new entirely self-contained floating FF

  • Thread starter Thread starter gimp
  • Start date Start date
G

gimp

Guest
QINDAO, China - A new entirely self-contained floating farming system, built by a Canadian research and development outfit, has opened the door to year-round salmon farming in China.

The system quickly drew the attention of Fairchild Capital Management, a Vancouver venture capital firm, when it was unveiled at the China Fisheries and Seafood Expo Nov. 3-5.

"We've built closed containment rearing technology and built our first commercial plant in China," said Richard Buchanan, CEO of Agrimarine Holdings Inc.

The Vancouver, British Columbia-based company built its first commercial farm near Shenyang, in southern Liaoning Province, an short drive from Beijing and its 13 million residents.

First harvests of rainbow trout and salmon from the Chinese facility are expected in late summer 2010. Agrimarine is also raising Chinook salmon in a demonstration unit it built near Campbell River, British Columbia, with first harvest also expected next year.

Contracted by the British Columbian government in 2000 to find a fix to escape, disease and pollution problems common to traditional net pen farms, Agrimarine developed a self-contained package that includes 10 tanks, each 79 feet in diameter and 20 feet deep.

Circulating water that is completely replaced every hour provides a semblance of ocean currents that improves flesh quality while removing fecal matter and unconsumed feed. Waste material is recycled for compost.

The floor of each unit is also fitted with video cameras that allow for more efficient feed use, Buchanan said.

"When (feed) pellets are seen falling through, you know feeding is done. You know the fish are full," he said.

Based on limited information Buchanan said he projected a 10 percent savings in feed costs.

Agrimarine began its research with a target cost cap of $750,000 per unit, based on a 25-year amortization per tank, more than twice the life of standard net pens.

He emphasized that unit costs depend on the specific requirements of individual farm sites, including water depth and freshwater sources. Final product cost is very roughly $300,000 per unit in a 10-tank package, including all support systems, such as monitoring, circulation and oxygenation.

Each unit is constructed from 24 pie-slice sections flanged together with stainless steel bolts. The 10-tank packages are framed in catwalks of varying height depending on whether they are used in lakes, where they may need protection from ice, or coastal seas with higher waves.

"We're going to do salmon in the Yellow Sea," Buchanan said. His company is looking at four properties in China with plans for two each for salmon in cold-water regions and two for yellow fin tuna in warmer seas.

A self-contained farm was always the primary goal, but research that began in 2000 focused on a land-based, 50-foot diameter concrete tank system thought best to address circulation and waste control. Concrete turned out to be a poor construction material. It was porous enough to allow kelp to grow, which shed and plugged drains and was coarse enough to damage salmon that brushed against its surface.

By 2004, it became obvious that larger tanks were needed for cost efficiency and that floating tanks were more practical for structural reasons. Concrete tanks with aluminum liners were found to be too heavy. Aluminum tanks with steel reinforcement bands were too flexible and subject to corrosion.

Agrimarine also experimented with icebreaker and space ship technology before finding that it could use the same material used to build the blades of wind generators: layered fiberglass and foam infused with resin.

Buchanan said Canadian First Nations tribes that have been critical of net pen farms because of pollution and disease problems that threaten wild salmon stocks have embraced the new technology for its sustainability and the jobs they expect it to produce in seafood processing plants.

Buchanan said a 10-tank unit can be operated by a crew of about 12 people and because it doesn't rely on ocean currents to remove pollution, can be located closer to processing plants and markets.

Buchanan also attended China's first seafood sustainability forum to promote his product and connect with international certification organizations.

"We have to somehow brand our product, our fish, to distinguish it in the market from fish that's not sustainable," he said. "It's a small step in recognizing sustainable foods and food production, but for us, it's how we get our message to the consumer, that our product, our technology is sustainable and distinguish it from all the other food that is in the market place."

