from the Charlottetown "Guardian" newspaper

Cuba Libre

Well-Known Member
Editor:

Everyone loves a good fish story, but the recent letter about federal Fisheries Minister Gail Shea and the Pacific halibut fisheries is far-fetched (‘Shea’s announcement very disappointing’, The Guardian, Feb 28, 2011).

The long-standing Pacific halibut allocation policy provides commercial sector 88 per cent and recreational sector 12 per cent shares of total allowable catch, after First Nations constitutional fishing rights have been met. Since 2003, four federal fisheries ministers have examined the facts and upheld the allocation policy, which was the result of extensive stakeholder consultations and included an independent allocation adviser.

Commercial halibut fishermen have been developing the resource for more than 100 years, and have achieved the globally-recognized Marine Stewardship Council certification.

Pacific halibut are in a cyclical period of low abundance and the combined commercial and recreational allowable harvest limit in British Columbia has been significantly reduced – from 13.24 million pounds in 2006 to 7.65 million pounds in 2011. Commercial fishermen understand that low abundance means lower harvests.

The commercial fishery is made up of hardworking people who supply food to hundreds of thousands of Canadians who enjoy eating commercially-caught halibut in restaurants or at home. Lobbying Minister Shea to arbitrarily re-allocate halibut from this group of Canadians to benefit fishing lodge and charter vessel businesses who account for 60 to 70 per cent of the recreationally-caught halibut undermines defensible policy and process.

Experience has shown us on both the east and west coasts that fishery management decisions based on lobbying efforts do not serve the resource, stakeholders, or the citizens of Canada well. In her recent statement, Minister Shea has made it clear that conservation is paramount; the fish come first and everyone must bear the costs of conservation. And that approach is fair and equitable.

And by the way, contrary to Mr. Well’s statement, commercial licence holders are identified on DFO’s website.

Chris Sporer,

executive manager,

Pacific Halibut Management Association,

Vancouver, B.C.
 
Yes the east coast cod fishery was also well managed for probably longer and That is now a vibrant fishery? What a crock of fecal extreme.
 
Part of the reason that we are all in the situation that we are with the Halibut today, is because people like this Chris Sporer have the ear of the Minister. There is a way or something that these people are doing that is getting the Minister to listen to them and act on their behalf.

And there is no way that the conservation card truely fits the hand that these groups hold. The methods by which they fish are far more efficient at removing fish from the ocean, and they do in fact remove WAY more fish from the Ocean than all of the recreational fishermen could remove from the ocean in 5 years time!

For someone to say the commercial fishery has developed the Halibut resource over the last 100 years, to make it sound like the commercial fishery is the main steward for conservation of the Halibut, is absolute BS.

The first thing is the halibut were around way before there was a Commercial Halibut fishery. His comment would have been more true if he had stated that the commercial fishery helped DFO develop the Halibut QUOTA Fishery that we have today, which is a part of the problem that we have today with the Halibut fishery.

The other thing that he fails to mention is that the groups that people like him are a part of or aligned with, are lobbying the Minister themselves to prevent the necessary changes to the current Halibut fishery. Such as allowing changes to the system that will provide better accountability for the Sport Sector. Such as changing the system so that the minister has a realistic and flexible mechanism in place to adjust sector % levels from year to year. There are many things that the Minister has been Lobbied to prevent changes to the system in order to protect the FINANCIAL intrests of the Commercial fishery, not the CONSERVATION!

He also fails to inform the general public that a major portion of the Halibut caught in Canada are exported for the highest PROFITS.

The Commercial fisheries are designed to fish in the most efficient manner in order to remove more fish from the ocean in the shortest periods of time to make more PROFITS. This is fine, the Commercial guys need to make a living too, but don't use them as the posterchild of conservation, as many of them are concerned about conservation (individually), the commercial fishery as an industry is not, it is about more profitable fishing and more harvest. Afterall the main reason that we have a commision like IPHC to monitor and regulate the Halibut fishery is in order to reign in the commercial appetite to harvest as much as possible for more profits.

I am not against commercial fishing here, this is just the plain truth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Atta boy Jay!!! Well said. You have had a lot of good things to say lately. I hope you are saying them to the people that need to hear them and not just all of us.
 
Atta boy Jay!!! Well said. You have had a lot of good things to say lately. I hope you are saying them to the people that need to hear them and not just all of us.

Yeah, problem is that I am pretty sure that they are not listening:mad:. Since all we ever seem to get back for a result is acknowledgement letters saying thank-you and we will pass this on to someone that might pass this on to someone that might actually read it. They never seem to answer any direct questions. But hey we can't give up, sooner or later someone is going to start to listen and get on board to enact change.
 
Yeah, problem is that I am pretty sure that they are not listening:mad:. Since all we ever seem to get back for a result is acknowledgement letters saying thank-you and we will pass this on to someone that might pass this on to someone that might actually read it. They never seem to answer any direct questions. But hey we can't give up, sooner or later someone is going to start to listen and get on board to enact change.

We need our side to send a letter to the editor also, its got there att . When a letter gets in the paper in her own riding it hits home. I hope Nogg or Rockfish can put something together to repond. And we have the numbers on our side so if everyone sends a letter they will know we are standing up as a group of Canadians. You can do it thru e-mail which is great just go to the Guardian in PEI
Keep the pressure up..
 
I think Jencourt writes a reasonable and attention getting letter that is to the point without being rude or insolent. Just a thought.
 
Back
Top