Jencourt
Well-Known Member
I would like to make a quick point.
The overwhelming majority of the 85% that is awarded to commercial fishers is exported out of the country. This is 85 % of what is allocated by IPHC after supposedly meeting all conservation requirements.
My point is that-what is assigned to Canadians is supposed to be utilized in a way that is respectful to the fish, meets social/economic needs in the best way and guarantees that the best use by Canadians for Canadians comes first.
As it stands now the rec sector does not get enough of that TAC to conduct a proper season. I would challenge that the restrictive size limits may even hinge on no longer being respectful to the fish. They have definitely greatly affected the expectation of harvest, forcing anglers to target a smaller and smaller demographic of the biomass. (Which happens to include the very size of fish that are lacking in the IPHC tests) Yet the mass majority of Canadians TAC continues to be utilized by foreign buyers holding prices high and benefiting fewer and fewer Canadians.
This is the result of ITQ fisheries. No good for Canadians and history has proved (according to stuff I have read on them) also no good for fish.
The overwhelming majority of the 85% that is awarded to commercial fishers is exported out of the country. This is 85 % of what is allocated by IPHC after supposedly meeting all conservation requirements.
My point is that-what is assigned to Canadians is supposed to be utilized in a way that is respectful to the fish, meets social/economic needs in the best way and guarantees that the best use by Canadians for Canadians comes first.
As it stands now the rec sector does not get enough of that TAC to conduct a proper season. I would challenge that the restrictive size limits may even hinge on no longer being respectful to the fish. They have definitely greatly affected the expectation of harvest, forcing anglers to target a smaller and smaller demographic of the biomass. (Which happens to include the very size of fish that are lacking in the IPHC tests) Yet the mass majority of Canadians TAC continues to be utilized by foreign buyers holding prices high and benefiting fewer and fewer Canadians.
This is the result of ITQ fisheries. No good for Canadians and history has proved (according to stuff I have read on them) also no good for fish.
Last edited: