Input on recovery of Southern Resident killer whale potential general vessel management measures for 2025 and 2026

😲 OMG.

Unlike stakeholder forums that weigh recovery measures within the context of economic interests and policy constraints, this workshop was designed to prioritize science- and evidence-based solutions.
 
One of reccomendations. Completely shut all marine salmon fisheries and shift allocation to in river fisheries.

Loaded wording to target catch and release and any MSF openings. Also insinuating that somehow fish will get magically bigger.

Wording:

Assess benefits of shifting marine fisheries to terminal areas (i.e., terminus of salmon migration where immature Chinook are not encountered) to increase Chinook abundance, restore larger prey, and enhance SRKW access prior to fisheries.
 
Here the NGO groups coming on the attack today.


1752007578562.png
A statement from the B.C.-based conservation groups says the report marks the first time scientists have proposed a road map for the recovery of southern resident killer whales on both sides of the Canada-U.S. border.

The report makes a series of 26 science-based recommendations, including limiting fisheries to help the whale access their main prey, chinook salmon, along with eliminating toxic chemicals that build up in their food chains and adopting enforceable underwater noise standards.


“We specifically wanted to have a conversation that was science-focused, but we were mindful of keeping this as realistic as possible,” Barrett-Lennard says.







 
Last edited:
Barrett-Lennard says the whales are particularly dependent on the largest, fattiest chinook, which spend the first year of their lives in freshwater streams.

“Those are the fish that the killer whales take preferentially and to meet their nutritional requirements,” he says.

“They also tend to be the ones that fishermen love.”


The report recommends ensuring the orcas have “priority access” to early-season chinook in the Fraser River through fishing closures. It also calls on government to identify seasonal and annual prey thresholds for the whales, and to close fisheries when their needs are not met.
 
The war flag has been hoisted. Thanks SV for reading through this report and finding those flags. I think it is time for a critiques of their assertions back into the media scrum.... Maybe pile those critiques on this thread....
 
I'm sorry the ENGOs are not our friends. You support them on one issue and they screw you on another..... they are not on our side. I don't trust them as far as I can throw them...... buyer beware .... you get what you pay for
 
Another rec was to increase the vessel separation distance to 1000 m. There will now be solid outback from those parasites known as the whale watching industry, aka the marine paparazzi. That's the stakeholder group the scientific panel wants to avoid in their discussions.

It sure feels like an uphill battle. The messaging in regular media following the release of the paper and its recs was heavily emotive. The whales will become extinct if we don't do something! Your average reader/viewer has no idea that orcas are plentiful worldwide, that it's this one population with its lack of adaptability that is under threat. Mainstream media has totally bought into this narrative, following the story of juveniles that get lost, sad mamas looking for them, using the nicknames for individual animals. Major anthropomorphism going on here, creating big emotional ties to just 73 embattled animals.

Even in our southern BC waters we have frequent visits from the transient whales, those are the ones doing the Lord's work (eating seals). That this population is healthy and stable is mostly unknown to the public. How is it that the SRKW can't/won't adapt to preying on pinnipeds, a fat-rich high energy food source? Aren't orcas the most intelligent species on the planet?
 
When they say " orcas have priority access", clearly they are referring to another species. There I said it as best I could.
 
Another rec was to increase the vessel separation distance to 1000 m. There will now be solid outback from those parasites known as the whale watching industry, aka the marine paparazzi. That's the stakeholder group the scientific panel wants to avoid in their discussions.

It sure feels like an uphill battle. The messaging in regular media following the release of the paper and its recs was heavily emotive. The whales will become extinct if we don't do something! Your average reader/viewer has no idea that orcas are plentiful worldwide, that it's this one population with its lack of adaptability that is under threat. Mainstream media has totally bought into this narrative, following the story of juveniles that get lost, sad mamas looking for them, using the nicknames for individual animals. Major anthropomorphism going on here, creating big emotional ties to just 73 embattled animals.

Even in our southern BC waters we have frequent visits from the transient whales, those are the ones doing the Lord's work (eating seals). That this population is healthy and stable is mostly unknown to the public. How is it that the SRKW can't/won't adapt to preying on pinnipeds, a fat-rich high energy food source? Aren't orcas the most intelligent species on the planet?
They are LIBERAL whales
 
Back
Top