Climate: LNG in B.C. vs Alberta tarsands

Status
Not open for further replies.
Uploaded on Sep 9, 2009
http://www.ted.com Photographer James Balog shares new image sequences from the Extreme Ice Survey, a network of time-lapse cameras recording glaciers receding at an alarming rate, some of the most vivid evidence yet of climate change.

[DjeIpjhAqsM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjeIpjhAqsM

And in other news a guy name "steve" woke up this morning and had a thought bubble appear over his head. It said.... I think I'll practice my armchair climate ideas and post some nonsense on the web so my fans have something to read...... and poof like pixie dust it was so.
 
Uploaded sept 9th.
What else do you need to know.
O yes this is december. Merry xmas!
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/12/02/green-energy-jobs-canada-oilsands_n_6252910.html

Clean Energy Jobs Now Exceed Oilsands Jobs In Canada: Report
CP/HuffPost Canada
Posted: 12/02/2014 4:30 am EST Updated: 12/02/2014 9:59 am EST WINDMILL WORKER

Which industry employs more Canadians? The oilsands or clean energy?

Guess again.

Employment in Canada's clean energy sector has jumped 37 per cent in the past five years, says a new report from the think tank Clean Energy Canada, and now exceeds employment in the oilsands.

There were 23,700 people directly employed by the clean energy industry in 2013, compared to 22,340 jobs in the oilsands, the report found. Those green jobs include people employed in clean power production, energy efficiency, biofuels and manufacturing of green energy technologies.

Those job gains were the result of about $25 billion in new investment over the past five years, the report said. It singled out Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia as the three provinces leading the way in clean energy investment.

The report said that the federal government has helped lay the groundwork for green energy, "but has done very little to build on it."

The Canadian Press reports:

OTTAWA - Canadian investments in clean energy totalled $6.5 billion last year, a 45 per cent increase from 2012, according to a new study released Tuesday.

More than half the Canadian investment — $3.6 billion — went into wind power, with another $2.5 billion invested in the solar sector, says Clean Energy Canada, an advocacy and research organization.

The investment spike moved Canada up to seventh place among the Group of 20 industrialized nations, from 12th spot a year earlier.
"We hear a lot of talk about pipelines and the oil and gas sector," Merran Smith, the director of Clean Energy Canada, said in an interview.

"What we don't hear is that Canada's actually gone from a boutique clean energy industry to really big business."
Over the past five years, $24 billion has been invested in clean energy, and the sector now accounts for almost 24,000 direct jobs, a total that includes manufacturing but not construction employment.

The report comes as Canadian officials begin two weeks of meetings in Lima, Peru, on the United Nations framework convention on climate change.

Greenhouse gas emissions are rising again in Canada, according to Environment Canada projections, and the country will not come close to meeting its 2020 international target for curbing emissions under the 2009 Copenhagen accord. The talks in Lima are part of negotiations for a post-2020 international agreement that is supposed to be completed next December.

The UN talks were given a jolt of adrenalin last month when the United States and China, the world's two biggest emitters, announced a bilateral deal to curb emissions through 2030.

Both the Chinese and U.S. governments are investing heavily in renewables.

"There's a clean energy transition underway globally already, and they're backing their clean energy industries," said Smith.
What makes the Canadian investment story more compelling is that it's happening without much federal government interest.
Private sector financiers — many from abroad — and provincial governments are driving the investment boom.

Of the top five financiers of clean energy in Canada over the past five years, investing $3.44 billion among them, two are Japanese, two are German and just one is Canadian, says the study.

Clean Energy Canada would like to see a federal industrial policy, based on tax and research incentives, like the one that helped Canada's aerospace and oil sands industries in their infancy.

"If the federal government got engaged we could be a real world leader in clean energy," said Smith. "But the federal government is really missing in action."

