policy that should rise to the top of his hit list: the Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program.

The government’s plan to buy back thousands of legally owned firearms has been a boondoggle from the moment it was announced. In the wake of a horrific mass killing in Nova Scotia in 2020, the Trudeau government declared it was banning what it called “military-style assault rifles,” which is not an actual firearms designation in Canada. The shooter in that case had not obtained the weapons he used legally, meaning that a ban of this sort would not have prevented his rampage.

Carney unveils public-safety proposals, plans to launch gun-buyback program

Nevertheless, the issue was so urgent, according to the government, that it couldn’t wait for legislation to be passed in Parliament; instead, the government issued an order-in-council to “remove dangerous firearms designed for military use from our communities.” Five years on, not a single one of those dangerous firearms has been collected from an individual license-holder (though 12,195 guns have been collected from businesses as of April 30). The program managed to spend $67.2-million by 2024, before it collected a single gun, and is now projected to cost $459.8-million in 2025-2026. (The Parliamentary Budget Office estimated in 2021 that the total cost could be over $750-million, plus administrative costs.)

Those costs would be defensible if there was some evidence – any evidence – that confiscating the guns prohibited in 2020 (and later, in 2024 and 2025) would meaningfully reduce rates of violent crimes involving firearms. But we know that the vast majority of violent crimes are being committed with illegal firearms; the Toronto Police Service has long reported that the majority of weapons seized by authorities have been smuggled in from the U.S. According to Statistics Canada, in 91 per cent of solved homicides in 2023, the shooter did not have a valid license for the firearm used.

Then there are the ongoing logistical challenges about how guns and gun components will be submitted for compensation. Canada Post is currently participating in the first phase of the buyback program by collecting and shipping prohibited firearms from businesses, but it has refused to take part in the second phase in which firearms will be collected from individuals, citing safety concerns. The federal government might thus have to engage local and provincial police forces, as well as the RCMP, to set up dropoff depots akin to those used by New Zealand during its buyback program (which it announced and completed within the span of one year, though gun crimes continue to rise there).

Mr. Carney didn’t hesitate to kill a defensible policy in the carbon tax. The proposed buyback program, by contrast, isn’t defensible by any measure: it targets the wrong weapons, legally owned by the wrong people, to try to tackle a problem it will absolutely not address. It is already overly bureaucratic, incredibly complicated, and exorbitantly expensive, but the one thing it has going for it is that it sounds good. Who wouldn’t want to ban deadly weapons, after all? Indeed, it’s the antithesis of the carbon tax in that sense, but the buyback program is equally deserving – and arguably, much more deserving – of a spot in the Trudeau-era trash heap.

 

The quiet kill shot​

'Don't like the gun grab? Here's how to tell Ottawa.'

While headlines scream about the rising cost of groceries, power bills, and climate policy flops, something subtler is brewing in Ottawa: a quiet retreat from the Trudeau-era firearms ban.

The 2025 Liberal Pre-Budget Consultation survey offers Canadians an opportunity to influence the Mark Carney government’s public spending priorities.

For gun owners, hunters, sport shooters, and those who care about evidence-based public safety policy, Question 3 is the battlefield. It invites Canadians to choose which federal priorities deserve funding. Among the options? “Completing the firearms buyback program.”

Trudeau’s Firearms Confiscation Compensation Scheme is an expensive political stunt that has already lost credibility in the eyes of the media, economists, and even elements within the Liberal Party itself.

We suggest checking one to three of the following options for Question 3:

Investing in the Canadian Armed Forces

Recruiting more RCMP and Canada Border Services Agency personnel to strengthen border security and combat organized crime

Make bail policies stricter for violent and major crimes

Investing in Canada’s Arctic

Making dual-use investments which serve defence as well as civilian readiness such as airports, ports, telecommunication and emergency preparedness systems

Building up Canada’s defence industries

The Globe and Mail published a surprising op-ed from Robyn Urback calling Ottawa’s Firearms Confiscation Compensation Scheme indefensible, exorbitantly expensive, and politically toxic.

“The proposed buyback program, by contrast [with the carbon tax],” Urback writes, “isn’t defensible by any measure: it targets the wrong weapons, legally owned by the wrong people, to try to tackle a problem it will absolutely not address. It is already overly bureaucratic, incredibly complicated, and exorbitantly expensive.”

Mark Carney is no fool. He’s watching the backlash. He knows how to read political wind. When Liberal-friendly media breaks ranks, government policy shifts soon follow. And if gutting this program saves political capital for more “climate initiatives,” he’ll do it in a heartbeat.