To date, Agrimarine has found little interest from existing British Columbia salmon farmers, but Buchanan is confident they and other net pen users will change.

"The industry is now starting to see around the world, particularly in Chile, that it's bad," he said, referencing the disease-driven collapse of Chilean Atlantic salmon farms. "I think eventually the net cage guys will come around and see this is cheaper and supported by the consumers."

Joseph Fung, managing partner of Fairchild Capital Management, declined to disclose his company's plans regarding Agrimarine Holding or its Chinese subsidiary, Benxi AgriMarine Industries Inc.

"We can't say how we want to be involved. We're doing due diligence now," Fung said Nov. 5.

Picture002-1.jpg
 
You do know? This was developed in Canada and it was decided to move and build it in China due to "less red tape" and "costs", right!
 
O I know and all this time you see marine harvest asking for research money(tax payer money)for close containment.

Picture002-1.jpg
 
Hey Gimp,
Have you got a source for that article?
I heard a clip on the radio last Thursday morning about that operation. They will be raising steelhead trout to compete against Norwegian salmon in the Chinese market.
That operation is one of only a few industrial facilities allowed to operate in or near the reservoir by the Chinese govt. Net pens would not be allowed in there.

Norwegians are also starting to look at closed systems to deal with an increasingly serious sea lice problem there.
 
This technology has existed for years. The net-penners have been ignoring it while continuing to enjoy their free-ride - 'sh!tting in our front yard' - at the expense of our marine ecosystems.

One thing is certain: the Norwegian's and our collusive Provincial Gov't. & DFO will ride it and milk it for all they can before this long overdue and environmentally-friendly technology finally comes into the public eye and government has no choice but to force the industry to go to closed-containment.

You can rest assured also that when that day arrives, that the Norwegian net-penners' are sent packing, the DFO and our sorry Campbell government will be standing there taking credit for it all...

I'm a little surprised these new set-ups can function with a turn-over rate of only once per-hour? Marine aquaria need a turn-over rate of at least 4-per hour if I'm not mistaken.

"Some could care less if there's any fish left for our kids!"
 
Thx Gimp,
This is great news for this Canadian company. I wish them the best with their venture in China.
quote:
"The region's pristine water resources present a significant value proposition and provides a perfect aquatic environment for establishing a salmon aquaculture industry", said Chief Executive Wang Yu of Siping Municipal Government. "We look forward to implementing AgriMarine's revolutionary closed containment rearing technology, allowing the culture of large fish for the growing food service and retail sector serving the top tier cities of China, while preserving and safeguarding the natural environment."
"We are very proud to be working with the regional authorities of Siping City and Tiedong district," said Richard Buchanan, CEO of AgriMarine. "The agreement signed today represents a further strengthening of the Company's footprint in China, and, consistent with the theme of Prime Minister Harper's message during his recent visit, exemplifies the opportunity for Canadian companies to increase business relations with China."

Too bad Harper only has increasing trade with China as a priority and not also preserving and safeguarding the natural environment of Canada.
 
Hey Hawk,

They need a turn over rate of 1 hour to reduce the build up of Carbon Dioxide. CO2 acts as a sedative which slows growth rates, which is of course something that you would not want in this application.

I would like to know how they are removing the waste materials and feed from the water stream. That has always been a problem with these systems. This is very similar to the system which was marketed in the 90's by a company called Future Sea. They couldn't make the waste trap work so maybe these guys have found the solution. Anyways I wish them the best, maybe they have found the solution where so many have failed over the last 30 years.
 
I have seen closed containment farms in mid/northern Norway in the mid 90's. Nobody can tell me that one couldn't have worked out beginner glitches over a period of well over 10 years. Certain agendas have blocked any progress for the benefits of quick and easy profit without consideration of environmental impacts.[xx(]
 
Actually Chris 73, the environmental impacts of closed containments are as bad if not worse than a net pen.

Fish still can get sea lice in a CC.

They still can get diseases.

