I am not even sure I want to jump into this "family" argument? But, I think this "dead horse" has been beaten enough?
quote:Originally posted by haverodwilltravel
Firstly, I think that about 90% of BC constitutes unceded territory by the Indians. Hence, they have not given up their rights to those resources.
That might not be 100% correct? It might be a little more complicated than that? Without getting into treaties (or the lack thereof), The Indian Act, etc, etc! It pretty much boils down to "Status". If a person is considered "Non-Status", which is one who considers themselves Indians though Canada does not recognize them as such, they fall under a different category and do NOT have any special fishing rights:
"indigenous person not recognized by government: a member of an indigenous people not recognized by the federal government of Canada as having special rights and privileges, especially the right to live on a reservation."
quote:Secondly, "we" have blown our allotment of fish by allowing industrial development ( ie destruction of the environment), without the proper environmental safeguards. The Indians have not shared equally in the "prosperity" of these developments.
I don't think anyone can really argue that, but need to change it to "Indians,ALONG WITH MOST OTHERS", have not shared equally! Same thing happened down here in the States!
quote:Now have any of you heard of the Prosperity Mine that's slated to go in in the Memiah Valley of BC???
This is a prime example of "we", modern white society desecrating the environment. The plan is to use Fish Lake as a tailings pond for a gold mine. Firstly, this will kill 85,000 in the lake. Secondly, Fish Lake runs into the Chilko River, which runs into the Fraser River. This has the potential to kill the river and it's tributaries.
Is this still not in litigation, for that reason?
quote:The bottom line is that we will all suffer as the economic benefits will not outweigh the environmental costs. But who will suffer more? Yes, it's the Indians. And then people will be even more ferocious in erroneously blaming the low fish stocks on the Indians for "illegal" fishing practices, which are not illegal in their case.
I do NOT believe any one culture is going to suffer more than the other? If you look at what is currently transpiring, The First Nations, Canada, British Columbia are currently working on some VERY long - drawn out - negotiations concerning establishing treaties to resolve these issues. And, might I add! If you look at what they have done recently... It is pretty fair to all concerned!
TFN, Canada, BC, and DFO all know there is a problem and while it is going to take time, I see things getting worked out! Look at the current treaties just put into effect?
If there are questions concerning the activities of an individual or group, just call DFO's Hotline? If you do that, you have done your part!
Actually I am a LOT more worried about the "Fraser River Sockeye", along with "Robertson Creek" issuses and what is being done?
This is also starting to sound more like a political debate?
Just my 2 cents!