After all, this is the same man who’d bankrupt the country on carbon credits while suddenly pretending to be frugal over a $600-million gun control budget.

Sacrificing Quebec’s dairy cartel shows a bigger game. On the same day as the Pre-Budget Survey was announced, the Liberals softened their stance on long-standing dairy protections. Quebec’s dairy quotas were untouchable for decades, yet today they’re being sacrificed on the altar of trade with New Zealand. If the dairy cartel can be cracked, so can the sacred cow of “gun control saves lives.”

Especially when even Liberal supporters admit it doesn’t.

The Western Standard suggests those of our readers who support legal, responsible gun ownership, consider what our friends at the Canadian Sport Shooters Association are recommending and complete the Pre-Budget Consultation Survey, paying close attention as advised above, to the options in Question 3 of the survey, to be found here.

 
Despite federal crackdown, firearms licencing hits all-time high in Canada

A new report from the RCMP reveals that the number of Canadians holding a government-issued firearms licence reached an all-time high in 2024.

In Dec. 2024, there were 2,412,122 Possession and Acquisition Licence (PAL) holders in Canada, representing a 2.5% increase from 2,352,504 in December 2023.

Every province recorded growth, with Alberta and Ontario leading the way, each seeing a 3.3% rise in licence holders. Alberta added 12,006 new PAL holders, while Ontario saw an increase of 22,356.

According to TheGunBlog.ca, more Canadian adults now hold a PAL than play hockey. The demographic makeup of licence holders remains largely male — 85% — with 15% being women.

Firearms ownership has been deeply embedded in Canadian culture for years, tied to traditions such as hunting, sport shooting, collecting, and self-defence.

Some advocates argue that this cultural significance, combined with government restrictions, may be fuelling a growing interest in gun ownership.

“More and more people are discovering how enjoyable shooting is as a pastime,” Tony Bernardo, the Executive Director of the Canadian Shooting Sports Association, told the Western Standard.

“You’ve got an increasing movement of young people hunting because they’re trying to provide food for their families that isn’t full of preservatives and hormones.”

Despite a recent Statistics Canada report saying police-reported crime dropped for the first time in 2024 since the COVID-19 pandemic, Bernardo believes that violent crime still plays a major role in the PAL increase

“People have realized that the government is not capable of adequately defending you. There’s an old saying, ‘when seconds count, police are minutes away,’” he said.

The PAL is the sole licence issued to new adult firearms applicants in Canada.

In total, 142,332 adults obtained their first PAL in 2024 — resulting in a net increase of 59,618 licences, significantly above the 10-year average annual gain of about 40,000.

Licensing figures show:

• 1,598,112 PALs with non-restricted privileges
• 775,266 with restricted privileges (up 3.1% from 752,002)
• 38,739 with prohibited privileges
• 13,505 minor’s licences
• 4,033 licensed firearms businesses (excluding museums and carriers)

These numbers stand in contrast to the federal Liberal government’s continued efforts to restrict legal gun ownership.

A key element of that agenda is the National Firearms Buy-Back Program, introduced in the wake of the 2020 mass shooting in Nova Scotia.

That program has faced strong criticism from many sectors. In a recent opinion column for The Globe and Mail, Robyn Urback described it as a “boondoggle,” pointing out that five years after the program was announced, no firearms had been collected from individual licence holders.

She went on to say, as of April 30, 2024, “only 12,195 firearms had been turned in by businesses. The program had already cost $67.2 million by 2024 and is projected to reach $459.8 million by 2025–2026, with earlier estimates from the Parliamentary Budget Office putting the total cost at over $750 million, plus administrative expenses.”

Critics also question the effectiveness of the program, noting that most violent gun crimes in Canada are committed with illegal firearms.

Statistics Canada reports that in 91% of solved homicides in 2023, the shooter did not have a valid firearms licence.

Also, the Toronto Police Service has long reported that the majority of seized firearms are smuggled into Canada from the United States.

Despite — or perhaps because of — the federal government's crackdown, interest in legal firearm ownership appears to be growing, with Bernardo saying the police and the federal government are working together using the Firearms Reference Table (FRT) to ban more firearms individually and arbitrarily.

“The courts have ruled [the FRT] has no weight in law,” Bernardo said. “Yet, the RCMP and the Liberal government are using it like it’s some kind of legal decree. They’re prosecuting with it. They can arbitrarily take any firearm and instantly turn it into a prohibited gun.

“It’s the most heinous abuse of law I can ever remember seeing.”

With the number of PAL holders steadily climbing, and new bans and confiscations planned by the government for 2025 — such as the Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program — observers suggest Canada could see even higher numbers of PAL holders in the near future.

 
Back
Top