-- Bruce Cheadle, The Canadian Press
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You go hard, you are in Canada and are allowed your opinion.
However, you have to allow other people theirs.
You decided that your way was the only way as a few others here did.
They like you think no one else is allowed an opinion or is right about anything on this subject.
Well, as you and others here said the arguments are over and man made global warming is a fact due to man made co2 then you all have to defend your opinion.
{stuff clipped}

1) I've said this before and I'll say it again - No you are not entitled to your own opinion on matters of fact (data) nor are you necessarily entitled to your own opinion on the interpretation of the facts. Here's a post I've provided before that explains the rationale for this - http://theconversation.com/no-youre-not-entitled-to-your-opinion-9978. One of the big problems we face these days is that the climate deniers are incredibly well funded and they write a lot of complete crap that distorts or outright lies about the data. E.g. we can't even come to agreement on the underlying facts as you're getting fed a lot of complete BS. If we can't agree on the facts (sea ice, pH and global temperature changes), we have no hope of agreeing on the interpretations, models, future actions etc. That's exactly the state those with a vested interest in the status quo hope to create. Clearly they have accomplished that with a large enough fraction of the population (you included) to make any sensible subsequent discussion nearly impossible.

2) I could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong and what purpose would that serve?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And i suppose you are defending ALL the IPPC statements as fact?
If not, then explain which ones you disagree with and why.


1) I've said this before and I'll say it again - No you are not entitled to your own opinion on matters of fact (data) nor are you necessarily entitled to your own opinion on the interpretation of the facts. Here's a post I've provided before that explains the rationale for this - http://theconversation.com/no-youre-not-entitled-to-your-opinion-9978. One of the big problems we face these days is that the climate deniers are incredibly well funded and they write a lot of complete crap that distorts or outright lies about the data. E.g. we can't even come to agreement on the underlying facts as you're getting fed a lot of complete BS. If we can agree on the facts (sea ice, pH and global temperature changes), we have no hope of agreeing on the interpretations, models, future actions etc. That's exactly the state those with a vested interest in the status quo hope to create. Clearly they have accomplished that with a large enough fraction of the population (you included) to make any sensible subsequent discussion nearly impossible.

2) I could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong and what purpose would that serve?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/a...e-triples-in-amundsen-sea-embayment-1.2857816

Antarctic glacial melt rate triples in Amundsen Sea embayment
Scientists analyzed 21 years of data from 1992-2003
CBC News Posted: Dec 02, 2014 4:02 PM ET Last Updated: Dec 02, 2014 4:03 PM ET

Glaciers in the west Antarctic have tripled their melt rate over the past decade, a new study has found after scientists examined 21

Scientists from the University of California and NASA analyzed 21 years of data tracking how much ice glaciers in west Antarctica's Amundsen Sea embayment lost from 1992 to 2003. The area is considered the fastest melting region in Antarctica.

Poles apart? Antarctic sea ice hits record high while the Arctic's keeps melting
Sea ice loss in Canada's north, 1968-2010

"The mass loss of these glaciers is increasing at an amazing rate," scientist Isabella Velicogna, a co-author of a published paper explaining the findings, said in a written statement.

The researchers found glaciers in the area lost a total average of 83 gigatons of mass per year. The researchers say this is the water weight loss equivalent of Mount Everest's weight every two years.

That measurement accelerated about 6.1 gigatons annually during the period studied.

The scientists studied four sets of observations spanning 2003-09, including two data sets from NASA, as well as the European Space Agency and the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands.

During this time, scientists found the glaciers lost an average of 84 gigatons of mass and the melt rate increased 16.3 gigatons annually on average. This is "almost three times the rate of increase for the full 21-year period," according to a statement announcing the results.

The paper was published in Geophysical Research Letters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

and you don't find this statment in the news artice a little troubling?
“This is all telling us that not all the megafauna in North America were wiped out in an instant due to one single cause. Rather, there were regional die-offs, in places like the Beringia, long before the final extinction occurred in other parts of the continent,” he said.
Kind of reminds me of the problems we are seeing with the pine beetle in the interior of BC.
Just another example that you do not understand what is going on....... Geology shows that climate changes slowly most of the time. The problem with today is we are changing our climate extremely fast. When we look at geology and find times that have fast (1000's of years) climate change we find mass extinction. Your team seems to think we should roll the dice and run the experiment and see what happens. Your team are gambling on the future and are not even playing with a full deck of cards. What could go wrong.....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sea level rise... This area of study needs more work but IMHO we know enough that we should be very concerned.
http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/modeling-sea-level-rise-25857988

1_2.jpg
 
http://www.wmo.int/pages/mediacentre/press_releases/pr_1009_en.html

Lima/Geneva, 3 December 2014 (WMO) - The year 2014 is on track to be one of the hottest, if not the hottest, on record, according to preliminary estimates by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). This is largely due to record high global sea surface temperatures, which will very likely remain above normal until the end of the year. High sea temperatures, together with other factors, contributed to exceptionally heavy rainfall and floods in many countries and extreme drought in others.