If it is a flow through system than the pumping of the huge amounts of water necessary requires the burning of a lot of fossil fuels, giving them a huge carbon foot print.

They still escape from a CC.

They do hold out the promise of better growth rates, but in practise these rarely overcome the higher operating costs.

They have been well researched over and over again over the last 30 years, and the same conclusion is reached. They do not solve the problems attributed to net pens, and actually create more.
 
Please post where you are getting your information from. I would like to research your claims Sockeye.

Picture002-1.jpg
 
Actually Gimp its personal observation and experience. Sorry I did not publish it. I have managed several CC systems over the years.
 
Gimp,
There is a life cycle assessment of different types of salmon farming operations done and reported on here;
http://sres.management.dal.ca/Files/Tyedmers/LC_Impacts.pdf

All pretty dry stuff to read but on page 10 in the Conclusion is this nugget of scientific enlightenment; "Overall, the results of this study reveal that while a shift to
closed-containment technologies may reduce the set of proximate
ecological impacts typically associated with conventional salmonid
farming, their increased use may also result in substantially
increased contributions to several other environmental impacts of
global concern, including global warming, acidification, and abiotic
resource use. It is beyond the scope of this study to determine
which set of impacts should be of greater concern, however, these
tradeoffs should be factored in to the ongoing discussion on how to
improve the environmental performance of salmonid farming.
Although closed-containment systems are currently being
described and promoted as environmentally-friendly alternatives
to net-pen farming, results of this study suggest that there is an
environmental cost associated with employing this technology
which should be considered in any further evaluation of their
environmental performance."

Finding a way around those global impacts by pumping water through tanks with renewable sources instead of the old fossil fuel model shouldn't be too hard in this day of alternative energy research. We just have to put our minds to figuring out how to do things better.

I do enjoy this thread as it seems to focus on finding the way forward instead of arguing about why/why not or who's right and who's wrong.
 
quote:Originally posted by sockeyefry

Fish still can get sea lice in a CC.
Seems it was not CC, then - just partially CC. Closed means closed. Maybe you rather meant recirculating, not closed containment then...
 
Yes Agent, That would be a flow through style of CC, which the one in this thread being placed in China is. A recirc system would be an entirely different kettle of fish (sorry).

Systems cannot be "closed" as they have to get some water from somewhere. Even a recirc has to have 1 - 2% of its water flow replaced every minute.

Very good link Cuttle. It outlines how solving one problem may lead to others. I do agree with you that in this age of alternate power systems we should be able to marry up recirc technology and alternate power to overcome these issues associated with the extremely large power requirements.
 
quote:Originally posted by sockeyefry

Yes Agent, That would be a flow through style of CC, which the one in this thread being placed in China is. A recirc system would be an entirely different kettle of fish (sorry).

Systems cannot be "closed" as they have to get some water from somewhere. Even a recirc has to have 1 - 2% of its water flow replaced every minute.
The intake must not be filtered, in order for cultured fish to get sea lice. If you get the mesh size to 20um or microns, there will be no sea lice. That might mean a header tank for settling coarse solids and a rotary drum filter to keep it clean - but it can be done...

If your fish don't get sea lice, then they can't give it to wild stocks, right?...
 
Agent,

A screen size of 20 mic is pretty small for filtering raw seawater in any quantity. It would be easier of course if you had a saltwater well, but that limits the places in which you could put your farm.

I don't know if you have a concept of just how much water flow is required. Even a recirc would require somewhere in the range of 20,000 lpm to produce 3000 tonnes, which is the production of 1 net pen farm. It would be quite a large filtration plant to achieve the level of 20 mic, although not impossible.

It would be a very interesting project to look into a large scale recirc project for salmon grow out. Maybe we could retrofit the old pumped ashore farm in Cedar?

There is not a fish farmer in the world who would not agree with you on keeping the fish free of lice. They do not want them either.
 
Back
Top