Can see it now...wtf?

SpringFever2359

SpringFever2359

Well-Known Member
Wake me up from this never ending $h!t$ho₩
Whats next, what stops Alberta or Saskatchewan 1st nations setting up gillnets on the Fraser? ..where/when will it stop

Indigenous leaders are celebrating a court ruling that says First Nations hunters from outside Saskatchewan have a constitutional right to hunt in the province and don’t require a licence. The ruling …

http://flip.it/qy477Y

Find your favourite topics on Flipboard. Download here.
http://flip.it/q2c-.t
 
StormTrooper said:
20% 2020, 30% 2030, 50% 2050 UN. Canada's lands and oceans are tuning into parks for a reason, 50% by 2050. Who will you vote for...a weak clown that panders to globalist elitism, or a good debater who will create all kinds of feedback groups and may not accomplish enough in a timely fashion due to indecisiveness and inexperience. Greens or NDP...ya sure, not for me. I have been reviewing lots about PPC, their platform is interesting and may have some areas and ideas that just may pull this lost country back together again. I am still undecided, but I am studying at least 3hrs each night. I will make the best decision when the time comes with my vote.
Click to expand...

If I didn’t think it was a wasted vote I would also vote PPC. But unfortunately it’s this type of swing vote that can keep the Libtards in power.
 
StormTrooper said:
There comes a time in history where we all need to break the cycle of "voting out" the parties we dislike. It's always because it is all about what we don't want. It is always between the same two parties that keep screwing with Canadian livelihoods. It's the same **** all the time...we vote them out, then in comes a brewing new **** storm. We all settle until we can't take it any more and then we all go back to the other for another round of crap. I am making my choice based on my wants and needs, based on the act of vigilant study, what I think is the best for me, my family and Canada as a whole. I review all party platforms, short list and then find all the ones with potential and study their platforms until it's time to vote. Right now I am down to two. I will be voting for what I do want, not what I don't want.
Click to expand...

Wait till next election to break that cycle ;):p
 
I see little choice but to do what is necessary to get rid of The Libs. Scheer is not ideal but I have had good discussions with the candidate in our area and I’m comfortable with the person more than the party. It seems BC likes to buck the trend and go NDP or Green. Not sure that plays out well if there is a majority of either government.
 
fish4all said:
I see little choice but to do what is necessary to get rid of The Libs. Scheer is not ideal but I have had good discussions with the candidate in our area and I’m comfortable with the person more than the party. It seems BC likes to buck the trend and go NDP or Green. Not sure that plays out well if there is a majority of either government.
Click to expand...
Would work out great in a minority government. Thats how we got medicare.
 
This has nothing to do with whatever corrupt political party is currently in power. It is instead a ruling on access to Crown Land in Saskatchewan by Treaty Nations - and NOT non-treaty First Nations. Some of those treaty areas cover large areas - and across several Provinces. Can't say I necessarily agree w the judge's decision, neither, but that's w/o yet reading the decision and the associated Saskatchewan Natural Resources Transfer Agreement. It does appear to conflict w other case law - but then treaties are a different matter altogether...
 
StormTrooper said:
20% 2020, 30% 2030, 50% 2050 UN. Canada's lands and oceans are tuning into parks for a reason, 50% by 2050.

...oh, and yes I know exactly who will have access and who won't as easily as it once was. Hence why I started warning people just a little over 10 years ago. None of it is new. Simply progression.
Click to expand...
Seems more like regression not progression. So much for one land.
 
StormTrooper said:
Progression of the agenda - simply not for all the people. Hence my warnings that ran fully ignored by all for more than 10 years. There is only one way to stabilize it all and that requires dumping the UN. Which party will do that?!
Click to expand...
Hopefully the cons.
 
Kowtowing to the UN has become so common they have essentially started to manage our governments. The UN envisioned initially was a great idea, unfortunately it has morphed into a third world controlled, corrupt and ineffective organization . The UN has a well paid team of bureaucrats who pontificate on a perfect world, with them largely controlling it. If anyone seriously thinks the UN has the moral right to lecture anyone, please take the time to look at which countries have seats on their various committees. Start with Human Rights!
 
not convinced that we need another used car salesman or lawyer or drama teacher as a prime minister, and.. we seem to be veering off topic again....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top