DFO buried scientists concerns about Steelhead!

OldBlackDog

Well-Known Member
DFO buried scientists' concerns about endangered steelhead, B.C. deputy minister says
Federal Environment Minister urged to accept the unaltered version of the Science Advisory Report on Fraser Steelhead
Randy Shore
Updated: February 24, 2019

0327-endangered-rivers.jpg

Steelhead spawning streams are among the most endangered rivers in B.C. B.C. Wildlife Federation / PNG

Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) suppressed elements of a scientific assessment that could have led to stronger protections for a steelhead population on the brink of extinction, according to a letter written by B.C. Deputy Minister of the Environment Mark Zacharias.

DFO unilaterally changed the conclusions to “support status-quo commercial salmon harvesting” in a report based on a stock assessment of the Interior Fraser steelhead, reads the letter sent to federal Deputy Minister of the Environment Stephen Lucas.

The changes could also affect Environment Minister Catherine McKenna’s decision on whether to protect the stock now at “imminent risk of extinction” under the Species at Risk Act (SARA).

“…(T)he DFO-authored summary is no long scientifically defensible,” writes Zacharias, who adds that when confronted about the changes, DFO refused to restore the summary points supported by B.C. and the lead authors of the assessment.

Salmon harvesting is the “only substantial threat to Interior Fraser steelhead that can be immediately mitigated” to save a population that has fallen from 8,000 spawners to only 277, writes Zacharias.

DFO is still crafting its response to the letter.

The Recovery Potential Assessment recently completed by DFO was peer-reviewed by the Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) peer review process, according to the ministry.

The resulting Science Advisory Report provides “the best available consensus-based science advice.”

Because steelhead are an unintentional by-catch of salmon fisheries, DFO is proposing to continue with 27-day rolling closures of commercial and First Nations salmon fisheries implemented last year, which are “designed to protect the central 90 per cent of the steelhead migration from key fisheries.”

The closures anticipate the steelhead as they migrate through the Johnstone Strait and the Strait of Juan de Fuca and into the Fraser River.

But critics such as Watershed Watch and the B.C. Wildlife Federation say the science supports closures between 60 to 84 days to protect the run from imminent extinction.

The original research document, produced in a rare collaboration by provincial and federal scientists and outside contractors, was vetted by 42 experts from government, academia, First Nations and conservation groups, but never publicly released.

“The best available science was whitewashed by DFO,” said BCWF spokesman Jesse Zeman.

The DFO process uses modelling to predict how long a closure their target number of steelhead need to get through, but stakeholders are concerned that their target is based on the current run size, a tiny fraction of the run’s historic abundance, said Greg Taylor, senior fisheries advisor for Watershed Watch.

B.C. has already limited recreational trout fishing and taken measures to protect critical steelhead streams, while First Nations in the Interior have voluntarily stopped fishing salmon runs that result in steelhead by-catch, Zacharias says.

In addition, B.C. is updating an Interior Fraser Steelhead Emergency Action Plan using updated science and monitoring data gathered last year.

“We remain concerned over DFO’s salmon harvesting allocations, as loss of steelhead through by-catch is a known challenge to recovery efforts,” said a Ministry of Forests (FLNRORD) spokesperson. “The numbers of fish that returned last season was the second lowest on record.”

As for the joint scientific assessment at the heart of the conflict, “… we look forward to this work becoming publicly available through the DFO processes.”

Early last year, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) recommended an emergency listing order for the Interior Fraser steelhead under SARA, which Minister McKenna is obligated to consider.

“It is essential that decision-makers, including (McKenna), be provided with scientific evidence that is independent of fisheries management decisions,” Zacharias writes.

However, if the steelhead are officially protected under SARA, it becomes illegal to “kill, harm, harass, capture or take an individual” of the species, which would effectively shut down any salmon fishery that might intercept them.

In practice, the federal government never lists a fish under SARA where it could impact commercial fisheries, said Taylor.

Eight of the 24 distinct sockeye populations that spawn in the Fraser and its tributaries are now regarded as endangered by COSEWIC. None has been listed under SARA.

The Steelhead Society of B.C. urged the provincial government to keep up the pressure on Ottawa to act.

“It is evident that the DFO cannot be expected to simultaneously manage commercial fishing interests and fish conservation objectives,” said president Brian Braidwood. “We urge federal Environment Minister Catherine McKenna to accept the unaltered version of the Science Advisory Report, and declare Interior Fraser steelhead an endangered species.”

“The minister is required to make a decision based on best-available science and federal bureaucrats have attempted to interfere by spinning the information she is provided,” he said.

rshore@postmedia.com
 
The Recovery Potential Assessment recently completed by DFO was peer-reviewed by the Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) peer review process, according to the ministry.
 
But critics such as Watershed Watch and the B.C. Wildlife Federation say the science supports closures between 60 to 84 days to protect the run from imminent extinction.

The original research document, produced in a rare collaboration by provincial and federal scientists and outside contractors, was vetted by 42 experts from government, academia, First Nations and conservation groups, but never publicly released.

“The best available science was whitewashed by DFO,” said BCWF spokesman Jesse Zeman.
 
It’s an election year, budget deficits are ballooning, fish don’t vote. Our fish don’t have any political leverage in Ottawa because BC has never had enough seats in Parliament to matter. This year we matter, it’s a close election and as you can see, we’re getting dollars to help our fish. Will it be enough, nowhere near! The real concern is will this investment be a one off? Probably but here’s the thing that really bothers me. What’s our province doing to help with these critical issues? Where’s the Government of BC’s investment in thede issues? They’re busy patting themselves on the back because they balanced the budget! Well they cut or underfunded or didn’t fund at all, some critical aspects of our fisheries. What’s the Government of BC doing to address these issues? This years budget doesn’t appear to have much if anything in it for us. That’s a real mystery to me. Who benefits more than coastal communities from investing in our fisheries? It appears that our government was more interested in the appearance of a balanced budget rather than a budget that funded areas of real concern
 



This is going to be the story that keeps on giving. Just wait and watch.

