The Ardent Angler is off base on halibut allocations

sounds like it would work. and you just outlined option 2 from the stanier process.
Obviously along with a "commercial" license comes all the same rules and responsibilities. I would have to record my catch and pay for what ever form of monitoring deemed appropriate and accurate. No change is easy...changing the 88/12 won't be. However I see nothing but an upside for the non-charter sport fisherman with my idea. Whatever the final number is for his quota...we aren't taking fish out of his smaller share. For me I can generate way more income per day! That $600 per halibut trip represents a 6hr trip. In the summer months with an early morning start that has me back at the dock before noon ready to take a second trip out for salmon in the afternoon for another $500 to $600. The extra fish i could sell just adds revenue that makes the operation that more viable.
 
Just be careful with any protest fishery. I've been involved with downtown rolling protests and the media will just sell copies by making you a feature...a bad one. Nothing will sink you faster than a story that plants a perception with the public that you are just another greedy bunch trying to catch more than the other guy. Take some lessons from the FN public media campaign.
 
The current program to educate the public anglers with facts at Town Hall Meetings will work, and has had a good impact already...just check out the latest newspaper columns and articles on the sfibc website, which by the way is updated regularly. A good article just came out ion a Prince Rupert newspaper called Muskeg Press. Coupled with the meeting attendance is good old hard work.....but hey, no sooo hard...just phone and meet with local MPs and MLAs...they actually enjoy seeing people face to face, and it doesn't matter how many have been before you, just add your personal concerns to the list. Of course write the letters one to Minister Shea, and make sure one goes to Prime Minister Harper...he may not know what his Fisheries Minister is up to.

I see there is still discussion over the unacceptable proposal to have members of the Public have to buy or lease quota for fish we already own, according to the Minister they are a common property resource of Canadians, so that the public can fish all season long with minimal bag and possession limits?? There seems to me a fundamental flaw in requiring us to pay for our fish which certainly appear to have been given away to private businessmen, unless of course the Minister is correct when she says she can reallocate at any time because she has " absolute Discretion"

Of course no has mentioned that beyond the philosophical debate that we shouldn't have to pay to get access to our own fish, there is the problem that under current Fisheries regulation and Fisheries Act, it is illegal for anyone to purchase quota unless they have a commercial fishing license, in theory attached to a commercial boat. Once the license is legally acquired, no one may fish both recreationally and commercially at the same time. The commercial license catch must be harvested, landed and accounted for as commercial caught fish, then on a separate trip the recreational fish can be caught. That is, as I say, under current regs, which seem reasonable to me....why change them just so the resource can be completely changed into private property for the few who can afford to buy the right to fish?

Cheer up Holmes,if we stick together, and use the political system well and in large numbers, we should see some changes coming this season, but yes, we have to get together, and do some of the homework. Go to the Town Hall meeting near you, talk to some of the resource people there acting as speakers and moderators to see what you can do to help..we need all of you!

Traveller
 
Back
Top