Nothing could go wrong....right?
clip_image002_014.gif

Highest temp on record and it's not even an El Nino year.... Let's see how "steve" and "bob" spin this one OBD
"If you can't explain the paw's, you can't explain the cause..."
Oh the irony in this statement from the climate denial blogosphere......

clip_image004_000.jpg


globe_annual_ranked-22.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[h=1]WMO Weather Reports 2050 - France[/h][_s55xNz26qQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_s55xNz26qQ
 
OBD - as for the two references in your sig line to Einstein - you might want to see what he actually said. The second "quote" has no verifiable attribution to Einstein whatsoever. The first statement is also taken way out of context. In fact, scientific matters are generally settled by consensus - consensus agreement between the best theory and the available data and a consensus of scientist believing that they have general agreement about the science and how it explains the data. The IPCC reports, the AAAS reports the numerous other reports by scientific bodies and governmental agencies due their best to represent that consensus and to display the estimated degree of uncertainty in the various models and projections. Spending time trying to defend each and every statement (or trying to shoot down each and every statement) is a fools errand.
 
In a rapidly changing north, new diseases travel on the wings of birds
Date: December 2, 2014
Source: Ecological Society of America
Summary: When wild birds are a big part of your diet, opening a freshly shot bird to find worms squirming around under the skin is a disconcerting sight. That was exactly what Victoria Kotongan saw in October, 2012, when she set to cleaning two of four spruce grouse (Falcipennis canadensis) she had taken near her home in Unalakleet, on the northwest coast of Alaska. The next day, she shot four grouse and all four harbored the long, white worms. In two birds, the worms appeared to be emerging from the meat.

When polar bears (Ursus maritimus) meet glaucous gulls (Larus hyperboreaus) over the remains of a bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus), they may be sharing more than a meal. As the warming climate brings animals into new proximity, parasites, viruses, and bacteria can find opportunities to spread to new and naïve hosts, sometimes jumping from birds to mammals, and from marine ecosystems to land ecosystems.

When wild birds are a big part of your diet, opening a freshly shot bird to find worms squirming around under the skin is a disconcerting sight. That was exactly what Victoria Kotongan saw in October, 2012, when she set to cleaning two of four spruce grouse (Falcipennis canadensis) she had taken near her home in Unalakleet, on the northwest coast of Alaska. The next day, she shot four grouse and all four harbored the long, white worms. In two birds, the worms appeared to be emerging from the meat.

Kotongan, worried about the health of the grouse and the potential risk to her community, reported the parasites to the Local Environmental Observer Network, which arranged to have the frozen bird carcasses sent to a lab for testing. Lab results identified the worms as the nematode Splendidofilaria pectoralis, a thinly described parasite previously observed in blue grouse (Dendragapus obscurus pallidus) in interior British Columbia, Canada. The nematode had not been seen before so far north and west. Though S. pectoralis is unlikely to be dangerous to people, other emerging diseases in northern regions are not so innocuous.

Animals are changing their seasonal movements and feeding patterns to cope with the changing climate, bringing into close contact species that rarely met in the past. Nowhere is this more apparent than the polar latitudes, where warming has been fastest and most dramatic. Red foxes are spreading north into arctic fox territory. Hunger is driving polar bears ashore as sea ice shrinks. Many arctic birds undertake long migratory journeys and have the mobility to fly far beyond their historical ranges, or extend their stay in attractive feeding or nesting sites.

With close contact comes a risk of infection with the exotic parasites and microorganisms carried by new neighbors, and so disease is finding new territory as well. Clement conditions extend the lifecycles of disease carrying insects, and disease-causing organisms. Migratory birds can take infectious agents for rides over great distances. In November 2013, Alaska Native residents of St. Lawrence Island, in the Bering Sea, alerted wildlife managers to the deaths of hundreds of crested auklets, thick-billed murres, northern fulmars and other seabirds, caused by an outbreak of highly contagious avian cholera (Pasteurella multocida).

"It's the first time avian cholera has shown up in Alaska," said Caroline Van Hemert, a wildlife biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Anchorage, Alaska. "St. Lawrence Island is usually iced in by November, but last year we had a warm fall and winter in Alaska. We don't know for sure that open water, climate, and high-densities of birds contributed to the outbreak, but it coincided with unusual environmental conditions."

