wolf
Well-Known Member
Love this also if you can afford this said boat IMO you can afford the fuel bill...Pursuit with twin 300s and reduced fuel costs don't go together well.
Love this also if you can afford this said boat IMO you can afford the fuel bill...Pursuit with twin 300s and reduced fuel costs don't go together well.
Pursuit with twin 300s and reduced fuel costs don't
Very nice! Hopefully it works out for you. I was a little concerned when I first upgraded my old Pursuit, with a single 250, to my newer Pursuit with 300’s. Once you figure out trim and props I found I was only burning 6 to 7 gallons more an hour. Which seems like a lot, but when I thought about it, I went from 24’ and 8’6” beam to basically 29’ and a 9’6” beam. Bigger, better, and safer handling big seas, and way more comfortable. Smiles per gallon!Hopefully in 2 weeks I’ll be a proud Pursuit owner too. Mines got twin 300 Yams as well. Looking for ways to reduce fuel costs. Sharrow is the only thing that seems to offer hope. I’ll be looking forward to hearing your experience.
Ya, agreed. Your fuel burn looks pretty decent. I’m going from 23x8’6” 250 hp to 32’-10’-8” 600 hp so it’s gonna burn motor fuel. My old fuel burn was 9-11 gph. Now I’m hoping for 21-25 gph or 1.3/5 mpg. But I’ve got 14,000 lbs of mass and I can sleep comfortably now. Life’s about trade offs. This is one I’m fine with. Nothing wrong with trying to minimize operating costs tho. Hence Sharrow interest.Very nice! Hopefully it works out for you. I was a little concerned when I first upgraded my old Pursuit, with a single 250, to my newer Pursuit with 300’s. Once you figure out trim and props I found I was only burning 6 to 7 gallons more an hour. Which seems like a lot, but when I thought about it, I went from 24’ and 8’6” beam to basically 29’ and a 9’6” beam. Bigger, better, and safer handling big seas, and way more comfortable. Smiles per gallon!
YOLOYa, agreed. Your fuel burn looks pretty decent. I’m going from 23x8’6” 250 hp to 32’-10’-8” 600 hp so it’s gonna burn motor fuel. My old fuel burn was 9-11 gph. New I’m hoping for 21-25 gph or 1.3/5 mpg. But I’ve got 14,000 lbs of mass and I can sleep comfortably now. Life’s about trade offs. This is one I’m fine with. Nothing wrong with trying to minimize operating costs tho. Hence Sharrow interest.
Let’s see this new sledYa, agreed. Your fuel burn looks pretty decent. I’m going from 23x8’6” 250 hp to 32’-10’-8” 600 hp so it’s gonna burn motor fuel. My old fuel burn was 9-11 gph. New I’m hoping for 21-25 gph or 1.3/5 mpg. But I’ve got 14,000 lbs of mass and I can sleep comfortably now. Life’s about trade offs. This is one I’m fine with. Nothing wrong with trying to minimize operating costs tho. Hence Sharrow interest.
Once Survey is done and it clears customs.Let’s see this new sled
Do you happen to know what size props you have on it now. Might get some fuel savings if you’re able to pitch up. I tried, going up on pitch, and it cut my burn by 1.5 gallons on average but had to go back to what I had because I couldn’t push the boat forward in rough conditions due to cavitation. Suzuki’s are know for this. The Yam’s might not be as bad, and it might work. Gallon or so adds up over a season, could be cheaper than the sharrows.Ya, agreed. Your fuel burn looks pretty decent. I’m going from 23x8’6” 250 hp to 32’-10’-8” 600 hp so it’s gonna burn motor fuel. My old fuel burn was 9-11 gph. Now I’m hoping for 21-25 gph or 1.3/5 mpg. But I’ve got 14,000 lbs of mass and I can sleep comfortably now. Life’s about trade offs. This is one I’m fine with. Nothing wrong with trying to minimize operating costs tho. Hence Sharrow interest.
I don’t know what props are on it. Factory spec though I assume.Do you happen to know what size props you have on it now. Might get some fuel savings if you’re able to pitch up. I tried, going up on pitch, and it cut my burn by 1.5 gallons on average but had to go back to what I had because I couldn’t push the boat forward in rough conditions due to cavitation. Suzuki’s are know for this. The Yam’s might not be as bad, and it might work. Gallon or so adds up over a season, could be cheaper than the sharrows.
pretty muchyou realize that the first time you get anything into that prop the savings go out the window, also who is going to repair it if it gets damaged?
You buy their “insurance” program. All damaged props are replaced. Also, let’s face it, a Chinese knockoff has gotta be around the corner with China no long respecting copywriting laws. Even if they do follow laws, they still copy ****.you realize that the first time you get anything into that prop the savings go out the window, also who is going to repair it if it gets damaged?
$40 a month for each prop. So $800 a year in prop insurance.
Does wood usually damage a stainless prop? It seems to me that rocks are usually what damage a stainless prop?