I would have paid to be in the room(s) when conversation was occurring between Minister Wilkinson and three provincial Ministers. Given the gap between the province's Minister of Agriculture and its Minister of Forests, Lands....... re those endangered steelhead and now the emergence of the new provincial player, the Ministry of Environment....... I can't help but wonder who the provincial lead was. The letter from the provincial Deputy Minister to his federal counterpart was unprecedented, especially after years of the Ministry of Agriculture being in bed with DFO whenever steelhead interception fisheries were on the agenda.

Kudos to DM Zacharias. He may not appreciate it just yet but his voice is a huge morale booster for those whose conservation efforts have been thwarted repeatedly thus far.

And, thank you Randy Shore. You've made a lot of friends by exposing these circumstances.


Bob Hooton
 
David Suzuki Foundation director Jay Ritchlin would take it one step further: Senior ministers need science advice that is not filtered by economic and political considerations.

“This is part of an ongoing problem with the way science advice gets to cabinet ministers,” he said. “This blew up because a very strong effort to provide science advice got muddled by economic and political advice before being moved forward.”

The tone of the letter between the deputy ministers was “incredible” for communication at the highest level of government, “the equivalent of typing in all caps on social media.”

“Politicians have to make tough decisions and consider the economy and the politics, but they can’t do that well if the science has already been modified,” he said.

Science advice should be delivered in its original form, with separate commentary by bureaucrats
 
The sad reality is that the FED, our PMO can find money/funds to give away Tweeting millions of Canadian dollars to suck up to celebrities - $50,000,000 in one Tweet. Yet here we are year after year coast wide focused areas urgently need funding to help find solutions that may save endangered Fraser fish, seem to fall short on the importance check list.
https://wakeupeh.com/2019/02/23/trudeau-gets-even-more-tone-deaf-with-a-50m-tweet/

HATE to tell the GROUP that went to that website to view that and did NOT SEE that coming but the list of people that have videos there sure seem to be a who's who in the WHITE Nationalists community here in Canada. Sure you guys still what to like that?
 
And this has what to do with the subject of the thread?

Interesting that no one appears to be upset about this!
 
HATE to tell the GROUP that went to that website to view that and did NOT SEE that coming but the list of people that have videos there sure seem to be a who's who in the WHITE Nationalists community here in Canada. Sure you guys still what to like that?

Has nothing to do with the original article.

I will say be careful. If dfo does approve said listing literally rolling 30-60 day closures of ALL salmon fishing on the coast. And no commercial fishing. It’s just completely unrealistic. And unnecessary!!! So I wouldn’t push for what writer of original article asks.
 
Science advice should be delivered in its original form, with separate commentary by bureaucrats.

Everyone here says , show us the science. Yet here is an example of DFO ignoring science and everyone here is good with it?

Further the Province finally shows some real care about a fish that they were supposed to be responsible for.

Note that the BCWF was helpful in moving this forward, good for them.

Get all the effected groups in a room and come up with a realistic way to get these fish back to spawn.
Bet they can come up with some great ideals.
 
HATE to tell the GROUP that went to that website to view that and did NOT SEE that coming but the list of people that have videos there sure seem to be a who's who in the WHITE Nationalists community here in Canada. Sure you guys still what to like that?

Is this what the Central Committee has told its members to call people who believe in free thought ??
 
Get all the effected groups in a room and come up with a realistic way to get these fish back to spawn.
Bet they can come up with some great ideals.

DFO has already came up with management measures around these stocks that are pretty restrictive.

The time to make these changes was 10 years ago, Now if we want to protect this stock its using the SARA advice and that a total closure for everyone ocean and in river.

There is no getting everyone in a room and coming up with a solution because all those groups have already wrote DFO saying they do not support a listing or the restive measures already put in place that will dampen the chum harvest.

for example look at what the commercial fishing group has asked for:

"The Area D Area Harvest Committee has put in proposal to the Department to consider some flexibility on the end dates of the rolling IFR steelhead window closure in Areas 12 and 13 with the use of drop weedlines on gill nets. This proposal is currently under review."
 
Good post wmy. These fish were doomed years ago, and as you state, there is not the appetite for a closure to protect what is left of these fish.
Their only hope is if FN completely stop in river netting, and we know that is not about to happen.
 
Using this thought, we should then forget the Chinook that are now on the way to extinction?
They are no different and DFO has known about them being doomed for years.





Good post wmy. These fish were doomed years ago, and as you state, there is not the appetite for a closure to protect what is left of these fish.
Their only hope is if FN completely stop in river netting, and we know that is not about to happen.
 
Using this thought, we should then forget the Chinook that are now on the way to extinction?
They are no different and DFO has known about them being doomed for years.

A few upper Fraser chinook stocks are now so low they might well be extinct in a few more cycles. And yes, to protect them would entail the same harvest and habitat restrictions that won't happen with interior steelhead, for the same reasons.
 
Using this thought, we should then forget the Chinook that are now on the way to extinction?
They are no different and DFO has known about them being doomed for years.

you do know an upper fraser river SFAC passed a motion asking to close recreational chinook fishing in river and ocean right? that was voted down at the SFAB level. Perhaps if the SCC actually showed up motion like this would of got more support.

upload_2019-2-27_17-3-35.png

upload_2019-2-27_17-4-4.png
upload_2019-2-27_17-5-41.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top