Circumstantial evidence collected by researchers and local observers is pointing toward a surge of infectious disease in the northern latitudes, but scanty baseline data makes interpretation of current trends uncertain. Van Hemert and colleagues review the state of our knowledge of emerging disease in northern birds and effects on wildlife and human health, discussing strategies for cooperative programs to fill in information gaps in the December issue of Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

Story Source: The above story is based on materials provided by Ecological Society of America. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
Journal Reference: Caroline Van Hemert, John M Pearce, Colleen M Handel. Wildlife health in a rapidly changing North: focus on avian disease. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2014; 12 (10): 548 DOI: 10.1890/130291
 
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/12/141203083754.htm

New study explains the role of oceans in 'global warming hiatus'
Date: December 3, 2014
Source: University of Southampton
Summary: New research shows that ocean heat uptake across three oceans is the likely cause of the ‘warming hiatus’ – the current decade-long slowdown in global surface warming. Using data from a range of state-of-the-art ocean and atmosphere models, the research shows that the increased oceanic heat drawdown in the equatorial Pacific, North Atlantic and Southern Ocean basins has played a significant role in the hiatus.

Warming hiatus illustrated.
Credit: Image courtesy of University of Southampton

New research shows that ocean heat uptake across three oceans is the likely cause of the ‘warming hiatus’ – the current decade-long slowdown in global surface warming.

Using data from a range of state-of-the-art ocean and atmosphere models, the research shows that the increased oceanic heat drawdown in the equatorial Pacific, North Atlantic and Southern Ocean basins has played a significant role in the hiatus.

The new analysis has been published in Geophysical Research Letters by Professor Sybren Drijfhout from the University of Southampton and collaborators from the National Oceanography Centre (NOC) Dr Adam Blaker, Professor Simon Josey, Dr George Nurser and Dr Bablu Sinha, together with Dr Magdalena Balmaseda from the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF).

Professor Drijfhout said: "This study attributes the increased oceanic heat drawdown in the equatorial Pacific, North Atlantic and Southern Ocean to specific, different mechanisms in each region. This is important as current climate models have been unable to simulate the hiatus. Our study gives clues to where the heat is drawn down and by which processes. This can serve as a benchmark for climate models on how to improve their projections of future global mean temperature."

Previously, the drawdown of heat by the Equatorial Pacific Ocean over the hiatus period, due to cool sea-surface temperatures associated with a succession of cool-surface La Nina episodes, was thought to be sufficient to explain the hiatus.

However, this new analysis reveals that the northern North Atlantic, the Southern Ocean and Equatorial Pacific Ocean are all important regions of ocean heat uptake. Each basin contributes a roughly equal amount to explaining the hiatus, but the mechanisms of heat drawdown are different and specific in each basin.

In the North Atlantic, more heat has been retained at deep levels as a result of changes to both the ocean and atmospheric circulations, which have led to the winter atmosphere extracting less heat from the ocean.

In the Southern Ocean, the extra drawdown of heat had gone unnoticed and is increasing on a much longer timescale (multi-decadal) than the other two regions (decadal). Here, gradual changes in the prevailing westerly winds have modified the ocean-atmosphere heat exchange, particularly in the Southern Indian Ocean.

The team calculated the change in the amount of heat entering the ocean using a state-of-the-art high resolution ocean model developed and run by NOC scientists that is driven by surface observations. This estimate was compared with results from an ocean model-data synthesis from ECMWF and a leading atmospheric model-data synthesis produced in the US. Professor Josey said: "It is the synthesis of information from models and observational data that provides a major strength of our study."

Dr Sinha concluded: "The deeper understanding gained in this study of the processes and regions responsible for variations in oceanic heat drawdown and retention will improve the accuracy of future climate projections."

Story Source: The above story is based on materials provided by University of Southampton. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
Journal Reference: S. S. Drijfhout, A. T. Blaker, S. A. Josey, A. J. G. Nurser, B. Sinha, M. A. Balmaseda. Surface warming hiatus caused by increased heat uptake across multiple ocean basins. Geophysical Research Letters, 2014; DOI: 10.1002/2014GL061456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061456
 

Attachments

  • 141203083754-large.jpg
    141203083754-large.jpg
    61.1 KB · Views: 12
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top