Derby
Crew Member
I was just joking around. Meaning everyone SHOULD be on this forum. My jokes are terrible online.
haahaha.. haven't got a sense of your humor yet let me know if i can be a help with your event
Last edited:
I was just joking around. Meaning everyone SHOULD be on this forum. My jokes are terrible online.
Don't forget your special secret Decoder Ring
Sad to see two good forum member's obviously on the same side
"going at it".
Realizing we all have different views on the subject, we should keep in mind
the common goal.
Sad to see two good forum member's obviously on the same side
"going at it".
Realizing we all have different views on the subject, we should keep in mind
the common goal.
Thank you for the feedback, good team of people trying hard to get this up and running. Our main concern is to see that correct facts are getting out there, and that we tell the public about the value the rec fishery brings to Canada. Too easy for some to say the quick solution is to close every fishery down - those people apparently do not understand the consequences of that sort of action and how little it would actually do to recover SRKW. Not to mention, there is no actual recovery goal on a population that has never numbered more than 98 in several centuries. We have NRKW that now out number historic levels, and yet they too are listed as "threatened." A lot can be done to give SRKW every chance to thrive, while also ensuring the recreational, commercial and FN fisheries also thrive.
Thanks all for your support and encouragement. The WCFGA and SFI strongly believe in the social and economic contributions the recreational fishery has made to Canada's heritage. We hope to build stronger Third Party Endorsements from a well informed public and community leadership.
Here's a number to toss at you. If we closed down the Victoria marine fishery that would result in saving a grand total of 6632 Fraser Chinook. Assuming that the SRKW could actually find and then eat every single one (very unlikely), that is enough fish to feed a population of 82 SRKW for only 7 days. How would that action result in a viable recovery strategy that saves SRKW? Emotion at play, not science.This is excellent. Thank you for all your hard work. Emphasizing the value the rec fishery and the point you bring u about how some still think the quick solution is to close every fishery down are excellent points. Your suggestion that the public needs to understand the consequences of closing fishing and how little it would actually do to assist in any recover of SRKW, are also excellent points. Although I have seen some reference to it , I think there needs to be more education on the sites as to what the actual numbers of Chinook ( percentage) are taken by us. I recall seeing figures like 4% for us vs 40% taken by pinnipeds. If the public knew our Chinook take was so little .....but still with such a huge value to the BC economy, I think it might start to sink in. The value has even MORE value when it takes so little.
Edit - THANKS TO HC !
Here's a number to toss at you. If we closed down the Victoria marine fishery that would result in saving a grand total of 6632 Fraser Chinook. Assuming that the SRKW could actually find and then eat every single one (very unlikely), that is enough fish to feed a population of 82 SRKW for only 7 days. How would that action result in a viable recovery strategy that saves SRKW? Emotion at play, not science.
I tossed in $100.